Started By
Message

re: Tell me why Imperial is better than the Metric system

Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:23 am to
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
123598 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:23 am to
Was waiting for that sketch. Brilliantly highlights the absurdity of it.
Posted by HarryBalzack
Member since Oct 2012
15987 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:26 am to
quote:

9mm
Which is a.357/.38, roughly, with a modern powder load, more or less.
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
8611 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:29 am to
You can't measure count hairs in metric
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 8:30 am
Posted by Antib551
Houma, LA
Member since Dec 2018
1260 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:29 am to
Good lord this thread reeks of low IQ. You know, the inferiority complex kind where one thinks they are the smartest in the crowd.

Y'all do realize that these "conversions" and their difficult feelings are relative to what you KNOW (i.e. imperial). Metric users have zero problem getting gnats arse accuracy. I would argue even more so than imperial users.

Base 2 imperial is quite possibly the dumbest form of measurement. Disregarding metric for a minute, base 10 imperial is far superior to base 2.

As a surveyor, I will argue that we should at minimum switch to base 10 imperial. Switching to metric is nearly economically/infrastructurally impossible at this point (though there are plenty of fields that already use it regularly). It would be relatively simple to switch to base 10 imperial.

Heck half of you in here are arguing how much better base 10 Fahrenheit is over Celsius and making this point for me. Its so much easier to measure and convert in base 10. Doesn't have to be Metric.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
52907 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:31 am to
Because 10mm sockets
Posted by Helo
Orlando
Member since Nov 2004
4663 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:31 am to
The reason why the US doesn't use metric is outlined in these responses, it is mostly rooted in American exceptionalism.

Now I believe in American exceptionalism but metric is simply better.

Everyone uses it every day in some form already, when is the last time you took .0007 oz of lipitor?

Metric nuts and bolts have been widely accepted for decades because of import cars.

In woodworking and metal fab, Imperial is maddening, especially if you have to be more accurate than 1/16.

When is the last time you bought a half-gallon of coke rather than a 2liter?

Back in the 70s, the move to start incorporating Metric was voluntary and it started being taught in school. However within 10 years that was abandoned, because of "cost" and "stubbornness".

Changing anything as substantial as weights and measurements takes time, decades or longer but had we continued down that path started in the 70s, we would be 50 years into that conversion. You cant switch over night but in long gradual steps would have made it possible.

Because of oil being sold mostly in barrels (imperial), it is unlikely to ever go away completely but if we switched to metric in measuring and weighting most ltems, I wouldn't complain except when setting my thermostat to 22.22C.
Posted by Joe_Dirte
The Boot
Member since Feb 2019
791 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:32 am to
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
12058 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:32 am to
quote:

1. Changing to metric would carry a huge cost under the surface. Think about all the engineering documents, road signs, mile markers that would need to be updated if we swapped over. Not to mention the speedometer in every single car.

2. You would have to change how everyone thinks about speed while you make those changes. Think about trying to tech the not-so-intelligent basic fractions again?

3. The imperial standard does have its practical and pragmatic benefits. The number 12 for example can be divided by 2, 3, 4, and 6 which has its advantages in construction. Fractions like these are typically easier to deal with on a tape measure than .3333 ect.


Im sold. Keep it imperial.
Posted by beerandt
Member since Jan 2020
317 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:38 am to
Ask the metric people why we don't use metric time, and see their attitude shift.

Then ask why metric units are based on (nominal) imperial seconds.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
75273 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:40 am to
depends on what you’re measuring

Saying a guy is 6 feet tall feels more intuitive than 1.8288 meters.

I definitely prefer Fagrenheit when talking about day to day temp. like the weather or an oven.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
29729 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:43 am to
I remember being in grammar school, back in the 70's, them telling us the Metric system is going to take over in the US within the next decade...

Never happened...
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
71062 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:45 am to
quote:

this thread reeks of low IQ


well, lucky for us we have smart folks like you to splain it to us.
Posted by MAXtheTIGER
Title town
Member since Dec 2006
1076 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:46 am to
I love telling girls that I have a 20 cm pecker and watch them smile when they figure it out
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 9:27 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281843 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:49 am to
Right. Our system is intuitive, more so than Celsius. There are certain areas where volume or distance could be better served with the metric system, but I like our temp nomenclature as it is more intuitive.

Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
92464 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Saying a guy is 6 feet tall feels more intuitive than 1.8288 meters.



Europeans almost always express height in CM (eg 6-foot is 183cm) and weight in kilograms (180 pounds is 82 kilo or 82kg).

quote:

I definitely prefer Fahrenheit when talking about day to day temp


I agree with that, but Celsius is insanely useful for scientific temp.
Posted by LSUtwolves
Member since Jun 2016
1069 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Because 36 inches is better than 39.3701


The argument would be 36 inches vs 100 centimeters, for a yard vs a meter.

I use the metric system daily in medicine and it’s much better for measurements in general. Much more precise and more intuitive.

There isn’t really argument for sticking with the imperial system aside from stubbornness.
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
14519 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:54 am to
I use metric when I'm building stuff. It's just easier.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
71062 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:56 am to
quote:

There isn’t really argument for sticking with the imperial system aside from stubbornness.


good enough for me.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
15988 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:56 am to
quote:

base 12 and your mind processes 12 better.

I think the Egyptians used base 12 math. Aliens probably taught it to them.
Posted by BHM
Member since Jun 2012
3569 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:57 am to
Because nobody wants a millimeter dick.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram