- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UPDATE: The OT's Own Stormy Daniels Received $130k From Trump's Lawyers
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:19 pm to AFtigerFan
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:19 pm to AFtigerFan
quote:
A girl I was "dating" was a dancer at Rick's, and her sister was a dancer at the Gold Club
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:35 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
What was her user name
StormyDaniels
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:37 pm to Ace Midnight
Everything after Pyromania was horrible 
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:46 pm to andwesway
quote:
andwesway
You went to SMHS? Me too!
Posted on 1/12/18 at 9:47 pm to OweO
Actually, beyond their editorial page, the WSJ has always been very liberal. They've been big proponents of full decriminalization of all drugs, unmitigated support for amnesty & open borders and their support of Hillary Clinton.
The only recent redeeming investigation from the WSJ was into Saints "Bountygate" accusations, which concluded the Saints effectively framed by the NFL and its paid stooge, former FBI director Louis Freeh. Saints were among least penalized teams under Payton and had the lowest rate of personal fouls in the league in 2009. So the WSJ isn't all bad (but still liberal).
The only recent redeeming investigation from the WSJ was into Saints "Bountygate" accusations, which concluded the Saints effectively framed by the NFL and its paid stooge, former FBI director Louis Freeh. Saints were among least penalized teams under Payton and had the lowest rate of personal fouls in the league in 2009. So the WSJ isn't all bad (but still liberal).
Posted on 1/12/18 at 11:31 pm to GoIrish02
I heard Trump wanted anal...or as he called it, " The Haitian Special."
True story..my sister beat her arse at Calloway's once.
True story..my sister beat her arse at Calloway's once.
Posted on 1/13/18 at 1:09 pm to vjp819
nice try the WSJ is owned by Rupert Murdoch. Hardy "liberal media"
Posted on 1/13/18 at 1:12 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
True story..my sister beat her arse at Calloway's once.
I know we all grew up together and stuff but I would totally eat your sister's arse.
Posted on 1/13/18 at 1:12 pm to CCTider
get a clue and google WSJ.That about a conservative publication as you will find
Posted on 1/13/18 at 1:13 pm to siberian tiger
quote:
nice try the WSJ is owned by Rupert Murdoch. Hardy "liberal media"
I did not know this. I just googled and I see he purchased it in 2007 for $5B. I don't know many "liberals" who subscribe to WSJ...
That jackass doesn't know what he is talking about.
Posted on 1/13/18 at 1:14 pm to AFtigerFan
quote:
A girl I was "dating" was a dancer at Rick's, and her sister was a dancer at the Gold Club
Did either one of them go to SLU at the time?
Posted on 1/13/18 at 1:24 pm to GoIrish02
quote:
WSJ has always been very liberal.
lol
Posted on 1/13/18 at 1:28 pm to GoIrish02
If the wsj is too liberal for you then you're somewhere right of Stalin.
This post was edited on 1/13/18 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 1/13/18 at 2:49 pm to OweO
quote:
Did either one of them go to SLU at the time?
The one I was dating did not. I'm not sure if her older sister did.
Posted on 1/13/18 at 2:52 pm to mikelbr
You knew Stephanie as well?
Wish I had pics from her awkward goth-like phase at SMHS
She was always nice to me though.
Wish I had pics from her awkward goth-like phase at SMHS
She was always nice to me though.
Posted on 1/13/18 at 3:02 pm to lsunurse
quote:
ou knew Stephanie as well?
Mikes was probably too busy chasing after her little brother to remember much about Stephanie.
Posted on 1/14/18 at 11:13 pm to siberian tiger
quote:
get a clue and google WSJ.That about a conservative publication as you will find
BS. Fake news. There's no way a Rupert Murdoch publication has a conservative slant.
Popular
Back to top



0








