- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Time to rethink how students should react to school shooters?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:38 am to prplhze2000
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:38 am to prplhze2000
quote:
$45K is average
And like I just edited in, is $11k less than the US average.
No need to call me a dumb frick just because the suggestion of wasting more money training teachers to be able to handle something that’s only happened 31 times in the last 20 years isn’t smart.
Especially when the district received an F grade showing that the money could be much more useful elsewhere. “Well, my kids are dumb as shite, but at least the teacher has a gun on the very rare chance some kid decides to shoot the school up.”
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:40 am to prplhze2000
quote:
Teacher or district can pay for it.
Yeah I would expect teachers to just line up to spend some of that 45k on all that training.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:40 am to prplhze2000
They should just have pitbulls on stand by. They'd frick up a school shooter.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:42 am to PrivatePublic
I saw a ridiculous Facebook meme the other day like any other day.
But it had a point. Have military vets do this. Is there a downside to this?
But it had a point. Have military vets do this. Is there a downside to this?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:42 am to prplhze2000
Locking doors has been a pretty damn effective strategy so far.
School shooters go for the path of least resistance and pass over locked doors.
Other than that, the prevention needs to come from not allowing them on the school grounds in the first place. Set up a stronger perimeter, more resource officers, and maybe metal detectors.
School shooters go for the path of least resistance and pass over locked doors.
Other than that, the prevention needs to come from not allowing them on the school grounds in the first place. Set up a stronger perimeter, more resource officers, and maybe metal detectors.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:43 am to prplhze2000
Implementing a plan like that certainly couldn’t hurt.
Also placing armed guards and allowing fully qualified and trained staff to conceal carry can’t hurt. Most of these school shooter will run or at least seek cover if they recieve any return fire!
Our schools are currently an open invitation to these tragedies.
Also placing armed guards and allowing fully qualified and trained staff to conceal carry can’t hurt. Most of these school shooter will run or at least seek cover if they recieve any return fire!
Our schools are currently an open invitation to these tragedies.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:48 am to Prominentwon
quote:
Is there a downside to this?
I think it would be easier to have police officers do this, the problem with hiring vets to be employees of the school would be their ongoing training to maintain their skills, schools just don't have the systems in place to keep them up with their training. That said, I think police departments stepping up the hiring of vets to be SRO's could be a fantastic idea.
Cost is also a major factor... for every school to have 2-3+ depending on school size (what you would need to be an effective response IMO) the costs would be astronomical.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:49 am to PrivatePublic
I didn't conveniently leave out anything. I could add that to my post and I would still call you out for being a dumbass for wanting to put firearms into the hands of teachers.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:50 am to dfintlyHmmrd
quote:
they still are 14-18 years old, theres not many of them who could quickly be trained in the scope of a active shooter drill to react effectively under the stress of the situation IMO.
I'd love to know how you came to this conclusion. And no one is expecting perfection. But any improvement is better than the current fish in a barrel situation.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:50 am to dfintlyHmmrd
quote:
So you think we can train kids paralyzed with fear and train them to just grab a stapler or something t and attack an active shooter probably armed with a AR-15 ?
Did you not even read the article??
Israel has found success with it already. It's not just a "pipe dream". It's been proven to work. Are our kids less capable than Israeli kids? (maybe we shouldn't answer that)...
Israel has solid data that it works.
I'll give you some other solid data. Making schools "gun free zones" is a complete failure. When your intent is to kill, do you think you give frickall about a sign saying you're not allowed to do so? It's typical liberal feelgood knee jerk solutions like this that keep us from discussing a real solution.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:51 am to prplhze2000
quote:
The point is to develop tactics that slow him down, buy time for the students. Cops can usually be there within 5-7 minutes once they get the call.
Hey, here's something that might slow him down. How about he not have 30 and 60RD mags. I mean the OP's article mentions reloading and clearing, so having to reload more often buys time too. If that saved one life would you write your NRA backed congressman and tell him/her how you feel.
FYI: I'm am a firm believer in the 2A
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:51 am to Prominentwon
quote:how much money would it cost to staff every public school in America with armed guards and is that worth "feeling safe"?
Have military vets do this. Is there a downside to this?
14 male students per 100,000 commit suicide every year but where is the outrage and the concern to spend time, money and other resources to address this?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:51 am to TygerTyger
quote:
I'll give you some other solid data. Making schools "gun free zones" is a complete failure.
Couldn't agree with that more.
But the article does not cite one instance where the students have stopped a shooting because they are trained to engage the shooter....
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 8:54 am
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:52 am to TygerTyger
quote:
Israel has found success with it already. It's not just a "pipe dream". It's been proven to work. Are our kids less capable than Israeli kids? (maybe we shouldn't answer that)...
I'm sorry if I don't want the US to be like Israel. I'd rather not sacrifice more freedom every year for the illusion of safety
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:52 am to prplhze2000
quote:
Teacher or district can pay for it.
Teachers are forced to buy a lot of their supplies themeselves, and you think a district is going to not only pay for the weapons but also pay for "real training" for all of these teachers? If not, do you think the Teachers that bitch about their pay and bitch about having to spend $200 or whatever on school supplies are going to pay for these weapons and for the "real training"?
get the frick out of here with this stupid shite
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:53 am to PCRammer
quote:
FYI: I'm am a firm believer in the 2A
quote:
How about he not have 30 and 60RD mags.
Huh?
You’re advocating taking things away from law abiding gun owners to prevent something that since columbine, has happened 31 times, 25 of which were fatal.
But you’re a firm believer in the 2nd amendment.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:53 am to Pilot Tiger
quote:
I'm sorry if I don't want the US to be like Israel. I'd rather not sacrifice more freedom every year for the illusion of safety
I agree but, what freedom is being sacrificed with this plan?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:57 am to TygerTyger
quote:I meant more about Israel in general and less about their specific school plans.
I agree but, what freedom is being sacrificed with this plan?
Have you ever flown into Israel or dealt with their checkpoints, etc?
It's a nightmare and living in that type of society would be hell
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 8:58 am
Posted on 2/16/18 at 8:57 am to rintintin
Training the students is basically a fruitless exercise. Training the teachers has more potential but only one or two simple acts. Anything more complex requires reasoning that is not going to function in such a stressful environment.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 9:02 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Locking doors has been a pretty damn effective strategy so far.
Until the shooter oulls the fire alarm and 1,200 kids run out into the hall.
quote:
School shooters go for the path of least resistance and pass over locked doors. Other than that, the prevention needs to come from not allowing them on the school grounds in the first place. Set up a stronger perimeter, more resource officers, and maybe metal detectors.
Metal detectors will only go off as the kids enter the building. Most schools have a lot of entry ways that must remain unlocked all day. Putting a detector at every door and a person manning it all day is not practical.
Shooter could also just wait in the woods until school lets out and shoots them as they exit. Or shoot up a football game. Or the buses as they drive away.
Bottom line is that there is we are looking at protecting kids from nuts that will find a way to kill. Our efforts would be better spent on dealing with the troubled kids. Better mental health and support programs.
Popular
Back to top



0





