re: Support mounting for Tarsha Clark-Amar (EBRCOA)

Gary showing his true colors once again, his outright refusal to even somewhat look at this with some amount of skepticism or logic shows who he's truly in it for, himself.

he's such a dishonest piece of shite

It wasn't obvious by his very first reaction to it?


"WHITE GUYS ARE CORRUPT TOO!!!!"

quote:

---

Has anyone mentioned the pink giraffe in the room? The fact that as trustee, she can write checks to whoever, disburse money however and have total control over the assets with 0 oversight?

---

Shhhhhhhhhh.............

quote:

---

Has anyone mentioned the pink giraffe in the room? The fact that as trustee, she can write checks to whoever, disburse money however and have total control over the assets with 0 oversight?

---

True. She has the power to make "investments" in order to "grow the trust". She could swindle the remaining funds without the trustees knowing about it.

quote:

---

In my opinion based on the facts I know, Clark-Amar has done more harm to herself by attempting to help Ms. Plummer carry out her wishes

---

this line blew my mind from gary

Help? By grossly over charging her for these services? Geez with friends like that...

the family may very well be shitty people, but that isn't relevant. There's no argument to be made that makes what TCA did appropriate though.

quote:

---

She could swindle the remaining funds without the trustees knowing about it.

---

I thought she was the trustee. If not, who is the trustee?

The people supporting COA and Clark are absolutely brain dead. Tasha Clark WOULD be the greatest beneficiary as the trust/will was written. And how stupid goes Gravy have to be to ask why the family removed funds from the account? The obvious answer is so the crook Clark doesn't loot the account. Doesn't take a freaking rocket scientist to figure that out. I mean, with the exception of the one guy posting below, these guys are fricking idiots. Jeesh


SJW - Sylvia Weatherspoon as a Christian woman watching this witch hunt against a fellow woman of God, please seek the real truth here. When Tasha took over the COA and they were in such a deficit that they couldn't pay employees, she and her husband took out a personal line of credit to pay her staff. Does this sound like a woman who would steal or be deceitful? It's a shame what WBRZ and these councilmen have done to this kind and generous woman.

Kyle Robert -- So what she has done in the past justifies her swindling TWICE what the great grandchildren will make from the estate? That doesn't seem to "help" those the will is intended to help, it seems to "help" her personally. AND, it is STILL a violation of the by-laws of her position.

SJW -- She didn't swindle anything.

Kyle Robert -- So you are ok with her getting $120k while the people that are supposed to benefit from this will get $60k each? Also being the fine, up-standing woman she is (sarcasm), shouldn't she have known it was a direct conflict of interests?

SJW -- Please cite your sources that show she took that money?

Kyle Robert -- If she was to get away with this, $500/month x 21 years x 12 months = $126,000. It's simple math really.

SJW -- She never planned to be paid from the estate so I don't see how that's relevant.

Chauna Banks -- I don't know the details, but I assume the 20 years is to take care of the estate until the great grandchildren come of age. That could include a lot of property mgt. and legal work. $500 a month is not a lot of money. I think the only issue here is I as COA Director probably would not have wanted that responsibility because of this kind of fallout. Hindsight is 20/20, but what the elderly lady did in her will is very common and the family members that will not benefit are always upset and cry foul. We just saw this with BBKing's estate.


Kyle Robert -- So the $500/month wasn't planned? What is it in the paperwork for then?

Chauna Banks -- I think it is part of what people do when there is a long term need to care for the estate.

Kyle Robert-- I'm not advocating for anyone but the great grandchildren to receive a dime of the estate but it's just an absorbent amount to take over the life of the trusts that makes her the largest beneficiary of the estate. It's ludicrous.

Chauna Banks -- I hear there are some houses involved. With all the blighted properties we have, I wish more people would do a will and assign an executor to either dispose of the property and/or keep it maintained. This is a lot of work for free. What is the going rate for this kind of deal?

Gary Chambers -- It doesn't make her the largest beneficiary. When the woman's properties are sold, there will be possibly $500k or more in the estate. The family is telling half truths because they understand how the story sounds when it is shaped that way.

Ask this question Kyle, why would the family remove the funds from the account without a judges permission. If they are correct in there legal standing the judge will change things.

I think Amar, intended to help carry out the woman's wishes. Planned to speak at private court and refuse the funds, which she has every right to do, but the family didn't even allow the matter to be opened in court. Probate court is where the will proceeds to be executed, at which stage the family had every right to challenge if they felt their loved ones affairs weren't handled accordingly.

What this really sounds like is some adults upset that Ms. Plummer excluded them and they want their piece of the pie.

If more facts come out that say otherwise we can readdress the issue at this point, but based on the facts I've read this is a disgruntled family upset that they aren't receiving any funds.

Had the will left all the money to the COA, or something of that nature I would be more understanding of the outrage, but she left her estate to her great grandchildren and asked someone she trusted to manage it.
Like · Reply · 2 · 4 hrs · Edited
Gary Chambers
Gary Chambers Currently a company called Appleseed is helping flood victims who live is property passed down through family, but they have no paperwork so they can't receive FEMA benefits. Appleseed has to go back and trace the family origin and help the people with...See More
Like · Reply · 2 · 4 hrs
John Williams
John Williams Gary Chambers Does she have a history of standing up in court and refusing funds?
Like · Reply · 3 hrs
Gary Chambers
Gary Chambers I doubt she has a history in court. Do you?
Like · Reply · 15 mins
John Williams
John Williams I ask, because if she had refused funds in court before, it would give credence to your thought that she would have refused these.

quote:

---

the family may very well be shitty people, but that isn't relevant. There's no argument to be made that makes what TCA did appropriate though.

---

Exactly, but that's not how that group thinks.

The lawyer who assisted this sham is teaching elderly law at Southern.

Which is more of a reason that execution should be an option given that they knew better.

Don't worry about that little bullet right there. I don't really plan on accepting the checks each month. I just didnt want to remove it from my template.