- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:30 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
These are the people who eliminated the filibuster, because they couldn't imagine a day when they wouldn't control the Senate.
That's one of the reasons I think they're so dangerous. Nancy is also drunk half the time.
They also enacted the nuclear option then said Republicans should be ousted for using it. Their entire party is founded on projection and hypocrisy
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:30 pm to saintforlife1
You know ol’ one-term Donnie is fricking BIG MAD about this, as the kids would say. Lmfao. 
He fricked around, and found out. SAD!
He fricked around, and found out. SAD!
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:31 pm to MikeBRLA
quote:
So open to other people’s views.
Tolerant of their own intolerance and not much else besides themselves.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:31 pm to PhilipMarlowe
Ya bro! We should ban anyone who doesn't Think Correctly!
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:31 pm to Centinel
quote:
Twitter/Facebook are nowhere near the same as this website.
Agreed, but the have they same liability protection under 230.
This post was edited on 1/8/21 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:31 pm to PhilipMarlowe
quote:
He fricked around, and found out. SAD!
If you think this isn't going to trickle down to the average Joe, then you're in for a rude awakening
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:31 pm to saintforlife1
Thought control
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:31 pm to billjamin
quote:
Agreed, but the have the same liability protection under 230.
Thank you for making my point why Twitter and Facebook shouldn't have that protection.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:32 pm to Centinel
quote:
I don't want private companies deciding what is or is not allowed speech.
What? So you want the government to tell private companies how they should be ran? Because if you don't want private companies deciding what is or is not allowed speech (I assume you mean free speech) then there would have to be some type of law that would force companies to allow anyone to use their service to say whatever they want.
So what happens when someone uses that platform to do harm to a person. Who would be legally responsible? The company? Or the government for not allowing that company to be able to stop any type of harmful activity?
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:32 pm to Jyrdis
How many entendres are in that one statement?
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:33 pm to Centinel
quote:
Thank you for making my point why Twitter and Facebook shouldn't have that protection.
I don’t have much of an opinion on it because I don’t really care about Twitter or FB. Regardless, revoking has a lot of downstream implications that many don’t think about.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:34 pm to OweO
quote:like voting for Biden/Dems who want to tell a baker he has to make a gay wedding cake
What? So you want the government to tell private companies how they should be ran? Because if you don't want private companies deciding what is or is not allowed speech (I assume you mean free speech) then there would have to be some type of law that would force companies to allow anyone to use their service to say whatever they want.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:35 pm to Centinel
quote:
It's certainly as turbulent as 1968 at the minimum.
I’ll put it this way: I predicted the riots back in April. It was on my mind that they may happen, and my proof is my It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia thread with “The Gang Goes Purging”. While last year was the year of IASIP, this is the year of Joker, only its going to be nationwide. Buckle up, it’s going to be horrible and violent.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:35 pm to OweO
quote:
So what happens when someone uses that platform to do harm to a person.
The person contributing to the harm would be charged under the relevant existing statute?
quote:
Who would be legally responsible?
The person who did harm?
Can you even string together a coherent thought?
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:36 pm to saintforlife1
I am sure already posted.
But from Babylonbee
But from Babylonbee
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:37 pm to dallastigers
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:37 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Buckle up, it’s going to be horrible and violent.
I agree. And I look forward to it. This country's majority population needs to be reminded what the human condition has been like for the past 100k years.
Maybe it will refocus their priorities on what matters instead of emotional bullshite.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:37 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
like voting for Biden/Dems who want to tell a baker he has to make a gay wedding cake
I actually don't agree with either. I think Twitter should be able to ban Trump and I also think the bakery should have been able to tell the gay couple to go frick off. The left only agrees when it fits their narrative though.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 6:37 pm to saintforlife1
The day Twitter dies is going to be a great day for humanity
Page 9 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News