- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Together BR, teacher union: Deny all industrial tax exemptions
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:55 am to upgrayedd
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:55 am to upgrayedd
let's push out Exxon, Dow, IBM, etc. The cost of those tax breaks alone means we get raises yall!
Great idea guuurl, now, let's head on down to Picadilly. It's $1 chicken wings night. Meeting adjourned !!!
fricking idiots.
Great idea guuurl, now, let's head on down to Picadilly. It's $1 chicken wings night. Meeting adjourned !!!
fricking idiots.
This post was edited on 5/9/18 at 10:00 am
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:56 am to upgrayedd
The issue of corporate tax breaks is an interesting question.
1) Let’s assume that the intended purpose of any corporate tax break is to encourage a particular business to locate and/or not leave the taxing area. (Leave out corruption and cronyism for this discussion).
2) Furthermore, let’s assume there is no competitor in the taxing area that is getting disadvantaged by the tax break to their competition.
3) Let’s also assume that without the tax break, the business will not come, and/or will leave, or won’t expand to increase jobs and tax revenue.
At that point, I think it’s simply a mathematical question for a community. Does the benefit of the tax break outweigh the loss in tax revenue?
The devil, then, is in the details of the assumptions made, not in the practice itself.
1) Let’s assume that the intended purpose of any corporate tax break is to encourage a particular business to locate and/or not leave the taxing area. (Leave out corruption and cronyism for this discussion).
2) Furthermore, let’s assume there is no competitor in the taxing area that is getting disadvantaged by the tax break to their competition.
3) Let’s also assume that without the tax break, the business will not come, and/or will leave, or won’t expand to increase jobs and tax revenue.
At that point, I think it’s simply a mathematical question for a community. Does the benefit of the tax break outweigh the loss in tax revenue?
The devil, then, is in the details of the assumptions made, not in the practice itself.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:56 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Why don’t we get rid of all business exemptions and then just lower the overall business tax rate? Why do some industries get these goodies and others dont?
The gulf coast is oil and gas country. For some project (say, a major petrochemical investment), the land value will 'improve' drastically well before any revenue starts appearing.
If you bought a plot of land now with the intent of putting a refinery/chemical plant on it, you wouldn't get any money back from it until 2030.
It's not a revamp of an old building that you can flip in 6 months and start collecting revenue.
ITEP puts off having to pay the property tax on that land until it's closer (or is) making money. In addition, with all of that metal in the ground, it now becomes a stable source of employment for the foreseeable future (as opposed to that restaurant that flipped in 6 months).
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:57 am to jimjackandjose
quote:
By dropping tax exemption, they will have 0 dollars to disperse because no one will build facilities here.
Aren't we last in every economic category. To quote our CINC, at this point what do we have to lose?
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:58 am to NYCAuburn
quote:You can’t increase pay without increasing requirements.
You need to pay them first before you are going to attract them. Its kind of hard to be selective when you offer is 30-40k.
They need to at least happen at the same time.
Scruffy wages that a majority of teachers are not worthy of a significant pay raise.
They also wouldn’t like the outcome considering that many of them would likely lose their jobs or will be replaced by someone far more qualified.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:58 am to Klark Kent
quote:
let's push out Exxon, Dow, IBM, etc. Those tax cuts we get in return will mean raises yall!
That's speaking truth to power
Posted on 5/9/18 at 9:59 am to upgrayedd
Dang I didn’t realize teachers made 40 bucks an hour
That’s like working at a plant, you still get to watch movies but you only have to worry about the kids blowing up
That’s like working at a plant, you still get to watch movies but you only have to worry about the kids blowing up
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:01 am to upgrayedd
Yeah good luck to them with that.
Potential St George residents may not be able to smack them down. Exxon Mobil, Dow, et all though? They will not be impressed.
Potential St George residents may not be able to smack them down. Exxon Mobil, Dow, et all though? They will not be impressed.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:01 am to upgrayedd
it's like they are attempting to push out everything to do with capitalism in BR with their industrial tax exemptions cut ideas and cries to only give tax breaks to business owners in NBR.
ohh wait, they are. so that when it all comes crashing down. which it will. they'll simply turn around and either ask the white middle class to bail them out or the federal government.
Here's a t-shirt idea for them:
"Let's bankrupt BR: to get more handouts yall"
ohh wait, they are. so that when it all comes crashing down. which it will. they'll simply turn around and either ask the white middle class to bail them out or the federal government.
Here's a t-shirt idea for them:
"Let's bankrupt BR: to get more handouts yall"
This post was edited on 5/9/18 at 10:05 am
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:02 am to upgrayedd
2 years ago the School Board asked EBR Parish taxpayers to trust them with a penny sales tax increase. We did. That penny was to go to new schools, and school upgrades (it did and they are very nice), for discipline and for teacher pay raises so the talent pool could be improved.
I have seen no sign that overall we've gotten better teachers.
EBR spends more money than many per student; yet our system is a mixed bag. We have some great schools and great students; however, we have too many poor schools, and too many poor test scores.
Money hasn't helped the overall system. Teachers crying for more raises less than a month after folks just renewed the one cent tax is pathetic. They waited until after the vote to bitch knowing voters were not too involved in the last election.
