- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Suspect in LSU armed robbery is arrested
Posted on 1/30/19 at 10:36 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Posted on 1/30/19 at 10:36 pm to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
Jones is NOT affiliated with the university, officials say.
0
Posted on 1/30/19 at 11:12 pm to Byrdybyrd05
What position did he play?
Jokes.
Jes jokes...
Jokes.
Jes jokes...
Posted on 1/31/19 at 5:02 am to Slevin7
Well, how is he supposed to pay for the Jordan 5 Retro Tokyo T23's?
Posted on 1/31/19 at 5:58 am to fallguy_1978
quote:
Trudy will give him 6 months probation and require several LSU sororities to hire him as their house boy over the next five years so that they can understand his plight.
FIFY
Posted on 1/31/19 at 6:07 am to MMauler
Local New Orleans Fox 8 interviewed some real "winners" of LSU freshmen students on the matter....
Posted on 1/31/19 at 6:07 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Over/under on sentence is 1 year.
Over if they convict him for armed robbery. Mandatory 10-99 years.
Louisiana Law on Armed robbery
A. Armed robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another from the person of another or that is in the immediate control of another, by use of force or intimidation, while armed with a dangerous weapon.
B. Whoever commits the crime of armed robbery shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than ten years and for not more than ninety-nine years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
That needs to be on billboards. Maybe a few of these shitbirds would go in a different direction.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 6:34 am to soccerfüt
Nm
This post was edited on 1/31/19 at 11:39 am
Posted on 1/31/19 at 6:42 am to bperki6
I was impressed with your response but REALLY impressed with your long term restraint and lurkiness.
You post like a camel drinks.
I wish OweO & DavidTheGnome took after you.
You post like a camel drinks.
I wish OweO & DavidTheGnome took after you.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 6:51 am to soccerfüt
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/27/21 at 11:59 pm
Posted on 1/31/19 at 7:30 am to bperki6
You’re good man.
Our Almighty Chicken is after the clicks, not the clicks or the chicks.
Our Almighty Chicken is after the clicks, not the clicks or the chicks.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 7:36 am to Byrdybyrd05
He might have gotten away if the Mayor’s new Express CATS route had been in place.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 7:42 am to Twenty 49
quote:how will they prove armed robbery without video proof? Are there any eye witnesses?
Over if they convict him for armed robbery. Mandatory 10-99 years.
This post was edited on 1/31/19 at 7:46 am
Posted on 1/31/19 at 7:43 am to soccerfüt
Is he retarded?
Posted on 1/31/19 at 7:49 am to Chicken
quote:
hiw will they prove armed robbery without video proof? Are there any eye witnesses?
If the victim (eyewitness) identifies him and testifies as they reported the crime to police, that's all that's needed.
quote:
Jones reportedly had a handgun and demanded the victim’s wallet. Officials said after the victim handed over the wallet, Jones fled the scene and headed off campus.
WAFB
Posted on 1/31/19 at 7:55 am to Twenty 49
I meant 3rd party eyewitness. I guess I don't know how this works. If he denies he had a gun, could he get a lighter sentence?
Posted on 1/31/19 at 8:12 am to Chicken
Like any crime, the facts have to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. That proof often comes in the form of victim testimony. "The defendant put a gun in my face and demanded my wallet. He took it and ran." If the jury finds that testimony credible, that's enough.
The lack of a third-party witness does not mean he walks. Circumstantial evidence (such as using the vic's credit card soon afterward) is also admissible.
Despite what CSI may imply, the prosecutor does not have to present video or DNA to convict someone, or convictions before the modern era would have been scarce.
The lack of a third-party witness does not mean he walks. Circumstantial evidence (such as using the vic's credit card soon afterward) is also admissible.
Despite what CSI may imply, the prosecutor does not have to present video or DNA to convict someone, or convictions before the modern era would have been scarce.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 8:17 am to Chicken
quote:
If he denies he had a gun, could he get a lighter sentence?
If the jury did not believe the prosecutor proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant used a weapon, they could convict of simple robbery (same as armed, just without a weapon). Some call it strong-arm robbery. The potential sentence is much lighter.
§65. Simple robbery
A. Simple robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another from the person of another or that is in the immediate control of another, by use of force or intimidation, but not armed with a dangerous weapon.
B. Whoever commits the crime of simple robbery shall be fined not more than three thousand dollars, imprisoned with or without hard labor for not more than seven years, or both.
A sentence for simple, unlike for armed, could be suspended, and the defendant is potentially eligible for parole after serving a portion of the time.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 9:20 am to Chicken
Positive identification of the suspect in (6) person photograph line ups by multiple victims.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 10:03 am to fallguy_1978
quote:
Trudy will give him 6 months probation and make him work concessions for Aramark for a few home games next year.
You're giving her too much credit. that would be way too harsh.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 10:06 am to Twenty 49
quote:
Despite what CSI may imply, the prosecutor does not have to present video or DNA to convict someone, or convictions before the modern era would have been scarce.
This is actually becoming a problem IRL. Juries are expecting the standard of proof they see on TV.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News