Started By
Message

re: Update: Alleged Perp in custody: Garret James Ward of BR for 2nd Degree murder

Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:12 pm to
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11821 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

No, not really, sorry. ‘He was panhandling’ isn’t a legitimate defense to Kicking a guys head in


The only place stated to have blood was Ward’s hands. At least in this thread.
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6115 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:12 pm to
Ok I've got to say 1st, if this is true, frick Ward and let him rot for a majority of his good years on this earth.

2nd and maybe most important of all, if it was this bad then obviously the cops knew it was this bad from the second degree battery charge the night of, yet the judge set a 10k bond and let him right back on the street while a man was left clinging to life. On what world does this make sense or is NO court system just full of the biggest pieces of shite that society could drum up? Seriously, you have a witness statement that this guy did all that and they let him out hrs after with a bail similar to reckless driving or theft? I'm not saying he should have been denied any rights to bail but 10k after that? Just blows my mind. I had to bail a friend out of Morgan City on DUI 1st offense and judge set bond at 2,500 and held him 48 hrs bc we disturbed his fishing. Someone needs to set fire to the entire city of New Orleans and start over.

And I say all this only if what the witnesses are saying happened actually happened. But even then that is pretty much all the judge had to go on and still said frick it, 10k and you can head home. See you in court in a couple months bro.
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 10:16 pm
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
108348 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:12 pm to
Yep. That won't pass mustard in court.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28424 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:13 pm to
I see where you’re coming from, but I respectfully disagree. I can certainly understand feeling “threatened” by pandhanders depending on the context, time, and location. Does it give One the right to kill a man? Probably not, but it absolutely in my mind lessens the moral blame of the culprit relative to beating a completely innocent bystander to death.

Do I think it’s a defense to get off free and clear? No, of course not...I’m just saying In the minds of a reasonable person the victim certainly in some way contributed to his own demise if he in any way instigated the entire interaction, whether by panhandling or whatever.
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 10:20 pm
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64368 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

I see where you’re coming from, but I respectfully disagree. I can certainly understand feeling “threatened” by pandhanders depending on the context, time, and location. Does it give One the right to kill a man? Probably not, but it absolutely in my mind lessens the moral blame of the culprit relative to beating a completely innocent bystander to death.


You can't just assault someone on a public street for feeling "threatened" unless you're physically attacked. There's lots of nefarious looking people in the world, but I can't just attack them because of what I think they could do.
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 10:19 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

So we’ve had witness claim that the victim was attacked while breaking up a dispute between Garrett and an unknown female


We've had no witness reports say this, fwiw. That's been hearsay from the daughter and ex wife of Red.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28424 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:25 pm to
Yeah, but if I was judge jury and executioner I’m handing down a lighter sentence if the victim in any way contributed to the altercation.

That may not be how the law works, but that’s how my mind works, and id imagine most minds work... less blame is warranted if the victim shares some degree of blame.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64368 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Yeah, but if I was judge jury and executioner I’m handing down a lighter sentence if the victim in any way contributed to the altercation.


What exactly constitutes "contributing" for this particular case, in your opinion?

What if Jackson just said a lot of really really harsh words to Ward? Would that justify Ward's actions?
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 10:29 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:31 pm to
There are appropriate actions and there are inappropriate actions. If you're intimidated by a panhandler, don't start throwing punches.

And if you start throwing punches then ultimately kick the guy in the head on the ground, you've gone well above whatever mitigating circumstances there were to start.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28424 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:33 pm to
I don’t think harsh words would “justify” Ward’s actions, but I absolutely think it would/should lessen his overall culpability.

If the victim in any way contributed to his own demise, it IMO should lessen the blame/sentence to defendant. Laying out that sliding scale would be difficult and certainly have lots of gray areas for interpretation, but my main point would be that it would absolutely lessen, not eliminate, the defendant’s responsibility.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

see where you’re coming from, but I respectfully disagree. I can certainly understand feeling “threatened” by pandhanders depending on the context, time, and location. Does it give One the right to kill a man? Probably not, but it absolutely in my mind lessens the moral blame of the culprit relative to beating a completely innocent bystander to death.

Do I think it’s a defense to get off free and clear? No, of course not...I’m just saying In the minds of a reasonable person the victim certainly in some way contributed to his own demise if he in any way instigated the entire interaction, whether by panhandling or whatever.


Lol Jesus dude. Grow a pair. Unless he was swinging or his lauguage, body or spoken, implied he was about to, "agressive panhandling" isn't instigating a fight. Certainly not one where a 60 year old gets kicked at least twice in the head while on the ground.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

If the victim in any way contributed to his own demise


By "aggressive panhandling"? Man you must think rape victims deserve blame because they dressed in skimpy clothes.
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 10:42 pm
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30512 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

I don’t think harsh words would “justify” Ward’s actions, but I absolutely think it would/should lessen his overall culpability


You have me curious.

All the "facts" indicate Ward committed 2nd degree murder. That carries a life w/o parole sentence in LA, not a range just life.

Let's say Red addressed Ward with the worst possible couple of sentences you can possibly imagine. How much off "life" (lets assume that is around 50 years for Ward) would you shave off.
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:41 pm to
Jesus Christ....... Arnold Jackson wasn’t a fricking panhandler. He was known around that area as he would walk that area daily. I jog the neutral ground in the evenings from the Ponchatrain Expy to Napoleon. I’ve seen him out there a bunch of times. He’s usually just by himself or talking to the bell staff at Hotel Indigo. He was quite frail too. I don’t believe for a second that he started anything with Ward. There’s a woman that was mentioned by every witness so far. Ward better hope she’s on his side or she’s going to send him to jail for a long time.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9373 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

How many people do you know crazy enough, or mean enough, to kill weak 60 year old men with their bare hands? I am not saying he will intimaidate other prisoners, I am saying he has a potential psychotic tendency that may make a prisoner who messes with him regret it


Jeffrey Dhamer was not tiny and raped other dudes in the Army. He had what you would consider psychotic tendencies and he got his arse beat to death in prison so...theres always a bigger fish
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

Jesus Christ....... Arnold Jackson wasn’t a fricking panhandler. He was known around that area as he would walk that area daily. I jog the neutral ground in the evenings from the Ponchatrain Expy to Napoleon. I’ve seen him out there a bunch of times. He’s usually just by himself or talking to the bell staff at Hotel Indigo. He was quite frail too. I don’t believe for a second that he started anything with Ward. There’s a woman that was mentioned by every witness so far. Ward better hope she’s on his side or she’s going to send him to jail for a long time.


If true, then shite just got interesting.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64368 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

Jesus Christ....... Arnold Jackson wasn’t a fricking panhandler. He was known around that area as he would walk that area daily. I jog the neutral ground in the evenings from the Ponchatrain Expy to Napoleon. I’ve seen him out there a bunch of times. He’s usually just by himself or talking to the bell staff at Hotel Indigo. He was quite frail too. I don’t believe for a second that he started anything with Ward. There’s a woman that was mentioned by every witness so far. Ward better hope she’s on his side or she’s going to send him to jail for a long time.



Damn, nice addition. Basically what's being reported. Guy was known in the area, just minding his own business.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28424 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:44 pm to
I think you misunderstood me...let me put it this way, which is worse?...

A) joe beats a completely innocent random bystander to death

B) joe beats a panhandler that threatened him to death

I’m not saying Joe is innocent or justified in either case, neither is good and Joe is in some trouble in both instances, but I’m pretty sure most reasonable people would say that A is worse and deserves a harsher penalty than B.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

B) joe beats a panhandler that threatened him to death



That's one small step for man, one GIANT LEAP for mankind
Posted by jefforize
Member since Feb 2008
45903 posts
Posted on 1/25/18 at 10:48 pm to
This dude really beat a friendly frail old man to death, in his own neighborhood
Jump to page
Page First 115 116 117 118 119 ... 127
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 117 of 127Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram