- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Voting yes to more BR road taxes today is like giving O a contract extension.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 11:16 am to TigerGman
Posted on 12/8/18 at 11:16 am to TigerGman
quote:
Just don't ever come on here and bitch about Baton Rouge traffic.
I reserve my right to bitch no matter what.
Voting no against a bad plan pushed forward by a bad administration doesn't make you a bad citizen.
Let's figure out what to do to finish the Green Light plan I voted for first before we turn these people loose with even more of our tax money.
What's wrong with that?
This post was edited on 12/8/18 at 11:39 am
Posted on 12/8/18 at 12:33 pm to Tshiz
quote:
Change my mind
If you think that we don't need any more improvements in EBR parish than the 8 or so projects left on the green light plan then vote no. If you want traffic improved, then vote yes. Depends on if you enjoy our current traffic, driving on roads that need upgrades, etc.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 12:34 pm to InflateADate
quote:Look, someone else who refuses to hold his government accountable and actually believes it will be different this time.
If you think that we don't need any more improvements in EBR parish than the 8 or so projects left on the green light plan then vote no. If you want traffic improved, then vote yes. Depends on if you enjoy our current traffic, driving on roads that need upgrades, etc.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 12:36 pm to BurningHeart
quote:I agree, and I can't stand coach O.
much rather give O a contract extension..
Posted on 12/8/18 at 12:45 pm to doubleb
quote:
I reserve my right to bitch no matter what. Voting no against a bad plan pushed forward by a bad administration doesn't make you a bad citizen. Let's figure out what to do to finish the Green Light plan I voted for first before we turn these people loose with even more of our tax money. What's wrong with that?
So why are all th conservative mayors in EBR parish, who are generally anti TAX, for this measure? Why is Ultra conservative Woody Jenkins for it? Why are the prominent conservative business leaders in the city supporting it? Baton Rouge Business report supporting it. Metro counsel members who originally voted against putting the measure on today’s ballot are voting YES. So many people who would generally oppose such a plan are on board with what you are calling a bad plan....Yet, you just want to vote no because it was put forth by the Broome administration or because it’s just another road tax. If that’s what you want to do, go for it. But don’t go around calling everyone who supports this tax a socialist, because nothing could’ve further from the truth.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:02 pm to Roscoe
quote:Neither you or they socialists for supporting this tax (you may be, Scruffy doesn't know), but you do have the same mindset at those who espouse socialism.
But don’t go around calling everyone who supports this tax a socialist, because nothing could’ve further from the truth.
"Don't worry. They will get it right this time. It just wasn't done right all of those other times."
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:06 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Look, someone else who refuses to hold his government accountable
So how should I hold them accountable? By voting no to a sales tax that is supposed to be used for only the projects they have stated? I voted no to the green light property tax extension due to it being a property tax
quote:
actually believes it will be different this time.
Are you talking about the green light plan?
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:07 pm to Tshiz
They need to finish what they started with the Green light program. It was the same sales pitch.
If they can't fulfill the last program I don't see why anyone thinks this one will be successful.
If they can't fulfill the last program I don't see why anyone thinks this one will be successful.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:07 pm to Napoleon
quote:
It is practically one lane eastbound after the bridge
Practically? It IS one lane there. There is only one lane that continues on, the other is an exit so it doesn’t count.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:08 pm to InflateADate
quote:You actually believe that it will only be used for the projects they stated?
By voting no to a sales tax that is supposed to be used for only the projects they have stated?
How many times do they have to trick you for you to not fall for that again?
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:08 pm to Napoleon
quote:
You have almost every street change it's names at least once. Acadian is Stanford, College is Lee and Brightside. Siegen becomes Burbank. Coursey becomes Bluebonnet. It's confusing
That's because at one time they were separate roads that were eventually connected together.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:08 pm to Roscoe
quote:
So why are all th conservative mayors in EBR parish, who are generally anti TAX, for this measure? Why is Ultra conservative Woody Jenkins for it? Why are the prominent conservative business leaders in the city supporting it? Baton Rouge Business report supporting it. Metro counsel members who originally voted against putting the measure on today’s ballot are voting YES. So many people who would generally oppose such a plan are on board with what you are calling a bad plan....Yet, you just want to vote no because it was put forth by the Broome administration or because it’s just another road tax. If that’s what you want to do, go for it. But don’t go around calling everyone who supports this tax a socialist, because nothing could’ve further from the truth.
First off, he didn't say you were a socialist so stop with the sensationalism. The administration's job is to win MY vote. Not Woody's, not the Metro Council (which by the way, is a terrible measure to latch onto), and not the media. Cool, she won over their vote. But she didn't win over MY vote or MY trust.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:11 pm to LSU-MNCBABY
Then enjoy your fricked up roads.
You people.
You people.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:14 pm to InflateADate
quote:
If you think that we don't need any more improvements in EBR parish than the 8 or so projects left on the green light plan then vote no. If you want traffic improved, then vote yes. Depends on if you enjoy our current traffic, driving on roads that need upgrades, etc.
No one likes our current situation, but until they prove they can finish what we voted on in 2005, why would you think they can take on a program about twice as large when the people in charge have shown a disregard for the tax payers((look up Silky Slim and the COA scandal), when they have proven they can't hire good prople ((look up Broome's first CAO and the Airport Directorsesrch), and then tell me these people can hire the best prople to run this program and engineer these projects.
It's going to be a huge football game with a ton of pork to hand out.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:16 pm to Roscoe
Maybe they should trim the fat and learn to spend the money they already have. Maybe spend less money on “studies” and other bs projects?
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:20 pm to Roscoe
quote:
Dont go around calling everyone who supports this tax a socialist, because nothing could’ve further from the truth.
BS
Show me where I called anyone a socialist.
I've thoroughly laid out why I oppose this tax, but I've yet to call names.
Provide a link to where I said anyone was a socialist and I will shut up.
The fact is the plan is so large and has grown so big a lot of people have bought in because there is something in it for them. And there is, with 1.1 Billion to spend I can see business people who are for and politicians who are for. I expect they will do very well.
This post was edited on 12/8/18 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:22 pm to Mr Mom
Another tax for EBR. Louisiana is already heavily taxed for crappy roads and schools
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:22 pm to Mr Mom
Much of that is valid expense. But, regardless, stand on your ideals and bounce down the road.
Stop being fricking hard heads and maybe things will improve. Indignant ignorance to capitol spending is no excuse.
Stop being fricking hard heads and maybe things will improve. Indignant ignorance to capitol spending is no excuse.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:32 pm to doubleb
quote:
until they prove they can finish what we voted on in 2005
That ends in 2030 and has about 8 projects left. If you want to wait that long then that's fine but I personally don't. I don't think those projects are the only projects we need to fully improve our situation either
No I don't fully trust the people in office but I don't think that will ever be the case. At least with this proposal there's no up front loopholes. Usually there are multiple loopholes in these proposals but I haven't seen any for this one
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:35 pm to Roscoe
quote:
So why are all th conservative mayors in EBR parish, who are generally anti TAX, for this measure?
Because people are tired of sitting in traffic and the Green Light Plan didn’t go far enough.
Popular
Back to top


1




