- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/17/26 at 7:52 am to yakster
Go to rtings.com for a list of unbiased sound bar and TV reviews. They purchase everything they review. No manufacturers are allowed to send products for review. The reviews are extensive and data-based from testing using existing test systems, not subjective "it sounded great!" type of consumer reviews.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:00 am to yakster
I went to Sonos after my Bose sub died. Changed completely to Sonos after just switching out the sub. I have the sound bar, sub, and 4 satellites. Sonys sounds better to me. The ease of playing music via Bluetooth through Sonus is amazingly easy.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:59 am to go_tigres
I'm an audiophile so my system is on the expensive side, but not as expensive as some audiophiles I know. At some point you reach the point of diminishing returns.
I have Klipsch Reference towers with Klipsch Reference book-shelfs, a Klipsch center channel, and an SVS 12" sub. My surround receiver is a Yamaha Aventage.
I mainly just run in stereo mode because I listen to music more than I watch movies. I also run mine hard wired because bluetooth doesn't transmit HD audio. Bluetooth has a limit of about 256kb/s bitrate, while HD audio is 1444kb/s. 256kb/s is fine for movies because that's enough for the human vocal range to be transmitted pretty clearly. The higher bitrate is for the little details in music and sound effects that you'd miss with bluetooth. It's very noticable.
The SVS sub I have can hit below 20Hz, which is below human hearing, but you can feel it.
I'll admit that it doesn't have as clean of a look as wireless, I can run it through wifi to get HD audio to avoid BT, but I'm pretty old school and just prefer wiring. I can deal with a slightly unclean look.
I have Klipsch Reference towers with Klipsch Reference book-shelfs, a Klipsch center channel, and an SVS 12" sub. My surround receiver is a Yamaha Aventage.
I mainly just run in stereo mode because I listen to music more than I watch movies. I also run mine hard wired because bluetooth doesn't transmit HD audio. Bluetooth has a limit of about 256kb/s bitrate, while HD audio is 1444kb/s. 256kb/s is fine for movies because that's enough for the human vocal range to be transmitted pretty clearly. The higher bitrate is for the little details in music and sound effects that you'd miss with bluetooth. It's very noticable.
The SVS sub I have can hit below 20Hz, which is below human hearing, but you can feel it.
I'll admit that it doesn't have as clean of a look as wireless, I can run it through wifi to get HD audio to avoid BT, but I'm pretty old school and just prefer wiring. I can deal with a slightly unclean look.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:03 am to yakster
You ever see tits on a bull? That is equivalent to a soundbar. Unless you get one with a sub woofer or something.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:03 am to yakster
quote:
Is Bose better than Sonos or are they about the same?
I have both and i prefer the Sonos.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:03 am to OweO
You obviously have only purchases a <$100 soundbar then 
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:09 am to yakster
I bought the cheapest, smallest LG soundbar with a sub that I could find. And it gets way louder than I will ever need. Huge upgrade from stock tv speakers. I chose LG because that's the tv brand so the connection and integration was optimal and I don't need a separate remote to operate it, etc. So that's my recommendation. Get a brand that matched your tv.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:25 am to Roy Curado
quote:
You obviously have only purchases a <$100 soundbar then
Let's be honest, soundbars are inherently flawed by design. Whether a result of space, budget, SAF, or ease of connection, many people choose them. Physics is on a multi-billion-year run of being undefeated, and it isn't starting just because someone wants an excellent soundbar. It is like the tiny to small subwoofers they often come with, which are really MBM (mid-bass modules), try as they might, they can't defy Hofmann's Iron Law.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:35 am to SuperSaint
I have Bose throughout my home and at work for 11 years and had one upgrade.
I’m pleased.
I’m pleased.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:50 am to yakster
I replaced an old surround system in the living room with SONOS Playbase, sub, and Play1 surrounds 10 years ago. They sound great, get very loud, and easy to setup but most of thier stuff doesn't have bluetooth which is frustrating for how expensive it was. I now have the SONOS for TV only and Bose Revolve speakers throughout the house for music. This setup is very versatile and easy but total cost was north of $4k.
