- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There are more homebuyers over 70 than under 35
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:26 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:26 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:fify
ower your standard to be okay with the standard of previous generations, but live around minorities, live in a shite school district, and pay more for it
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:26 pm to Dirk Dawgler
quote:
If you want to start on the home ownership path, lower your standard to be okay with the standard of previous generations and get to moving up. Then you will be the one in a good position 20-40 years from now.
This! Also, need to eat rice and beans and quit any unnecessary spending. I see young people doing things all the time that I still can’t do in my early 50s. I bring my lunch into work just about everyday and most of my younger co-workers eat out. They also mostly drive newer and nicer cars than I have.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:26 pm to real turf fan
quote:
We had more un-spent money to put towards buying houses.
My oldest uncle was able to build a 3 BR 2 BA craftsman house for $8k and only $1 down in the late 1950s. That would be $91k and $12 respectively in today's $$$.
I don't think the problem is that younger generations don't have enough discretionary income because they overspend on modern conveniences/entertainment.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:27 pm to TigersHuskers
Hsven't read 6 pages so SIAP-
Radio guy on the road a few minutes ago in ATL said a good portion of that are boomers buying houses on behalf of their millennial kids who can't come up with the down payment or have credit/student loan issues.
Radio guy on the road a few minutes ago in ATL said a good portion of that are boomers buying houses on behalf of their millennial kids who can't come up with the down payment or have credit/student loan issues.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:28 pm to dat yat
quote:
Most milenials I know have a house with a sweet mortgage rate and most boomers I know have a paid off house. Those with low rates are not trading houses so they can keep that rate. Those with paid off houses trade do what they want, especially if downsizing.
This guy gets it.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:31 pm to aubiecat
Yeah oh no is right.
Old fricks are ruining everything.
I know it sucks, but you have to go now. It’s over.
Old fricks are ruining everything.
I know it sucks, but you have to go now. It’s over.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:33 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Just do what we did, and if you fail because we won’t give it to you in the same way it was given to us, well it’s your fault.
Horrible way of thinking, every generation or group of people will have different economic situations to deal with, adapt adjust survive, not surprised to hear it tho, everyone’s soft
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:36 pm to TigersHuskers
Gen Z less likely to get married and have kids, plant roots.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:39 pm to TigersHuskers
College kids are graduating and moving to big cities to rent one bedroom apartments, so they aren't interested in buying a home in the suburbs. The elder boomers have lived in the suburbs for 40 years, have money to buy whatever they want, and are probably downsizing their home a bit and going on European vacations.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:44 pm to AncientArousal
You forgot their Netflix, Starbucks, and ubereats
Posted on 8/15/25 at 2:53 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
You are a terrible written communicator.
Is that intentional so that you can continuously claim readers misinterpret your posts?
Is that intentional so that you can continuously claim readers misinterpret your posts?
Posted on 8/15/25 at 4:18 pm to TigersHuskers
We've owned 2 homes. We bought our 2nd(and current) home in 2016. We got it through a short-sale with my VA Loan for 109K when market value was 139K .
I'm glad we bought when we did before prices went full retard.
I'm glad we bought when we did before prices went full retard.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 4:34 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
It will inevitably swing back the other way. I mean eventually if people aren't buying houses, there will be a point where there is a huge boom in available hosues as people die. Now, does that fix the problem in any quick fashion? Absolutely not. I've already started to see homes here having some pretty big price decreases shortly after going on the market.
So Blackrock can swoop in and bid 20% over asking price to gather up an even bigger piece of the market and continue controlling rent prices? What really needs to happen is hedge firms and global businesses be banned from buying single family homes. Get corporations out of the landlording business when it comes to single family homes. If they want to build apartment buildings or condos then whatever. But they should not be hoarding single family homes by overbidding thus artificially driving the market to increase which further keeps normal people out of home ownership.
And Boomers: yall are fricking retarded sitting there with your head in your arse refusing to acknowledge it’s much, much harder for young people to buy homes or property than it was for you. The average home was 2x your yearly salary coming up. For young people today it’s anywhere from 6-10x the average yearly salary, or even more in many places. And their rents are so sky high that they can’t even begin to save for a downpayment. Yes, they waste too much money when it comes to discretionary spending but it truly doesn’t matter. Many will never be able to save enough money for a down payment whether if they buy that coffee or cancel Netflix or not. Speaking about $10 payments when we’re talking hundreds of thousands of dollars just shows how out of touch you are with the current situation
This post was edited on 8/15/25 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 8/15/25 at 4:42 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
Older are downsizing
No they are not. They are buying second and third houses because they are greedy fricking boomers.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 4:44 pm to N2cars
quote:
I dont belive you; cite it.
And that doesn't change the wealth transfer facts I cited.
Neither I nor the numbers lie
quote:
that more than 1 in 4 (27%) Americans age 59 or older have nothing saved for retirement. A similar 2024 study conducted by AARP found that 1 in 5 Americans age 50 and older have zero retirement savings.
Yet another 2024 study from the nonprofit Alliance for Lifetime Income (ALI) Retirement Income Institute shows that more than half (52.5%) of the “Peak 65” group of Baby Boomers who will turn 65 by 2030 have less than $250,000 in assets — including savings and real estate. Another 14.6% of this age demographic have $500,000 or less in assets, which is generally not considered enough to maintain most people’s standard of living.
BTW, what facts did you cite?
Posted on 8/15/25 at 5:28 pm to TigerintheNO
Fair enough. As I said, all boomers arent wealth, but many are.
And the wealth transfer is well-known.
ETA: Wiki
The Great Wealth Transfer refers to an intergenerational wealth transfer that is underway in the United States, among other nations, with the baby boomer generation leaving significant wealth to their heirs.[1][2] Baby boomers and the silent generation will bequeath a total of $84.4 trillion in assets through to 2045, with $72.6 trillion going directly to heirs.[1][3] The transfer of wealth from baby boomers will account for $53 trillion or 63% of all transfers, while the Silent Generation will hand down $15.8 trillion.[3]
And the wealth transfer is well-known.
ETA: Wiki
The Great Wealth Transfer refers to an intergenerational wealth transfer that is underway in the United States, among other nations, with the baby boomer generation leaving significant wealth to their heirs.[1][2] Baby boomers and the silent generation will bequeath a total of $84.4 trillion in assets through to 2045, with $72.6 trillion going directly to heirs.[1][3] The transfer of wealth from baby boomers will account for $53 trillion or 63% of all transfers, while the Silent Generation will hand down $15.8 trillion.[3]
This post was edited on 8/15/25 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 8/15/25 at 5:57 pm to TigersHuskers
So I ran the numbers on this a few years back accounting for time value of down payment+property taxes+insurance+repairs/maintenance/depreciation over 30 years, and as it turns out, renting actually does come out ahead in the long run
You don’t have the asset in the end, but the gains from the freed up capital in lieu of tax/insurance/down payment make up for it
You don’t have the asset in the end, but the gains from the freed up capital in lieu of tax/insurance/down payment make up for it
This post was edited on 8/15/25 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 8/15/25 at 6:03 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
They could stop showing up at planning meetings bitching about traffic.
Gives a new meaning to "raising Cain".
Posted on 8/15/25 at 6:12 pm to TigerintheNO
And, we've both made the same point:
You're saying they're too poor to be greedy, and I"m saying the wealthy ones are giving away their wealth.
You're saying they're too poor to be greedy, and I"m saying the wealthy ones are giving away their wealth.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 6:17 pm to Lawyered
quote:How many 70-80 year old Americans bought a house in 1960?
That house they bought for $20,000 in 1960 is now worth $800,000
Popular
Back to top



0








