re: Swedish Court refuses to deport migrant convicted of rape bc it didn’t last long enough

quote:

---

Given the nature and duration of the offense in question, the Court of Appeal finds that while the crime is serious, it does not constitute an exceptionally serious offense that would warrant a deportation order for Yazied Mohamed.

---

Well that's a fantastic precedent to set for future rapists. Let's see how that plays out for them.

You gotta love the argument of "while rape is serious, it's not really super serious" from your own government.

quote:

---

Bring back lynch mobs

---

It’s very clear that the true enemies are the courts and politicians that constantly allow this to happen over and over again while also demanding more of the savages be imported.

The EU has essentially declared all out war on Hungary for saying they’re not participating in this nonsense.

quote:

---

I feel like Europe has an incurable level of white guilt and cuckery. Call me an extremist, but I would argue that any duration of rape would be, let's just call it, serious.

---

Europeans constantly live under the cloud of WWII and the Holocaust. People see that racism lead to rounding up millions of people and exterminating them. The pendulum has swung, in many people’s minds, too far to the acceptance side of things in order to prevent that tragedy again.

quote:

---

The funny thing is its the white ultra lib women that everything they believe is the opposite of Islam that are leading the charge to this destruction

They will cry tears of joy when the burkas are being put on them

---

The OT Moderates can't wait for this day either. They want this exact same shite here.

If her parents loved her they would unalive that guy.

Have we had an above the fray moderate speak on this issue yet? I am sure there has to be a rebuttal on DU or Reddit.

quote:

---

Meya's dad should cruise on over to IKEA, find a nice table leg and rid the world of this piece of garbage.

---

As long as he can do it in under 10 minutes and identify as a refugee, he should be OK.

All that POS got was three years?!?

I'm pretty sure he's going to have a bad day when he's released if I'm the father.

I would make sure it would take less than 10 minutes too.

I mentioned this in the poli thread, but all these absurd immigration/deportations decisions come back more or less to the fiction that migrants and refugees in the EU or America are in large part actual refugees in need of asylum.

That's the ultimate false premise the whole house of cards sits on, as we've seen quite well here. Yes, plenty of people seeking asylum in the EU have legit claims. But most are just economic migrants. Same here.

But that fiction gives lawmakers the license to do stuff like this, ie, "we don't want to send these asylum seekers home to be slaughtered unless they've done the most egregious things imaginable!"

So violent military aged men are free to engage in pretty much any crime (including rape it seems) and be allowed to remain under this absurd pretense

Here's the chat gpt breakdown of the ruling.

quote:

---

Does sweden have some type of "rape must be 10 minutes in duration" law?

---

No — there is no law in Sweden that states rape must last “10 minutes” (or any specific duration) in order to be a crime.

Here’s a summary of relevant Swedish law:

-Since 1 July 2018, Sweden changed its law so that the basic criterion for what the law calls “rape” (in Swedish: våldtäkt) is lack of freely given participation in a sexual act, rather than just violence/threats.

- The relevant statute is in the Swedish Penal Code (Brottsbalken), Chapter 6.


-Sentences: For “ordinary rape” the range is 2 to 6 years imprisonment; for “gross/serious rape” it can go up to 10 years, especially if aggravating circumstances apply.


No provision in the law sets a minimum duration of the sexual act (like “10 minutes”) as a requirement for something to qualify as rape.

quote:

---

Why was the Meya Åberg assailant not deported then?

---

Here’s a breakdown of why the assailant in the Meya Åberg case was not deported under Swedish law — and the legal framework behind it.

What happened

An 18-year-old asylum-seeker from Eritrea, Yazied Mohamed, was convicted of raping the then-16-year-old Meya Åberg in Sweden in September 2024. He was sentenced to 3 years in prison and ordered to pay damages. The court declined to deport him after serving his sentence. The court’s reasoning included that the offence, while serious, did not meet the threshold of being “exceptionally serious” (or “particularly serious”) in the deportation context.


Legal framework in Sweden

Under the Swedish Aliens Act (2005:716) (Utlänningslagen) and related case law:

Section 8 of the Aliens Act says a foreign national can be expelled if convicted of an offence punishable by imprisonment, and either:

It can be assumed they will continue criminal activity in Sweden; or

The offence is so serious that they should not be allowed to remain.


For refugees (persons with “refugee status”) there’s an additional higher threshold: they may only be deported if they have committed an “exceptionally gross offence”

The court must also take into account the foreign national’s ties to Sweden: the length of stay, family, children, integration, etc.


Why the court decided not to deport in this specific case

From the reporting:

The court found that although the rape conviction was serious, it did not reach the level of an “exceptionally serious offence” required for deporting someone with refugee status.


The court specifically cited the “nature and duration” of the offence in its assessment: the attack was regarded (in the court’s view) as not enduring long enough to qualify as “exceptionally serious”.

The court also weighed factors such as the assailant’s status and presence in Sweden and the legal protections afforded to refugees.

Key takeaway

So, in short: this isn’t a case where “rapes must last 10 minutes” exists as a legal rule. Rather, the court applied the existing legal standard, which for deleting refugee status / deportation requires a very high threshold. Because the offence in the court’s view did not meet that exceptionally high threshold (in particular regarding its duration and perhaps other factors), they ruled against deportation under the refugee-protection provisions.

quote:

---

So in Sweden's opinion, rape is not an exceptionally serious offence?

---

That’s a completely understandable and important question — and the short answer is:

Sweden’s laws and courts do recognize rape as a very serious offence, but under Swedish law, “exceptionally serious” has a specific legal meaning that’s narrower than how most people would use the phrase in everyday language.

Here’s how that works:

?? 1. What Swedish law says

Rape (våldtäkt) is one of the most serious crimes in the Swedish Penal Code — punishable by 2–6 years in prison for ordinary rape and up to 10 years for gross (aggravated) rape.

Sweden also criminalizes negligent rape and sexual abuse, reflecting a consent-based model adopted in 2018.

So yes — in the criminal-law sense, rape is absolutely treated as a serious, violent crime.

?? 2. Why “exceptionally serious” is different

The phrase “exceptionally serious offence” (särskilt allvarligt brott) appears not in the Penal Code, but in the Aliens Act (Utlänningslagen), which governs deportation of non-citizens and refugees.

That phrase sets a very high threshold — it’s used only for crimes like terrorism, murder, aggravated violent offences, or repeated violent crimes.

Deporting a refugee requires proving the crime threatens public order or national security.

So when a court says a rape conviction was not “exceptionally serious”, it does not mean the court views rape as “not serious.”
It means the court didn’t find it reached the special, extra-high standard required to strip someone of refugee protection under international and Swedish law.

?? 3. Why this distinction exists

Sweden, like other countries bound by the UN Refugee Convention, cannot deport a refugee to a country where they risk persecution, unless they have committed an “exceptionally serious crime” and pose a danger to society.
That’s why Swedish judges must make this legal distinction — even if it seems morally frustrating.

?? 4. Public reaction

The decision in the Meya Åberg case has caused enormous backlash in Sweden, with politicians and the public criticizing the court for applying the law too narrowly.
There are already calls to reform the Aliens Act so that serious sexual crimes like rape would automatically meet the deportation threshold for non-citizens, even those with refugee status.