- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sub-Saharan African Civilizations
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:35 pm to Oilfieldbiology
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:35 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Not having navigable rovers leads to pockets of isolated communities, preventing the coalescing of peoples, distribution of labor, and the scale achievable through these two occurrences.
yep. there's a damn good reason the fertile crescent was where the earliest civilizations thrived
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:38 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:smoke more weed and you will figure it out
What made the desert stop where it does? Is there a river or something?
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:41 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Germs, Guns, and Steel is a pretty good book on it.
awful book
Do not waste your time with this nonsense
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:50 pm to skullhawk
quote:
awful book Do not waste your time with this nonsense
What’s awful about it?
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:00 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
What’s awful about it?
I'm not a believer in geographic determinism, which is what the book ultimately argues.
You can google plenty of criticisms of the book.
The entire thing feels like a gross oversimplification.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:03 pm to skullhawk
I always take GST as an explanation on some impacts/variables of civilization and not an explanation of civilization itself.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:04 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
That the cheapest and most efficient way to move goods and people is over water. Over land takes incredibly long and is significantly less efficient than barges or cargo ships.
Not having navigable rovers leads to pockets of isolated communities, preventing the coalescing of peoples, distribution of labor, and the scale achievable through these two occurrences.
SoFla Tideroller in the absolute mud
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:18 pm to StickyFingers
quote:
This does not compute
There were empires and kingdoms in SSA, though stating this is usually met with ridicule for some reason.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:24 pm to UFFan
Sub-Saharians is a good follow on Twitter
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:29 pm to UFFan
Mudhuts and Malaria, what’s not to like?
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:31 pm to LordSaintly
Many people look at a culture and deem it a failure if it didn’t excel at what the viewer deems important. But we need to consider that the folks in that culture may have been perfectly content to live simply on their land and not build ships to venture out to trade with others, build large cities, etc.
For example, the Inuits could move to Toronto and work city jobs and have central heat, but most are fine living in simple homes and doing a lot of fishing and hunting.
It also reminds me of the parable of the Mexican fisherman.
For example, the Inuits could move to Toronto and work city jobs and have central heat, but most are fine living in simple homes and doing a lot of fishing and hunting.
It also reminds me of the parable of the Mexican fisherman.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:34 pm to UFFan
Do we count Ethiopia as Sub-Saharan Africa?
Because the civilizational history there is long and developed.
Because the civilizational history there is long and developed.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:38 pm to skullhawk
So what's your theory since you seem to think that one is crap?
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:39 pm to skullhawk
quote:
I'm not a believer in geographic determinism, which is what the book ultimately argues.
You can google plenty of criticisms of the book.
The entire thing feels like a gross oversimplification.
Interesting. I didn't take it that way but I did find some parts of it interesting about how certain animals and things survive better in the different conditions around certain parallels.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:40 pm to UFFan
Songbo's Eredu was pretty impressive, less so however once you realize it was contemporary with medieval Europe.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:56 pm to SoFla Tideroller
You'd think they'd have their share of black Magellans then.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 4:00 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:Yep. Radiation poisoning is a slow killer.
Or that it was 80 years ago meaning the youngest would be damn near 100 years old
Posted on 11/22/24 at 4:24 pm to skullhawk
quote:
quote:
What’s awful about it?
I'm not a believer in geographic determinism, which is what the book ultimately argues.
You can google plenty of criticisms of the book.
The entire thing feels like a gross oversimplification.
I've read it too. It's an incomplete view, IMO. I think it makes a great companion with Victor Davis Hanson's "Carnage and Culture", which focusses on how some cultures are simply better at technology and thus war than others. The two together are not quite the two sides of the same coin, but they are close and complimentary in many ways.
This post was edited on 11/22/24 at 4:25 pm
Popular
Back to top


0











