Started By
Message

re: Sub-Saharan African Civilizations

Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:35 pm to
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Not having navigable rovers leads to pockets of isolated communities, preventing the coalescing of peoples, distribution of labor, and the scale achievable through these two occurrences.

yep. there's a damn good reason the fertile crescent was where the earliest civilizations thrived
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149441 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

What made the desert stop where it does? Is there a river or something?
smoke more weed and you will figure it out
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27113 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Germs, Guns, and Steel is a pretty good book on it.


awful book

Do not waste your time with this nonsense
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
43068 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

awful book Do not waste your time with this nonsense


What’s awful about it?
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27113 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

What’s awful about it?


I'm not a believer in geographic determinism, which is what the book ultimately argues.

You can google plenty of criticisms of the book.

The entire thing feels like a gross oversimplification.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465730 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:03 pm to
I always take GST as an explanation on some impacts/variables of civilization and not an explanation of civilization itself.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465730 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

That the cheapest and most efficient way to move goods and people is over water. Over land takes incredibly long and is significantly less efficient than barges or cargo ships.

Not having navigable rovers leads to pockets of isolated communities, preventing the coalescing of peoples, distribution of labor, and the scale achievable through these two occurrences.


SoFla Tideroller in the absolute mud
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
148180 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
42056 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

This does not compute


There were empires and kingdoms in SSA, though stating this is usually met with ridicule for some reason.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
27578 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:24 pm to
Sub-Saharians is a good follow on Twitter
Posted by ItNeverRains
Offugeaux
Member since Oct 2007
28166 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:29 pm to
Mudhuts and Malaria, what’s not to like?
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
20834 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:31 pm to
Many people look at a culture and deem it a failure if it didn’t excel at what the viewer deems important. But we need to consider that the folks in that culture may have been perfectly content to live simply on their land and not build ships to venture out to trade with others, build large cities, etc.

For example, the Inuits could move to Toronto and work city jobs and have central heat, but most are fine living in simple homes and doing a lot of fishing and hunting.

It also reminds me of the parable of the Mexican fisherman.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8577 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:34 pm to
Do we count Ethiopia as Sub-Saharan Africa?

Because the civilizational history there is long and developed.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
133272 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:38 pm to
So what's your theory since you seem to think that one is crap?
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
43068 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:39 pm to
quote:


I'm not a believer in geographic determinism, which is what the book ultimately argues.

You can google plenty of criticisms of the book.

The entire thing feels like a gross oversimplification.


Interesting. I didn't take it that way but I did find some parts of it interesting about how certain animals and things survive better in the different conditions around certain parallels.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
62962 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:40 pm to
Songbo's Eredu was pretty impressive, less so however once you realize it was contemporary with medieval Europe.
Posted by AlterDWI
Pattern Noticing, Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
6029 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:52 pm to
Posted by oldtrucker
Marianna, Fl
Member since Apr 2013
3038 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:56 pm to
You'd think they'd have their share of black Magellans then.
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
60317 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

Or that it was 80 years ago meaning the youngest would be damn near 100 years old
Yep. Radiation poisoning is a slow killer.
Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
1155 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

quote:
What’s awful about it?


I'm not a believer in geographic determinism, which is what the book ultimately argues.

You can google plenty of criticisms of the book.

The entire thing feels like a gross oversimplification.


I've read it too. It's an incomplete view, IMO. I think it makes a great companion with Victor Davis Hanson's "Carnage and Culture", which focusses on how some cultures are simply better at technology and thus war than others. The two together are not quite the two sides of the same coin, but they are close and complimentary in many ways.
This post was edited on 11/22/24 at 4:25 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram