- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: THC-laced edibles linked to early heart disease
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:42 pm to Dawgfanman
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:42 pm to Dawgfanman
Perfect
1
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:42 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
Breaking news: Breathing anything other than air into your lungs is bad
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:43 pm to SUB
quote:I know that but an "edible" is understood to be a THC product.
It just means that it's mixed with something else.
They should have said "THC Edibles" instead of saying a THC product is THC-laced when it's already know to be in there.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:44 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Perfect
Did you choose to be a cop? If you’d been shot in line of duty due to that choice, should you not get treatment?
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:44 pm to LSUA 75
quote:, willing to bet she smokes/smoked cigs.
I have a cousin that is a longtime frequent marijuana smoker,she has server COPD.
Not surprised ,breathing any kind of smoke over time will cause lung disease
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:48 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
I'd 100% say legalize it all as long as not one cent of taxpayers money goes to treatment or rehabilitation. Your body; your responsibility.
Without the enforcement/incarceration costs, there is plenty of money to pay for treatment for those that want it.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:48 pm to Dawgfanman
That's completely equivalent 
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:52 pm to Cosmo
quote:
You about to get downvoted
THC is harmless, only has good effects
quote:
Whether marijuana smoke would impact the human vascular system, however, was unknown.
Trust the science? Right?
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:54 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
That's completely equivalent
We are gonna need a pretty long list of choices people should and shouldn’t suffer the consequences of making.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:54 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
People are going to get very defensive about this.
Well let me know when they actually link THC to heart disease in humans.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:56 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
Study puts it just at the association stage for both smoking & eating edibles with THC. In one part they mention inflammation of a “layer of endothelial cells lines all of the body’s blood vessels” which effects release of nitric oxide to dilate for increased blood flow.
It’s not the first study to find a link with consistent use of marijuana and heart and vascular issues according to article.
quote:
“We found that vascular function was reduced by 42% in marijuana smokers and by 56% in THC-edible users compared to nonusers,” lead study author Dr. Leila Mohammadi, an assistant researcher in cardiology at the University of California, San Francisco, said in an email.
The research only shows an association, Springer said. “We can only state that the cannabis users have poor vascular function, not that cannabis use causes poor vascular function,” he said via email.
It’s not the first study to find a link with consistent use of marijuana and heart and vascular issues according to article.
quote:
Prior studies have found strong links between marijuana use and later cardiovascular disease. A February 2024 study found smoking, vaping or eating marijuana led to a significantly higher risk of heart attack and stroke, even if a person had no existing heart conditions and did not smoke or vape tobacco.
Stroke risk rose 42% and the risk of heart attack rose 25% if cannabis was used daily, and risk climbed as the number of days of use of marijuana rose, the study found.
… Using marijuana every day can raise a person’s risk of coronary artery disease by one-third compared with those who never partake, a February 2023 study found.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 3:00 pm to sidewalkside
quote:
I know that but an "edible" is understood to be a THC product.
They should have said "THC Edibles" instead of saying a THC product is THC-laced when it's already know to be in there.
Ah I see what you mean. I guess I was thinking that it read "THC laced gummies." But yeah, "edible" implies that there is THC in it already, like you said.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 3:02 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
Marijuana reminds me a lot of the covid shot how the government said it was safe and once millions of people used it only now we know how deadly it is
It seems like everyone who uses marijuana is also vaxed
Proud pureblood (both kinds) checking in
It seems like everyone who uses marijuana is also vaxed
Proud pureblood (both kinds) checking in
Posted on 5/28/25 at 3:04 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
THC has been long known to raise blood pressure and heart rate. Anyone with two brain cells should know automatically that high blood pressure is a leading contributor to heart disease.
THC products are much stronger milligram for milligram now compared to 20 years ago and it’s not even close. In states where it’s legal, you’ll be super lucky to even find any THC products that have CBD in them because almost all of them are at least 90% THC.
THC products are much stronger milligram for milligram now compared to 20 years ago and it’s not even close. In states where it’s legal, you’ll be super lucky to even find any THC products that have CBD in them because almost all of them are at least 90% THC.
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 5/28/25 at 3:09 pm to Snipe
quote:
I'll take a chance and say that filling the lungs with something other than a proper oxygen mix is going to have it's side effects.
Sure. But there's going to be variance of how strong the side effect is (or even what kind of side effects).
And if you're running sound research, you should be accounting for the variables because it affects the validity and reliability of the research. It needs to be retestable to duplicate result. The other variable I don't see accounted for is what they're considering "healthy"? Are they accounting for potential genetic occurrences that can contribute to potential underlying heart disease? With a small sample size are these potentially people from the same area with the same environmental exposures. And so on.
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 5/28/25 at 3:12 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
[img]“We’re looking at a window in the future, showing the early changes that may explain why smoking marijuana has been linked to later heart disease,” Springer said[/img]
From 69-83 I smoked half of Mexico and made Cheech and Chong look like the fricking Hardy Boys.
2022 Heart exploded and I’m now a member of the zipper club.
Could be me.
From 69-83 I smoked half of Mexico and made Cheech and Chong look like the fricking Hardy Boys.
2022 Heart exploded and I’m now a member of the zipper club.
Could be me.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 3:13 pm to BuckeyeWarrior
quote:
THC has been long known to raise blood pressure and heart rate. Anyone with two brain cells should know automatically that high blood pressure is a leading contributor to heart disease.
Cannabis lowers blood pressure in older adults
Posted on 5/28/25 at 3:21 pm to Dawgfanman
A sample size of 26 people isn’t enough to make a study clinically significant
Posted on 5/28/25 at 3:25 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
Proud pureblood (both kinds) checking in
I got vaccinated for the sake of keeping my job, not because I wanted to. Can I still be called a pure blood? Or am I on the fence?
Posted on 5/28/25 at 3:26 pm to low end
quote:
quote:
Findings In this cross-sectional study of 55 participants
Meh.
They paid people to get high. I was not consulted on this opportunity.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News