Started By
Message

SURPRISE: Less pollution is leading to more hurricanes.

Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:39 pm
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
11197 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:39 pm
quote:

A new NOAA study published today in the journal Science Advances about four decades of tropical cyclones reveals the surprising result that reducing particulate air pollution in Europe and North America has contributed to an increase in the number of tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic basin

Meanwhile, it looks like China and India’s pollution is having a positive impact on Cyclones in the Pacific.
quote:

The study also found that the growth of particulate pollution in Asia has contributed to fewer tropical cyclones in the western North Pacific basin.


quote:

Over the last 40 years, Europe and North America have been leaders in reducing particulate air pollution from industry, autos, energy and other sources. The increasing absence of human-caused air pollution in the Northern Hemisphere, estimated to be a 50-percent drop in concentration from 1980 to 2020, has led to surface warming over the tropical Atlantic Ocean, which contributes to more frequent tropical cyclones. Without significant amounts of particulate pollution to reflect sunlight, the ocean absorbs more heat and warms faster. A warming Atlantic Ocean has been a key ingredient to a 33-percent increase in the number of tropical cyclones during this 40-year period, Murakami said.


NOAA
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 2:41 pm
Posted by MSTiger33
Member since Oct 2007
20383 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:40 pm to
So we need more cow farts to reduce our risk to hurricanes?
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19233 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:41 pm to


This is amazing
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30574 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:41 pm to
So saving the environment will destroy our coastlines anyway?
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54209 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:42 pm to
Chopping off our nose to spite our face.
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
14814 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:44 pm to
I, for one, did NOT see this coming
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
11197 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

So we need more cow farts to reduce our risk to hurricanes?

Cow farts release methane, a greenhouse gas. Almost all of the recent research has been blaming greenhouse gases for climate change, but this study adds another element into the equation.
Posted by trussthetruzz
Marquette, MI
Member since Sep 2020
9236 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:47 pm to
Sounds like no one knows shite from frick in regard to CC
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34884 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:47 pm to
I hate articles like these. Just tell me how many tax dollars are needed so we can increase our carbon footprint to sustainable levels.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53799 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:48 pm to
I’m going to equip my truck to “roll coal”. Next time a hurricane is approaching, I’ll just crank it up and make the storm dissipate. Y’all can thank me later.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:49 pm to
So... global warming increases hurricanes, and pollution reduces global warming? Is that what this is?
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 2:54 pm to
does this mean we can go back to the original diesel engines that blew black smoke and ran forever?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36031 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 3:02 pm to
I think better satellites add to the total number of tropical storms.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27305 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 3:03 pm to
Oh how rich is that lmao!
Posted by bad93ex
Member since Sep 2018
27190 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Sounds like no one knows shite from frick in regard to CC


Over 90% climatologist agree that they need more funding to figure it out
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35619 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 3:09 pm to
Makes sense.

Of course pollution is not good for human health, so not really a call to pollute more but an interesting consequence of less pollution.
Posted by TheGooner
Baton Rouwage
Member since Jul 2016
997 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 3:14 pm to
I've been reliably informed that the science is settled.

This seems as if the Science may not have been Settled.

Posted by GeauxJeaux78
Member since May 2020
741 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 3:19 pm to
Pollution decreased by 50%??

I find it very hard to believe the pollution has decreased over those 40 years when the world population INCREASED by 3.3 billion in that timeframe.
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 3:21 pm
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27305 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 3:31 pm to
I mean I guess the moral of the story is until countries like China and India reduce their pollution, we will keep getting screwed.

If humans are contributing to global warming, the entire planet needs to participate in reducing emissions. And we don’t even have a protective pollution cloud to show for it.
Posted by GetBackToWork
Member since Dec 2007
6258 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 3:33 pm to
Trust the Science?


No, trust that this will get buried.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram