- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:35 am to 777Tiger
quote:
seems risky, what would they gain from that?
at this point it certainly seems like that decision has even more to lose than it could possibly gain
that said... you have to remember...
the client is the GM and the lawyers are the coaches
if the GM is a Jerry Jones type... they can throw a bunch of shite at the coaches and say 'do this' and the coach has to try and make it work
Heard could be ordering the lawyers to do it and they have to try to do something with it
ETA: imagine Mickey Loomis telling Sean Payton to run the Wing-T in 2010... Heard would be Loomis & her attorneys are Payton/coaching staff
This post was edited on 5/18/22 at 10:44 am
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:40 am to rt3
Pennington's depo is done
another depo coming next
another depo coming next
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:42 am to rt3
I just saw ending of depo, but why can't defense cross on depos? Rekeita Law was saying if she was in court cross would be brutal and gave some examples of them destroying her story.
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:43 am to Pierre
quote:
Rekeita Law was saying if she was in court cross would be brutal and gave some examples of them destroying her story.
makes you wonder if that is the reason why Ambers witnesses aren't showing up for court.
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:44 am to Pierre
quote:
I just saw ending of depo, but why can't defense cross on depos? Rekeita Law was saying if she was in court cross would be brutal and gave some examples of them destroying her story.
Depp's lawyers asked Pennington questions 1st on the video depo
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:45 am to civiltiger07
so this witness is Pennington's ex-husband
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:45 am to rt3
quote:
so this witness is Pennington's ex-husband
yes
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:46 am to civiltiger07
quote:
makes you wonder if that is the reason why Ambers witnesses aren't showing up for court.
if you're asking it... it's very possible the jurors have these questions as well
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:46 am to rt3
quote:
Heard could be ordering the lawyers to do it and they have to try to do something with it
This is exactly what it looks like to me. It is the only thing that explains the defense trial strategy.
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:47 am to rt3
I stopped watching after Amber was done yesterday, was this girl's initial direct yesterday, then cross and redirect today?
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:49 am to Corso
quote:
I stopped watching after Amber was done yesterday, was this girl's initial direct yesterday, then cross and redirect today?
it's all been video depositions... so Depp's lawyers ask questions then Heard's lawyers ask questions and we move on
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:49 am to rt3
quote:
there are reports out there saying the Heard team very well may call Depp back to the stand...
which I feel would be a terrible mistake
I don't see how they can. They had a full opportunity to examine him already.
If they do call him, it would have to be on some topic not addressed in his direct examination.
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:50 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
I don't see how they can. They had a full opportunity to examine him already.
If they do call him, it would have to be on some topic not addressed in his direct examination.
Or to impeach his prior testimony??
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:52 am to JDPndahizzy
quote:
Or to impeach his prior testimony??
the BIG problem with that is Depp's lawyers can then come up on cross and ask him leading questions all day
and apparently that's a dream situation for a lawyer... getting carte blanche to lead your client on the stand
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:52 am to JDPndahizzy
quote:
Or to impeach his prior testimony??
That is what cross-examination is for.
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:53 am to rt3
quote:
the BIG problem with that is Depp's lawyers can then come up on cross and ask him leading questions all day
You can't lead your own witness, even if it is on "cross."
Posted on 5/18/22 at 10:54 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
You can't lead your own witness, even if it is on "cross."
interesting... Rekieta said they could
maybe it's civil vs. criminal?
or something in the Virginia Commonwealth rules that are unique?
This post was edited on 5/18/22 at 10:56 am
Posted on 5/18/22 at 11:02 am to rt3
Rekieta just picked up on why these are all video depos and not in person...
all the responses are "I was told..." and "I heard..." aka all hearsay which would be drawing furious objections from the plaintiff table
all the responses are "I was told..." and "I heard..." aka all hearsay which would be drawing furious objections from the plaintiff table
Posted on 5/18/22 at 11:19 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
You can't lead your own witness, even if it is on "cross."
You can if you are the Elon Musk of pit bull attorneys, and the other side, who is supposed to object, is a stunned bitch, who ate everybody's glue in elementary school.
Page 55 of 143
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News