- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study: MRNA Vaccines Increase Risk of Contracting COVID-19; Each Booster Shot Raises Risk
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:11 am to lsupride87
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:11 am to lsupride87
quote:
Umm, if it successfully reduced hospitalizations and mortality in the sickest of our population, then clearly the vaccine is reducing mortality How can you claim to be an MD and laugh at that?
You need to check yourself.
I clearly said it has benefits in certain populations.
My beef is that this vaccine is currently being recommended for healthy 6 month olds and brain dead democrat lemmings are blindly injecting their healthy kids because of “the science”. The study completely contradicts the logic in that recommendation.
I bet none of the doctors in this thread have vaccinated their healthy kids. Why?
3
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:12 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
No healthy child has ever died from this virus
You’re a doctor and you’ve never heard of MIS-C? Now I’m skeptical.
We had a kid with that come through our shop last month. Multi organ failure. Survived after coding and spending time on ECMO but is basically a vegetable. At that point I would rather be dead tbh.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:12 am to TValley
I wonder if poster was suggesting Gateway Pundit fabricated the study?
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:12 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
Honest question. Can you explain to me what I am missing?
You are missing reading the actual study not just the conclusions. That’s why I like this study so much. The authors clearly didn’t want this result and try to minimize it as much as possible in the summary. The actual results show what they found. Go read the results section.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:13 am to cwil177
quote:
We had a kid with that come through our shop
A medical shop? You running a doctors office out a metal shed or something?
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:13 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
My beef is that this vaccine is currently being recommended for healthy 6 month olds
A parent would be retarded to act on that.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:14 am to cwil177
quote:
You’re a doctor and you’ve never heard of MIS-C? Now I’m skeptical.
Yea I have. What is the rate in healthy children? (At the current state of the pandemic where probably north of 90% of kids have already had COVID and we are dealing with omicron)
Hint: it’s a minuscule number. Likely zero.
quote:
We had a kid with that come through our shop last month. Multi organ failure.
A completely healthy kid prior to COVID infection?
This post was edited on 12/30/22 at 10:16 am
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:14 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:Were you this adamant for the last 30 years for the same recommendations being used for flu vaccine?
My beef is that this vaccine is currently being recommended for healthy 6 month olds and brain dead democrat lemmings are blindly injecting their healthy kids because of “the science”. The study completely contradicts the logic in that recommendation.
Because it’s “benefits” for that healthy 6 month old is the same
The medical community has always advocated for vaccines that have minimal benefit or the young healthy population in order to reduce overall risk. Acting like it’s new or evil now is to ignore all medical science
This post was edited on 12/30/22 at 10:16 am
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:16 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Just click on the link directly to the study moron. The gateway pundit wouldn’t have to report on it if the media actually did its job rather than be completely captured by one political party.
There is a reason why the media (and medical journals) don’t release non-peer reviewed preprints (many of them are pseudoscientific garbage or poorly designed studies with bogus data). The media is predominantly leftist but JFC your argument is terrible.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:17 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Just click on the link directly to the study moron. The gateway pundit wouldn’t have to report on it if the media actually did its job rather than be completely captured by one political party.
Oh, the link for this site?LOL
medRxiv (pronounced "med-archive") is an Internet site distributing unpublished eprints about health sciences.[1][2][3][4] It distributes complete but unpublished manuscripts in the areas of medicine, clinical research, and related health sciences without charge to the reader. Such manuscripts have yet to undergo peer review and the site notes that preliminary status and that the manuscripts should not be considered for clinical application, nor relied upon for news reporting as established information.[5]
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:17 am to lsupride87
quote:
Were you this adamant for the last 30 years for the same recommendations being used for flu vaccine? Because it’s “benefits” for that healthy 6 month old is the same
Show me the study that says a healthy 6 month old who already had COVID is more at risk from COVID rather than the flu. Currently with omicron variants.
Flu is waaaay more deadly. RSV too.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:18 am to cwil177
quote:
There is a reason why the media (and medical journals) don’t release non-peer reviewed preprints (many of them are pseudoscientific garbage or poorly designed studies with bogus data).
Are you claiming the data in this study is fabricated?
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:19 am to cwil177
quote:
There is a reason why the media (and medical journals) don’t release non-peer reviewed preprints (many of them are pseudoscientific garbage or poorly designed studies with bogus data). The media is predominantly leftist but JFC your argument is terrible.
bullshite. They would release a non peer reviewed study in a heart beat if it showed what they wanted it to. You can’t honestly believe that.
Why is this a poorly designed study?
Why is the data bad?
I’ve authored articles and peer reviewed them. I’m sure you have too.
Let’s do it right now.
This post was edited on 12/30/22 at 10:20 am
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:21 am to stout
quote:
Gateway Pundit
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:21 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
I clearly said it has benefits in certain populations.
Yep, the intelligent process would have been to protect and isolate at risk people.
But the Covidians who can't think for themselves just offered blanket policy then screamed at the sky when you balked.
Now those frickers are asking you to forgive them for their stupidity.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:21 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
A completely healthy kid prior to COVID infection?
Yes. Your supposition that no healthy children have died from Covid is a weird hill to die on. MIS-C doesn’t just happen in kids with comorbidities. I’ll agree with you that I would be conflicted on vaxxing my kid or not (would defer to their pediatrician) because I’m not sure the risk outweighs the benefits given that Covid is milder in kids compared to adults.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:22 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:You are talking in all kinds of circles now man
Show me the study that says a healthy 6 month old who already had COVID is more at risk from COVID rather than the flu. Currently with omicron variants.
Just how” deadly” is the flu truly to young healthy people? Why as an MD have you sat idly by these last few decades as your medical community urged those young healthy people to get flu shots?
This post was edited on 12/30/22 at 10:22 am
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:23 am to stout
Not surprised, our local Covid data dashboard by the numbers has long shown that the more you are vaxxed the more likely you are to get Covid. A radio show host here that's big on crunching things has been trying for months to get them to answer why this is and why state workers are still required to be vaccinated.
No reply.
No reply.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:25 am to cwil177
quote:
Your supposition that no healthy children have died from Covid is a weird hill to die on.
I asked you how many. My own belief is that it’s in the single digits or possibly zero. Way less than swimming pools every year. But you can give your opinion.
quote:
I’ll agree with you that I would be conflicted on vaxxing my kid or not (would defer to their pediatrician) because I’m not sure the risk outweighs the benefits given that Covid is milder in kids compared to adults.
I do appreciate your honesty.
Posted on 12/30/22 at 10:27 am to cattus
And where the frick was strannix and stout in 2010?
My teammate, and additionally a woman on the lsu womens basketball team got guillain barre shortly after our forced flu vaccines we took as athletes
Where the frick were you strannix? Where were you stout? Wawweewawee where were your s the MD to stop these healthy athletes from taking the unneeded vaccine?
My teammate, and additionally a woman on the lsu womens basketball team got guillain barre shortly after our forced flu vaccines we took as athletes
Where the frick were you strannix? Where were you stout? Wawweewawee where were your s the MD to stop these healthy athletes from taking the unneeded vaccine?
Page 17 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News