Started By
Message

re: So-called "moon landing"

Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by slacker130
Your mom
Member since Jul 2010
8940 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

40 something years of production


wrong, but you're at least consistently wrong.
Posted by Tmcgin
BATON ROUGE
Member since Jun 2010
6384 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:22 pm to
I'll go with whatever Q and the Bammer posters
say. They nail all the conspiracy deals
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
91584 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Weird hate for the moon rover because their own cars could've never did that



I may could be persuaded by some logical claims and arguments


so you're in the 'we bolted a car onto the moon lander that came out with just a simple nudge on a rope' and 'we knew what kind of fuel to put in it to make it work in both -200 degrees and 200+ degrees on a rock with no atmosphere' aren't logical questions?
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32990 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:33 pm to
Do you think we're going to land in the moon here in a couple hours?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85392 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

so you're in the 'we bolted a car onto the moon lander that came out with just a simple nudge on a rope' and 'we knew what kind of fuel to put in it to make it work in both -200 degrees and 200+ degrees on a rock with no atmosphere' aren't logical questions?



you know we could simulate all of this...right? like it wasn't a guess
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
66942 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

so you're in the 'we bolted a car onto the moon lander that came out with just a simple nudge on a rope' and 'we knew what kind of fuel to put in it to make it work in both -200 degrees and 200+ degrees on a rock with no atmosphere' aren't logical questions?

This is exactly what I'm talking about, you don't even know how the rover was powered.

Yet it definitely couldn't have worked because...reasons?...
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16698 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

we knew what kind of fuel to put in it to make it work in both -200 degrees and 200+ degrees on a rock with no atmosphere

What do you think powered the lunar rover?
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
66942 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

you know we could simulate all of this...right? like it wasn't a guess


By his logic, all of the early submarines must've been crushed like tin cans as we didn't know what pressures that they should be built to withstand.

Don't get me started on some of the test aircraft and other extreme vehicles that have been developed.

Livin' on a prayer...
This post was edited on 2/22/24 at 12:49 pm
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25166 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

What do you think powered the lunar rover?


Clearly, it was powered by magical green cheese.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
91584 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

By his logic, all of the early submarines must've been crushed like tin cans as we didn't know what pressures that they should be built to withstand.


if our planet didn't have any oceans and we were 'guessing' what it would be like to put them in an ocean on a planet on the other side of the galaxy and get it right the first time?

then, yes.

tell me again about all the simulations we were doing in the 60s on a piece of paper that didn't require us to actually test on the surface of the moon.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91347 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

yes, completely successful and the feel-good story of SPIRIT and OPPORUNITY running around for a decade after they first landed. just like those 6 flawless moon landings & takeoffs


We made up Mars successful landings but I assume the failed ones that were huge embarrassments were an oversight?
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
66942 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

if our planet didn't have any oceans and we were 'guessing' what it would be like to put them in an ocean on a planet on the other side of the galaxy and get it right the first time? 

then, yes.

tell me again about all the simulations we were doing in the 60s on a piece of paper that didn't require us to actually test on the surface of the moon


Oh...you don't realize that the surface of the moon can be replicated here on Earth...yikes
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
91584 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

We made up Mars successful landings but I assume the failed ones that were huge embarrassments were an oversight?


you do understand how to sell a story right? you have to have elements of drama and adversity or it doesn't seem believable.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
65370 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

I think the 60s moon stuff has been pretty thoroughly debunked.


It never ceases to amaze me the low IQ people that hang out around here
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
91584 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Oh...you don't realize that the surface of the moon can be replicated here on Earth...yikes


absolutely i do!

we did it on the sound stage in Area 51!

THROW THE TOWEL. this thread is over.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
66942 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:02 pm to
OP swears the Wright Brothers didn't fly at Kitty Hawk because they didn't crash and die first.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17153 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

the idiots you're speaking to, also think the nebulae etc are fantastically colorful. shhh, dont tell them that is after-effects added to juice up a taxpaying population of sheep.

Colors are just the brain's interpretation of electromagnetic radiation within the visible light spectrum. That visible light has a specific wavelength and frequency. We can measure the visible light spectrum from astrological bodies which can be used to generate an image.
This post was edited on 2/22/24 at 1:28 pm
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
22898 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:03 pm to
Questions for you dumbfrick rednecks:

Why did the US stop "faking" trips to the Moon?

Why haven't we faked a Mars landing?
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
91584 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

OP swears the Wright Brothers didn't fly AN AIRPLANE ON THE MOON because they didn't crash and die first HAVING NEVER BEEN THERE TO DO TEST RUNS.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
9944 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Why did the US stop "faking" trips to the Moon?

We ran out of production money

quote:

Why haven't we faked a Mars landing?


Stanley Kubrick died
Jump to page
Page First 23 24 25 26 27 ... 49
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 25 of 49Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram