Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 19
Started By
Message

Study: MRNA Vaccines Increase Risk of Contracting COVID-19; Each Booster Shot Raises Risk

Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:12 pm
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167336 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:12 pm
Before the usual suspects attack me I just copied and pasted the headline and I am just reposting the article. Read it for yourself and draw your own conclusions


quote:

A stunning pre-print study by the Cleveland Clinic published Monday at medRxiv shows that MRNA vaccines raise the risk of contracting COVID-19 and that each MRNA vaccine booster increases the risk of contracting COVID-19, while those who have not received any MRNA vaccine have the lowest risk of contracting COVID-19. While the increased risk was relatively minimal, the result is the opposite of how the vaccines have been sold and mandated by government authorities. The highest risk was for those who received more than three vaccines.

The study was reported by the Cleveland Clinic’s Nabin K. Shrestha, Patrick C. Burke, Amy S. Nowacki, James F. Simon and Amanda Hagen, Steven M. Gordon.

Quote from the study: “The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected.”

The study was conducted this fall of 51,011 Cleveland Clinic workers to see how effective the new bivalent MRNA vaccine was in preventing infections. Only 21 percent of workers received the bivalent booster which was seen to only have a 30 percent effectiveness. Overall, five percent of all workers in the study contracted COVID during the 13-week study period.


quote:

This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice

ABSTRACT
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine protects against COVID-19.

Methods Employees of Cleveland Clinic in employment on the day the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine first became available to employees, were included. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was examined over the following weeks. Protection provided by vaccination (analyzed as a time-dependent covariate) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. The analysis was adjusted for the pandemic phase when the last prior COVID-19 episode occurred, and the number of prior vaccine doses received.

Results Among 51011 employees, 20689 (41%) had had a previous documented episode of COVID-19, and 42064 (83%) had received at least two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. COVID-19 occurred in 2452 (5%) during the study. Risk of COVID-19 increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received. In multivariable analysis, the bivalent vaccinated state was independently associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, .70; 95% C.I., .61-.80), leading to an estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 30% (95% CI, 20-39%). Compared to last exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 90 days, last exposure 6-9 months previously was associated with twice the risk of COVID-19, and last exposure 9-12 months previously with 3.5 times the risk.

Conclusions The bivalent COVID-19 vaccine given to working-aged adults afforded modest protection overall against COVID-19, while the virus strains dominant in the community were those represented in the vaccine.

Summary Among 51011 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine booster was 30% effective in preventing infection, during the time when the virus strains dominant in the community were represented in the vaccine.


LINK



quote:

The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19





quote:

The multivariable analyses also found that, the more recent the last prior COVID-19 episode was the lower the risk of COVID-19, and that the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19




LINK
This post was edited on 12/28/22 at 6:14 pm
Posted by Play_Neck
Member since Dec 2014
1872 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:14 pm to
wow
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
72976 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:15 pm to
What a shitshow.
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37343 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:15 pm to
Stunning
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
6202 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:16 pm to
Have seen this in my workgroup.
Only about 70 ppl.

But, "vaccinated" are out sick more often than no shot people.

"Vaccinated" are overrepresented in those out with Rona.

This post was edited on 12/29/22 at 8:38 am
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
15332 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:18 pm to
What a bunch of idiots who lined up for the jab.
Posted by TwoFace
Member since Mar 2018
1114 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

But, "vaccinated" are out more often than no shot people


So, you think the unvaccinated are staying home because of covid risks?! frick no, they are just living a normal life, and not getting sick.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99094 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Summary Among 51011 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine booster was 30% effective in preventing infection, during the time when the virus strains dominant in the community were represented in the vaccine.


So the new booster is the most effective? Or at least that's how the study reads.

Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21057 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:23 pm to
Wait till you see how many people were in the original clinical trials for the vax
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
10518 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:23 pm to
Just on the side note, I do find it amusing that you discredit all the studies that don’t agree with your opinion, and then post the studies that do agree with your opinion.
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12805 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:25 pm to
I got vaccinated early on because what was being published made it seem like the right thing to do. After the booster, I was done. When I’m constantly being told I need a third, fourth, etc booster I sense I’m being fed complete BS. I’ve also had Covid twice. It sucked, but nothing to be scared of—some chills and lethargy.
Posted by Chef Curry
Member since Mar 2019
2063 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Just on the side note, I do find it amusing that you discredit all the studies that don’t agree with your opinion, and then post the studies that do agree with your opinion


I’m sure you cheered on the “studies” that said Covid = automatic death.
Posted by LSU Tigerhead
Metairie
Member since Nov 2007
4961 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Just on the side note, I do find it amusing that you discredit all the studies that don’t agree with your opinion, and then post the studies that do agree with your opinion.
It's far easier to fool a fool than it it so convince him that he has been fooled. --Mark Twain
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166339 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

A stunning


I disagree with the word stunning.
Posted by G The Tiger Fan
Member since Apr 2015
103814 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:35 pm to
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
10518 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:37 pm to
I haven’t championed any study. I also haven’t started Covid threads with a clear one sided opinion for the last 3 years like OP has.

And I’m not saying OP is right or wrong. I’m just saying it’s amusing to watch OP come on here saying “Look at the studies” after years of saying the science is fake news.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39509 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:38 pm to
Crazy4lsu will be here shortly to call the Cleveland Clinic a bunch of slack-jawed quacks who don’t know anything about medicine.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71482 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

So the new booster is the most effective? Or at least that's how the study reads.


Did any of these get FDA approval?
Posted by lsuguy84
CO
Member since Feb 2009
19721 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:39 pm to
Yeah but he is a complete mongoloid
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9333 posts
Posted on 12/28/22 at 6:40 pm to
Guys who look like this are furiously downvoting.


Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram