- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Walgreens pharmacist denies pregnant woman miscarriage medication over his ethical beliefs
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:40 pm to shawnlsu
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:40 pm to shawnlsu
Well in this case state law and Walgreens policy allow the pharmacist to do this.
Still dumb though cause it wasn’t for an abortion.
Still dumb though cause it wasn’t for an abortion.
This post was edited on 6/25/18 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:42 pm to lsunurse
quote:You shouldn't unless you have your own practice imo. When you work for someone else aren't you supposed to do as they say and follow their rules and guidelines?
He is protected by state law to refuse.
As someone in the medical field....I believe medical professionals deserve this protection. This extends to pharmacists as well.
So by your logic....a nurse asked to assist with an abortion has no right to refuse?
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:42 pm to p&g
quote:
Good.
He doesn't want to help the baby killer in her disgusting attempt at murder.
Give the man a raise.
Joke or not, frick off.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:42 pm to lsunurse
quote:
Refusing to serve fries to someone is a bit different than refusing to assist with something on a patient that you morally object to.
Ah, the old fry cook gotcha. Can't argue with that one.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:44 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
You shouldn't unless you have your own practice imo. When you work for someone else aren't you supposed to do as they say and follow their rules and guidelines
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:44 pm to lsunurse
quote:why are morals allowed in the medical field, but not anywhere else? It is free market capitalistic economy, people can't just go against what their boss or company owners say just because they disagree with it.
Again....you clearly are not in the medical field.
Refusing to serve fries to someone is a bit different than refusing to assist with something on a patient that you morally object to.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:45 pm to CarRamrod
quote:but why are there laws to protect medical professionals?
there are laws that protect the employee in these situations so you too are wrong. That not an opinion.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:46 pm to MontyFranklyn
Because the medical field deals with the actual lives of others.
Not that hard to figure out
Not that hard to figure out
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:46 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
When you work for someone else aren't you supposed to do as they say and follow their rules and guidelines?
In this specific instance the pharmacist did what was allowed by state law and Walgreens corporate policy.
This post was edited on 6/25/18 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:46 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:You are setting up for some kind of gotcha.
It is free market capitalistic economy, people can't just go against what their boss or company owners say just because they disagree with it.
You can refuse an action and face whatever consequences that exist.
Or you can be protected by your contract, like this pharmacist was.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:47 pm to MontyFranklyn
Believe it or not a long time ago people decided that the value of someone’s life means a little more than changing a tire, serving a hot dog, baking a cake, etc.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:47 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
You shouldn't unless you have your own practice imo. When you work for someone else aren't you supposed to do as they say and follow their rules and guidelines?
Hospitals have rules and guidelines that say the nurse does not have to participate if it conflicts with her religious views, just as Walgreens had a policy that said the pharmacist did not have to fill the px.
So, in this hypothetical, both medical professionals would be following their employer's guidelines.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:47 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
why are morals allowed in the medical field, but not anywhere else?
So i dont know where you are going with this.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:47 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
When you work for someone else aren't you supposed to do as they say and follow their rules and guidelines?
Not when state and federal laws protect your right to refuse.
This isn’t refusing to care for someone who is black or gay btw.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:47 pm to lsunurse
quote:Doesn't that create a slippery slope? Doesn't that allow for discrimination using interpretation as an avenue? Won't that allow for Drs. to refuse care to anyone at anytime based on their beliefs?
Because the medical field deals with the actual lives of others.
Not that hard to figure out
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:48 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
why are morals allowed in the medical field, but not anywhere else?
Seriously?
Things are a bit different when talking about human lives.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:48 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:there are laws protecting all US Citizens
but why are there laws to protect medical professionals?
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:48 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
people can't just go against what their boss or company owners say just because they disagree with it.
For fricks sake, read the damn article. Walgreen's policy allows the pharmacist to refuse to fill the prescription.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:48 pm to lsunurse
quote:But why are laws in place to protect their right to discriminate based on morals/ethics?
Not when state and federal laws protect your right to refuse.
This isn’t refusing to care for someone who is black or gay btw.
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:48 pm to Scruffy
I’m not in the medical field, and I certainly don’t know what the solution and ramifications to said solution(s) would be, but I do know that it seems wrong to me what happened in this particular case.
There may very well be people that defend the pharmacist’s actions with sound and legal arguments , but my guess is that most Americans would think the pharmacist and Walgreens were out of line here in this particular set of circumstances. I can’t speak for every medication and every patient and every set of circumstances, but I do believe this particular woman should not have been denied this particular perscription.
There may very well be people that defend the pharmacist’s actions with sound and legal arguments , but my guess is that most Americans would think the pharmacist and Walgreens were out of line here in this particular set of circumstances. I can’t speak for every medication and every patient and every set of circumstances, but I do believe this particular woman should not have been denied this particular perscription.
Popular
Back to top



0



