- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/8/21 at 9:52 am to Ingeniero
quote:
Using method 1 I would describe that as 2413.
Using method 2 i would describe that as 3142.
Make more sense now?
Yep.
I'm Method 2. Best girl is always 1. Uggos get pushed down the line as far as needed.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 9:52 am to Ingeniero
231
Posted on 7/8/21 at 10:25 am to TigerDeacon
quote:
Aren't you describing Method 1?
Yea, I read the methods once and then came back to respond later and mixed them up. Or maybe I read some responses that confused them and I rolled with it. Idk I wasn't exactly sober. I definitely use method 1 and all of my posts were explaining how that method is superior.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 10:32 am to Joshjrn
I asked a couple workers who have no idea of tigerdroppings. They all said method 2 makes more sense. Also one had an interesting point i have never seen raised. He says he would save his #2 for last to end on a high note.
This post was edited on 7/8/21 at 10:33 am
Posted on 7/8/21 at 10:34 am to Nado Jenkins83
If you want Division 1 children, 3,2,1.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 10:35 am to Ingeniero
22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
=2
=2
Posted on 7/8/21 at 10:46 am to Ingeniero
quote:
In this pic, I like the girl 2nd from the left best, then far right, then far left, then 2nd from the right.
Using method 1 I would describe that as 2413.
Using method 2 i would describe that as 3142.
Make more sense now?
This makes dramatically more sense than what was described in the OP.
I use method 1 as described here.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 10:55 am to Ingeniero
This is too easy to agree on.
The young lady on the lady is #1.
The lady in the middle is #2
And the lady on the far right is #3.
We read from left to right. We number them from left to right.
#1 is the prettiest
#2 appears to have the best rack
#3 prolly has the best rear end. We can see it.
#1 (the young lady on the left) would be my 1st round draft pick
The young lady on the lady is #1.
The lady in the middle is #2
And the lady on the far right is #3.
We read from left to right. We number them from left to right.
#1 is the prettiest
#2 appears to have the best rack
#3 prolly has the best rear end. We can see it.
#1 (the young lady on the left) would be my 1st round draft pick
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:23 am to MikeBRLA
quote:
That’s the way it’s always been for 10+ years. It comes from the WOWYHI threads. Method 1 is the WOWYHI method.
Using Method 1 only makes sense considering it is WHAT ORDER would you hit it.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:27 am to Ingeniero
1 and forget the rest.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:28 pm to Ingeniero
WTF is wrong with 3's suit? Reminds me of those atomic wedgies from middle school.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:35 pm to Ingeniero
I never heard of method 2.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:36 pm to Pfft
quote:
WTF is wrong with 3's suit
It's not in my mouth
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:40 pm to Bestbank Tiger
There is only one way to solve this. I will bring together a team of psych experts such as myself to give personality tests to all posters on both sides of this debate. Then we can see whether Method 1 or Method 2 has the most sociopathic adherents.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:53 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
There is only one way to solve this. I will bring together a team of psych experts such as myself to give personality tests to all posters on both sides of this debate. Then we can see whether Method 1 or Method 2 has the most sociopathic adherents.
"100% of each group is very disturbed..."
Posted on 7/8/21 at 1:21 pm to Ingeniero
It should be bianary…. 1 or a 0
/next?
/next?
Posted on 7/8/21 at 1:37 pm to Ingeniero
I may be an idiot. It’s certainly a possibility and my Bama degree might be used as evidence. But I am as confused by this post as any that I’ve ever read. I don’t follow the logic of method 1. Its not that I just disagree with it (which I think I do) but I simply don’t understand it. And, moreover, it’s never once crossed my mind that there could be another way of doing it that what I understand to be laid out in method 2.
I’m legitimately confused.
I’m legitimately confused.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 1:40 pm to Ingeniero
All these years I've used method 2.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 2:43 pm to Ingeniero
Is there a different method for pictures that just rate all by looks versus order one would hit it/them if at all?
I have seen some in pictures that get extra times before poster moves on to another or even have poster come back for 2nds or 3rds or more at the end, and also posters who leave off those considered not hitable completely which is why i always thought it was method one.
Not all pictures are like example. Some pictures are a mix of what order along with including some that are more would you at all.
I have seen some in pictures that get extra times before poster moves on to another or even have poster come back for 2nds or 3rds or more at the end, and also posters who leave off those considered not hitable completely which is why i always thought it was method one.
Not all pictures are like example. Some pictures are a mix of what order along with including some that are more would you at all.
Page 7 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News