I also have Polk React surround system setup in the master bedroom. The sound is great, it is wireless and has bluetooth, and was less than 1/3 cost of the SONOS. Polk no longer manufactures this but replaced with MagniFi which looks and costs similar. If I had to start over I'd go this route, maybe some extra bluetooth speakers for the pool and patio, and save a ton of money.
I would at least add a sub for the soundbar or you'll likely be disappointed with the upgrade.
I also have Polk React surround system setup in the master bedroom. The sound is great, it is wireless and has bluetooth, and was less than 1/3 cost of the SONOS. Polk no longer manufactures this but replaced with MagniFi which looks and costs similar. If I had to start over I'd go this route, maybe some extra bluetooth speakers for the pool and patio, and save a ton of money.
I would at least add a sub for the soundbar or you'll likely be disappointed with the upgrade.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 11:00 am to OweO
quote:
You ever see tits on a bull? That is equivalent to a soundbar. Unless you get one with a sub woofer or something.
I was of that mind set for a number of years but the higher end sound bars are pretty impressive now. I still prefer a separate speaker set up but for a small room or for folks that just want the plug an play simplicity, there are some impressive sounding options out there.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 11:03 am to yakster
quote:Samsung, and I don't even use the TVs. Based on a decent amount of research and Andrew Robinson's Youtube channel.
Or is there another brand that you prefer.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 11:23 am to yakster
I got the JBL 500MK2 5.1 Channel.
$649 on Amazon.
It has been a good purchase. Great sound
$649 on Amazon.
It has been a good purchase. Great sound
Posted on 4/17/26 at 1:14 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
I was of that mind set for a number of years but the higher end sound bars are pretty impressive now. I still prefer a separate speaker set up but for a small room or for folks that just want the plug an play simplicity, there are some impressive sounding options out there.
I am going to have to take a look at them to see whats available now.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:25 pm to OweO
quote:
I am going to have to take a look at them to see whats available now.
You def get what you pay for in that market. Sub $300 are usually not great. Better than out the box TV sound , but that about it. The Denon DHT S517 with sub is my bedroom system and it cost around $500.00. Works perfect for that room. My den has the Samsung S60D bar and I got the associated sub and rear surrounds. All together around $800 and is a decent small living room/den set up. Nothing compared to my living room full separate speaker and receiver set up but that cost 3 times as much. The really expensive, like $1500 plus sound bar systems can start to give a lower cost separate set up a run for their money imo. Really depends on the size of the room and your listening location relative to the set up.
This post was edited on 4/17/26 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:33 pm to ThuperThumpin
With the receiver, do you also use it as a stereo? Awhile back I was looking at stereos just because its been awhile since I had mine and.. well music today is made to be listened to from headphones are Bluetooth speakers and sometimes I just get the itch to want to listen to the music I listened to growing up in the way they were made to be listened to.
If so, how do you listen to your music?
If so, how do you listen to your music?
Posted on 4/17/26 at 3:15 pm to OweO
quote:
With the receiver, do you also use it as a stereo? Awhile back I was looking at stereos just because its been awhile since I had mine and.. well music today is made to be listened to from headphones are Bluetooth speakers and sometimes I just get the itch to want to listen to the music I listened to growing up in the way they were made to be listened to.
If so, how do you listen to your music?
Occasionally I'll crank my main system with some tunes in just stereo mode but along with the sound bar systems it mostly for shows and movies. I mostly listen to music in my car or with headphones at the gym or when doing chores. I do miss the old days of youth with my first Kentwood stereo and a pair of Bose 301 speakers blasting in our rec room.
If i was just wanting to get a system for listening to music I would get a solid receiver with bluetooth and nice pair of book shelf or floor standing speakers over a sound bar for sure.
This post was edited on 4/17/26 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 4/17/26 at 4:56 pm to OweO
quote:
You ever see tits on a bull?
We were riding horses through a pasture full of cattle. My sister, about 10 at the time, looked at a bull and said, "Look at that cow with one big titty!"
Popular
Back to top

0










