- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study: MRNA Vaccines Increase Risk of Contracting COVID-19; Each Booster Shot Raises Risk
Posted on 12/30/22 at 9:53 am to lsupride87
Posted on 12/30/22 at 9:53 am to lsupride87
quote:
So, if presented with studies from Cleveland clinic that showed positivity towards the vaccine, how would you react?
How current are they?
I think there was a time that COVID vaccines had clear benefits for certain populations
1
Posted on 12/30/22 at 9:56 am to lsupride87
quote:
You are an MD that has locked in on this one study and ignored countless others willfully.
Wrong. I read the study critically and couldn’t find any glaring errors. I asked what was wrong with the study and haven’t gotten a single answer. So I suspect they just don’t like the results.
If someone will tell me what is wrong with the study I will reconsider my position. I’m not afraid to say I was wrong unlike alot of people in this thread.
This post was edited on 12/30/22 at 9:57 am
Posted on 12/30/22 at 9:57 am to stout
Was this entirely about money?
A false sense of security?
What was the play?
This is potentially the greatest farce in our nation’s history.
A false sense of security?
What was the play?
This is potentially the greatest farce in our nation’s history.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 9:57 am to WaWaWeeWa
Posted on 12/30/22 at 9:59 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:Hopeful Doc respectfully answered you multiple times and you ignored him
Wrong. I read the study critically and couldn’t find any glaring errors. I asked what was wrong with the study and haven’t gotten a single answer.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 9:59 am to lsupride87
You just posted a study about the effectiveness of vaccines in IMMUNOCOMPROMISED patients.
Are you fricking serious?
quote:
Hopeful Doc respectfully answered you multiple times and you ignored him
I’ll go back and look. When I was active in this thread no one would answer.
This post was edited on 12/30/22 at 10:00 am
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:00 am to S
quote:
I love watching plant baws argue about this shite with actual doctors
Dude imagine if the roles were reversed, I would feel dumb as shite
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:01 am to WaWaWeeWa
If the study showed that having the vaccine minimally raised your risk of getting Covid, yet provided you moderate protection from Covid, isn’t that an overall positive?
Though I do agree that the “vaccines” were marketed to prevent transmission. So the study does show that they do a poor job of that. But we already knew that.
I guess I just don’t understand why this study is being discussed on here as some big gotcha
Though I do agree that the “vaccines” were marketed to prevent transmission. So the study does show that they do a poor job of that. But we already knew that.
I guess I just don’t understand why this study is being discussed on here as some big gotcha
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:02 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Do we know that other common cold coronaviruses don’t replicate in other tissues?
All coronaviruses have spike proteins on their surface that specifically attach itself to the host's ACE2 receptor.
ACE2 receptors are all over our respiratory tract, but other tissues like blood vessels and the GI tract can also have these receptors.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:02 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:Umm, if it successfully reduced hospitalizations and mortality in the sickest of our population, then clearly the vaccine is reducing mortality
You just posted a study about the effectiveness of vaccines in IMMUNOCOMPROMISED patients. Are you fricking serious?
How can you claim to be an MD and laugh at that?
Myself nor the other doctors in here are saying healthy young people have a material reduction in risk with the vaccine, but it absoutely through studies have shown it reduces hospitalizations and mortality at large. If you deny that you are choosing to search through the bulk of data and studies to latch on to the minority
This post was edited on 12/30/22 at 10:06 am
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:03 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
If the study showed that having the vaccine minimally raised your risk of getting Covid, yet provided you moderate protection from Covid, isn’t that an overall positive?
It didn’t show that.
We are currently recommending this vaccine to 6 month olds.
No healthy child has ever died from this virus. So I am assuming we are recommending this vaccine to “stop the spread” even though it has been proven to cause myocarditis in young adults. So if a study comes out that says it makes you more likely to get COVID, I have to explain to you why that is important?
This post was edited on 12/30/22 at 10:07 am
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:06 am to stout
You get your "facts" from the Gateway Pundit? LOL
Wikipedia:
The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[2] fake news website.[1] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[33
It's scary how many people get their "facts" from online "news" sites these days. This is like people in the 80's getting their news from the National Enquirer.
You have been brainwashed to think actually news organizations are fake while believing actual fake news sites. It's amazing how dumb social media has made people
Wikipedia:
The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[2] fake news website.[1] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[33
It's scary how many people get their "facts" from online "news" sites these days. This is like people in the 80's getting their news from the National Enquirer.
You have been brainwashed to think actually news organizations are fake while believing actual fake news sites. It's amazing how dumb social media has made people
This post was edited on 12/30/22 at 10:10 am
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:06 am to S
quote:
+1,000,000 for believing in Q
Lulz never posted a fricking thing about Q on this board or any other, hyper low IQ retort. Standard simp cuck NPC response
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:07 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
I guess I just don’t understand why this study is being discussed on here as some big gotcha
Every post by stout comes across as a gotcha that never is once you actually look at the study (or how it was manipulated by a source like GP with a clear agenda). I wish we could banish his threads to a separate board for vaccine obsessed people because his posts are all carbon copies of one another.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:07 am to YNWA
quote:
You get your "facts" from the Gateway Pundit? LOL
Just click on the link directly to the study moron. The gateway pundit wouldn’t have to report on it if the media actually did its job rather than be completely captured by one political party.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:08 am to YNWA
quote:
Wikipedia:
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:09 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
shows that MRNA vaccines raise the risk of contracting COVID-19 and that each MRNA vaccine booster increases the risk of contracting COVID-19, while those who have not received any MRNA vaccine have the lowest risk of contracting COVID-19. While the increased risk was relatively minimal
quote:
Conclusions The bivalent COVID-19 vaccine given to working-aged adults afforded modest protection overall against COVID-19, while the virus strains dominant in the community were those represented in the vaccine.
Honest question. Can you explain to me what I am missing?
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:09 am to cwil177
quote:
banish his threads to a separate board
Sounds facist
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:10 am to Nado Jenkins83
Muh wikipedia say its a white supremacist website
Ultimate clown world
Ultimate clown world
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:10 am to YNWA
quote:No, the facts came from the Cleveland Clinic.
You get your "facts" from the Gateway Pundit? LOL
quote:Gateway Pundit simply reported it, because the Joseph Goebbels Conglomerate known as the MSM won't touch it.
The study was conducted this fall of 51,011 Cleveland Clinic workers to see how effective the new bivalent MRNA vaccine was in preventing infections.
You are most definitely a "muh CNN said" type.
Page 16 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News