- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Twitter/X profit has doubled since Elon bought it and took it private
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:29 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

Remember how people said Elon would bankrupt it in a few short years?
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:31 pm to stout
Libtards right now...

This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:31 pm to stout
I regret not bookmarking a number of posts from back then.
If anyone has em….
If anyone has em….
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:31 pm to stout
Well, he is the dumbest billionaire that AOC has ever met.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:31 pm to stout
Yeah but all the libs use blue sky now
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:33 pm to LSUnation78
quote:
I regret not bookmarking a number of posts from back then.
Dummy c on z was 100% confident X would be gone within a year
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:34 pm to stout
Elon: World’s number 1 African American!
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:35 pm to ruzil
quote:
Well like, he’s like the dumbest billionaire that the AOC, former bartender, has like met, well not like met but like heard of. duh!
FIFY
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:36 pm to stout
Half the revenue, double the profit. That's how much wasteful spending was going on. Wild.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:37 pm to stout
quote:
Remember how people said Elon would bankrupt it in a few short years?
I remember. None will entertain this thread, but if they do, it will be to question the exact numbers of profit or to whine about DOGE cutting their funding
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:39 pm to stout
it was never not going to be a big money maker for elon, and that's with these gobs of advertisers that are just now starting to come back and advertise.
From a real-time perspective, there is literally no place better to find up to the second information.
Cut costs very aggressively and run lean.
From a real-time perspective, there is literally no place better to find up to the second information.
Cut costs very aggressively and run lean.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:40 pm to LSUnation78
quote:
I regret not bookmarking a number of posts from back then.
If anyone has em….
I was skeptical when he overpaid and the advertisers were abandoning Twitter.
Then a few things happened:
1. Elon got a cash infusion form Larry Ellison. (Elon could have done it himself but that would have required liquidating some of his Space X and Tesla assets and that is not only a bad look but using his own money would NOT be doing his fiduciary duty for his investors.)
2. Elon opened up X to the formally banned. This really expanded growth.
3. The advertisers came back because they figured out that X is the place to reach an audience.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:42 pm to WONTONGO
quote:
Half the revenue, double the profit. That's how much wasteful spending was going on. Wild
This is all you need to know understand who is freaking out about DOGE and why.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 12:42 pm to stout
misleading, especially when Musk himself said how bad their financial strait is
Only after cutting costs to the bones, twitters earnings ($1.2 billion) are basically equal to its annual debt interest payments—meaning it’s barely breaking even. so, there’s not much room for growth unless X can sell more ads (which consists of 90% of Twitter's revenue). the active user number has been stagnant for 2 years btw
LINK /
“The debt is being pitched with a set of financials showing roughly $1.2 billion of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization in 2024, according to people familiar with the matter. That includes about $400 million of EBITDA on $710 million of revenue in the final three months of the year, an increase from the two preceding quarters that indicates an election-related bump for the social media platform.”
Though that’s, reportedly, what Musk has been pushing, with recent reports suggesting that Musk has sought to motivate X staff to do more, noting in a recent all-staff email that “user growth is stagnant, revenue is unimpressive, and we’re barely breaking even.”
That aligns with the above notes on X’s finances, though Musk himself denies that he ever sent this message.

Only after cutting costs to the bones, twitters earnings ($1.2 billion) are basically equal to its annual debt interest payments—meaning it’s barely breaking even. so, there’s not much room for growth unless X can sell more ads (which consists of 90% of Twitter's revenue). the active user number has been stagnant for 2 years btw
LINK /
“The debt is being pitched with a set of financials showing roughly $1.2 billion of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization in 2024, according to people familiar with the matter. That includes about $400 million of EBITDA on $710 million of revenue in the final three months of the year, an increase from the two preceding quarters that indicates an election-related bump for the social media platform.”
Though that’s, reportedly, what Musk has been pushing, with recent reports suggesting that Musk has sought to motivate X staff to do more, noting in a recent all-staff email that “user growth is stagnant, revenue is unimpressive, and we’re barely breaking even.”
That aligns with the above notes on X’s finances, though Musk himself denies that he ever sent this message.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 1:07 pm to stout
quote:
Dummy c on z was 100% confident X would be gone within a year
the most confusing point of all the lefts melts about Elon and Twitter is the fact that is was known that Twitter hadn’t been profitable, currently wasn’t profitable, and had no route to profitability when Musk acquired it.
it was already just bleeding money, so anything Musk did or does to it can only help. if at worst it does go under (doesn’t seem likely now), it would have been back to where it was headed from the start.
but instead the purchase also got him a platform with direct access to the President, which has an ROI that can’t even be calculated for how good it is across all of his businesses
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 6:15 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 2:19 pm to stout
quote:
Dummy c on z
Not bringing their best
Posted on 2/6/25 at 2:22 pm to JimTiger72
No they don’t, those bitches are still all over X. They just use blue sky to communicate their terror threats.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 3:55 pm to stout
I'd have to super dig to see if that's accurate, because the media is absolutely dog shite at reading financials.
Popular
Back to top