I have yet to see the Teacher's Union offer good, sound suggestions to improve the schools or their profession other than more money for them. They never push teacher standards and accountability because they know too many of them are just not that good.
I have seen no sign that overall we've gotten better teachers.
EBR spends more money than many per student; yet our system is a mixed bag. We have some great schools and great students; however, we have too many poor schools, and too many poor test scores.
Money hasn't helped the overall system. Teachers crying for more raises less than a month after folks just renewed the one cent tax is pathetic. They waited until after the vote to bitch knowing voters were not too involved in the last election.
I have yet to see the Teacher's Union offer good, sound suggestions to improve the schools or their profession other than more money for them. They never push teacher standards and accountability because they know too many of them are just not that good.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:03 am to Scruffy
quote:
You can’t increase pay without increasing requirements.
Well yeah you can and its much easier than doing it the opposite way. The problem is you are paying some people above what they should be paid, but you just up your requirements to keep jobs and they will be forced to comply or be replaced.
quote:
Scruffy wages that a majority of teachers are not worthy of a significant pay raise
its pretty sad that we dont value our educators more in this country, we are slipping behind and it will catch us in the next 50 years bad.
quote:
They also wouldn’t like the outcome considering that many of them would likely lose their jobs or will be replaced by someone far more qualified.
Forced to better themselves or move on, it is what it is. Feelings of someone shouldnt be taken in account if they are not qualified
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:06 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
its pretty sad that we dont value our educators more in this country, we are slipping behind and it will catch us in the next 50 years bad
what? so you're saying the next generation with their tide pod eating, spray can deodorant burning challenges, and butt chugging will set the overall American progress back?
we're fricked.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:07 am to Scruffy
quote:
You can’t increase pay without increasing requirements.
They need to at least happen at the same time.
Scruffy wages that a majority of teachers are not worthy of a significant pay raise.
This isn't isolated to teachers, it's the case with most government workers.
Are government workers not good employees because they don't get paid enough, so they aren't attracting talent? Or are the existing ones not deserving of pay increases?
You can put yourself in a bind with that logic. Because if you acknowledge that you could get better talent with more pay, but don't want to pay the existing employees more, then you are just stuck with the status quo.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:07 am to upgrayedd
Denying the industrial incentives often means you won’t be collecting tax anyway. Since they won’t be expanding or investing there in the first place.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:09 am to NYCAuburn
quote:That is increasing both concurrently.
Well yeah you can and its much easier than doing it the opposite way. The problem is you are paying some people above what they should be paid, but you just up your requirements to keep jobs and they will be forced to comply or be replaced.
quote:Value?
its pretty sad that we dont value our educators more in this country, we are slipping behind and it will catch us in the next 50 years bad.
You seem to have this idea that people reject teachers outright. That isn’t true.
The profession has been failing the children of this country for decades.
These opinions have basis in fact.
quote:Agreed. That is antithetical to the concept of all unions though.
Feelings of someone shouldnt be taken in account if they are not qualified
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:09 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Why don’t we get rid of all business exemptions and then just lower the overall business tax rate? Why do some industries get these goodies and others dont?
I am all for this. I'm sick of the government picking winners and losers.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:11 am to jimjackandjose
quote:
By dropping tax exemption, they will have 0 dollars to disperse because no one will build facilities here.
Bingo.
And that's an inconvenient truth by people demanding these exemptions. They assume that those facilities would come either way.
Amazon isn't building anywhere without a massive tax incentive. Even broke arse Chicago is offering over $2 billion in rebates and incentives to lure them.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:14 am to upgrayedd
Together BR has morphed into a radical anti-business political group.
And Teacher Unions have proved time and time again just how disconnected from economic reality they really are.
And Teacher Unions have proved time and time again just how disconnected from economic reality they really are.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:14 am to upgrayedd
The teachers have nothing to do with how good or how poorly the school performs. Demographics of the school mean everything. You have to have parents that give a shite about education and don’t look at the schools as daycares so they can do crack and breed with random strangers in the neighborhood all day.
I’m not saying they need a raise. 52k a year seems pretty reasonable when considering COL in the BR area. The teachers that really need pay bumps are the ones in rural parishes who are earning 39-43k a year. Also, teachers are accountable for EVERYTHING a student does or does not do in class. Write Jamal up for misbehaving in class? “Well, what were you doing as a teacher that left him so bored where he needed to act out for entertainment”
Nobody on this board, myself included, would trade your current occupation and salary to be a teacher.
I’m not saying they need a raise. 52k a year seems pretty reasonable when considering COL in the BR area. The teachers that really need pay bumps are the ones in rural parishes who are earning 39-43k a year. Also, teachers are accountable for EVERYTHING a student does or does not do in class. Write Jamal up for misbehaving in class? “Well, what were you doing as a teacher that left him so bored where he needed to act out for entertainment”
Nobody on this board, myself included, would trade your current occupation and salary to be a teacher.
This post was edited on 5/9/18 at 10:15 am
Posted on 5/9/18 at 10:16 am to upgrayedd
quote:
free healthcare and retirement
You were doing well until you went full retard with this tidbit.
If you think teacher's salary is commensurate with their workload then I assume you don't know any good teachers.
That being said, Together Baton Rouge is a terrorist organization led by morons, and this ITEP idea is terrible.
Popular
Back to top


1








