- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/6/19 at 11:32 pm to Deactived
I'd say 30-45 is the bulk. Finals threads only go like four pages now
Eta: I'm basing that off of the fact that everyone used to go to BBG at the same time as me, and the older frickers always talk about The Caterie, which was dying when I was first at LSU
Eta: I'm basing that off of the fact that everyone used to go to BBG at the same time as me, and the older frickers always talk about The Caterie, which was dying when I was first at LSU
This post was edited on 3/6/19 at 11:36 pm
Posted on 3/6/19 at 11:45 pm to OweO
God you are dense.
I’m saying he should set up more of these surveys in order to gather the data. Dumbass
I’m saying he should set up more of these surveys in order to gather the data. Dumbass
Posted on 3/6/19 at 11:45 pm to nctiger71
Just looked, I started in 2004... where did the damn time go
Posted on 3/6/19 at 11:49 pm to nctiger71
quote:
5% are ages 25 to 29
That seems really low
We are the majority over the old fat baws
Posted on 3/6/19 at 11:53 pm to Hammertime
quote:
Finals threads only go like four pages now
what ages are those people?
quote:
Eta: I'm basing that off of the fact that everyone used to go to BBG at the same time as me, and the older frickers always talk about The Caterie, which was dying when I was first at LSU
the ages of the people talking about said places matches the ages of the people that went there.
your age range lines up with mine pretty much
Posted on 3/6/19 at 11:54 pm to castorinho
quote:
people of a certain age bracket were more likely to respond to those two threads,
There was only one question. The other thread was from a few days ago when someone asked what everyone thought the age distribution of the posters on this board is.
I agree that there could be bias in that people of a certain age may be more likely to respond to the questions that was asked, but the data are not significantly skewed. For example, if the data showed 20% of the respondents were 65 or older than maybe there is an issue. No one 20 or younger responded to the question and I'm sure there are some on the board. There is probably some bias with that age group - but I doubt if it would significantly change the results.
Posted on 3/6/19 at 11:59 pm to nctiger71
I'm working on a robot that pulls post data from this site and plots the date/times of posts from individual posters to find out what times they post.
From this we can infer what times they work, sleep, etc.
From this we can infer what times they work, sleep, etc.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 12:11 am to nctiger71
Surprisingly a lot of old farts in here
Posted on 3/7/19 at 12:25 am to fr33manator
quote:They've got Google Analytics on here, he's already got this data and a lot more.
Might be valuable to chicken
Posted on 3/7/19 at 12:29 am to pioneerbasketball
quote:
i'm 20 fwiw.
quote:
pioneerbasketball
Aren't you the dude always posting those late night conspiracy/physics livestreams?
I figured you were at least 50.
on the subtle shitpostThis post was edited on 3/7/19 at 12:31 am
Posted on 3/7/19 at 3:36 am to OweO
quote:
by OweO
quote:And not even one tenth of that works.
Mine is 11.5"
Posted on 3/7/19 at 8:36 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
What was the question?
I put the answer in the OP.
This post was edited on 3/7/19 at 8:38 am
Posted on 3/7/19 at 8:57 am to nctiger71
Y’all old folk need to move aside for the young studs like me
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:09 am to nctiger71
Sorry I was just getting too technical.
With that said, I can't argue with your mode. In fact was my guess in another thread the other day.
With that said, I can't argue with your mode. In fact was my guess in another thread the other day.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:13 am to nctiger71
I'm 350 years old so I may have skewed the numbers.
Sorry, not sorry
Sorry, not sorry
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:13 am to nctiger71
I’ll admit I’m too dumb to understand this. I liked the picture chart but too many words and stuff.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:14 am to Upperdecker
quote:
Y’all old folk need to move aside for the young studs like me
we have to stay on here so there will be intelligent observations
Posted on 3/7/19 at 10:57 am to castorinho
quote:
people of a certain age bracket were more likely to respond
I think you're right in that older folks were probably more likely to answer the question. The 55 and 60 age groups are likely overstated a little and the 20, 25 and 30 are likely a little understated. But, how many < 25 are interested in this type of discussion board? My guess is not a lot.
FYI, the mode is 32, the mean is 42 and the median is 41, per EXCEL.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 11:06 am to nctiger71
We did this on the OB on this exact day in 2013, and it was 32
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News