Started By
Message

re: Very important: what is the proper numbering system for ranking a pic? (NSFW)

Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:42 pm to
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59622 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:42 pm to
Sometimes you gotta play it close to the vest.
Posted by Eat Your Crow
caught beneath the landslide
Member since May 2017
9190 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:43 pm to
frick Method 2
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89846 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

Method 2: work from left to right and assign a priority as they stand

So for the pic above, 312 would mean left is worst, middle is best, right is in between.


Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59622 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:47 pm to
Method 1 is for commies
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101919 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:48 pm to
Method 1 is the way.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15294 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:51 pm to
Method 1: 3,2,1.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37491 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Method 2: work from left to right and assign a priority as they stand So for the pic above, 312 would mean left is worst, middle is best, right is in between.


The only logical way. Way Number 1 makes less than no sense. It’s absolutely idiotic, as are you for supporting it.

quote:

count up from left to right and rank from highest priority to lowest using those numbers So for the pic above, 312 would mean right is best, left is in between, middle is worst.


In what world does this make sense. Assign the number to the woman in their current position. Don’t make me jump back and forth to figure who the hell is who
This post was edited on 7/7/21 at 9:56 pm
Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:54 pm to
Now that I've thought about it, method 1 is easier to write down, but method 2 is easier for the reader.
Posted by Eat Your Crow
caught beneath the landslide
Member since May 2017
9190 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Oilfieldbiology

You are wrong. Sorry bud.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101919 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:57 pm to
Never mind.
This post was edited on 7/7/21 at 9:58 pm
Posted by Hobie101
Member since May 2012
470 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 9:59 pm to
Yes
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15294 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 10:04 pm to
Apparently this has the OT pretty divided.

I have honestly never even considered option 2. Option 1 makes the most sense in my head.
Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3634 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 10:11 pm to
Yeah I thought this was well established. Numbers are assigned left to right. So in that picture 1 is the far left, 2 is the middle gal, then 3 is on the right. Once the numbers have been assigned you place the numbers/girls in order you would like to have relations with them

2,3,1

And 1 is last because her body looks like a young boys. Only the perverts would pick her first.
Posted by DeltaTigerDelta
Member since Jan 2017
11287 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 10:13 pm to
The one on the far right in the blue suit has the best arse. Hope she is of legal age.
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 10:13 pm to
Method two is the best.

Method one is for knuckle dragging non-AP class people.
Posted by Bawcephus
Member since Jul 2018
2747 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 10:18 pm to
+1 for method 2.

Method #1 involves unnecessary steps, therefore it's common core math.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62935 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 10:20 pm to
Option 2 is how you would do it if you knew the names of all the girls. You might rank them

1st place: Sandy (girl 3)
2nd place: Candy (girl 1)
3rd place: Mandy (girl 2)

So saying 312 is much more intuitive.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 10:28 pm to
I knew there were sociopath on this board but had no idea method 2 was a thing, and is apparently supported by such a large group of sociopaths here. Pretty eye opening IMO
Posted by LSU Delirium
Member since Aug 2013
443 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 10:32 pm to
This like the blue vs. gold dress thing. It took me multiple times reading method 1 to understand what you were saying. Obviously I’m method 2, but this explains so much….
Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

This like the blue vs. gold dress thing. It took me multiple times reading method 1 to understand what you were saying. Obviously I’m method 2, but this explains so much….


I had those exact thoughts.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram