- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Uh oh OT, an even more effective weight loss drug in testing..a pill this time
Posted on 9/11/24 at 3:14 pm to ShoeBang
Posted on 9/11/24 at 3:14 pm to ShoeBang
quote:
You’ll be able to tell by the folds of loose skin in weird places and drawn back face that makes them look like they just got done with chemo treatments
Don't forget the thinning hair.
1
Posted on 9/11/24 at 3:20 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
Don't forget the thinning hair.
Worth it. I look sexy bald, if I were skinnier.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 3:37 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
It was the 00's and the FDA never approved rimonabant in the first place.
Looks like my age is starting to show. I was thinking it was much earlier and got the widespread approvals they were seeking. For a month or so there was a new article daily just about daily about another country being applied to or another trial in yet another. (the EU covered 25 countries)
I know that in the Bush administration there was an anti drug push, mainly pot of course, by AG Ashcroft who advocated research into chemically blocking intoxication. (the same nutcase that covered the statue of Justice in the briefing room due to nudity)
Who would think that blocking the receptors for the world’s first known non protein hormone with the knowledge that the receptors are located throughout the body would cause a problem? 5 dead in the studies (although 1 was from gunshot they couldn’t be sure it’s suicide as he was in witness protection too)
Posted on 9/11/24 at 3:40 pm to CAD703X
We should bring back smoking for weight control at least cigs would give you a buzz every once and a while
Posted on 9/11/24 at 4:01 pm to DMagic
quote:
We should bring back smoking for weight control at least cigs would give you a buzz every once and a while
It would likely work just as well as the various weight loss drugs at a fraction of the price and while the health implications are there, we don't know the long term effects of these other drugs.
When it's all said and done it's a matter of pick your poison.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 4:01 pm to DMagic
OT will all look like cancer patients as soon as amycretin peptides are available.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 5:18 pm to CAD703X
I once knew an Amy that was an absolute cretin.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 5:28 pm to CAD703X
quote:
What are y'all going to do when you can't tell if the chick you're trying to date is on it?
Wouldn't care. If they ain't fat they ain't fat
Posted on 9/11/24 at 6:20 pm to Ricardo
quote:
I think for a lot of people it's just an oral fixation. This is why people who quit smoking tend to gain weight. They replace cigarettes with snacking.
Also comes from actually being able to taste food again.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:46 pm to lsu777
Why has nobody tried to make a diet pill based off dnp? Why not hook the molecule to an amino acid that has a bond that has to be metabolized by the liver to release the active ingredient like vyvanse?
Posted on 9/12/24 at 12:50 pm to Ricardo
quote:
It would likely work just as well as the various weight loss drugs at a fraction of the price and while the health implications are there, we don't know the long term effects of these other drugs. When it's all said and done it's a matter of pick your poison.
Cigarettes don’t cause cancer
The government spread that myth because cigarettes raise testosterone
Posted on 9/12/24 at 1:05 pm to el Gaucho
You are probably right. (I know you’re kidding.)
The thing is: life expectancy hasn’t drastically improved since the 90s. People seem to die around 80 on average no matter what medical science does. If anything, younger people are getting diagnosed with cancer than in the past.
The thing is: life expectancy hasn’t drastically improved since the 90s. People seem to die around 80 on average no matter what medical science does. If anything, younger people are getting diagnosed with cancer than in the past.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 1:07 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
Why has nobody tried to make a diet pill based off dnp? Why not hook the molecule to an amino acid that has a bond that has to be metabolized by the liver to release the active ingredient like vyvanse?
because the side effects of uncoupling agents is death if you take too much and with the extreme long half life, it is easy for people to over do it as its not a set amount, it depends on frequency, hydration levels, temperature the person is in(i.e. if its hot outside easier to cook your insides) etc etc
ramping the metabolism more than 8-10% is prolly not a good idea in the long run.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News