Started By
Message

re: So Britain and France declared war on Germany for invading Poland

Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:08 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71142 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

There was very little they could do directly to stop Germany.


I mean...they could have invaded from the west while the vast majority of Germany's armed forces were advancing through Poland, which is what the German high command feared would happen. Hitler gambled that the British and French wouldn't do anything to help the Poles.
Posted by Tigris
Cloud Cuckoo Land
Member since Jul 2005
13133 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

A lot of what we are told and taught is just propaganda.

"History is a set of lies that people have agreed upon" - Napoleon
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
22015 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:33 pm to
France took a totally defensive approach to the war against Germany, preferring to wait behind the Maginot Line. England had no physical way to "attack" from England. But the lack of a treaty was the real excuse.
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
23449 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:52 pm to
Again????
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
11693 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:54 pm to
Was this babby's first redpill over how fricked up the mainstream view of WW2 is?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111402 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:56 pm to
No matter what the media sells you, war is not “good vs evil”

It’s govt vs govt. The winner then writes the story after the war is over
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
55274 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

it was too late.


Oh, sure. The Western Allies considered the Soviet conquest of Finland as an accomplished fact and it was too late to help Finland.

But, the German conquests of 1939 and 1940 were not considered accomplished facts and were not considered to be "too late", and waged all out war to liberate those places from the Evil Conqueror.

Is that about right?



Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150131 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:59 pm to
its been 80 years in the making but im glad weve finally put this issue to rest
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150131 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

No matter what the media sells you, war is not “good vs evil”

It’s govt vs govt. The winner then writes the story after the war is over

you are right 99% of the time. ww2 is the actual 1% though
This post was edited on 12/6/20 at 7:00 pm
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
55274 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

"History is a set of lies that people have agreed upon" - Napoleon




I'm not quite that cynical and yet I appreciate this quote.

I'd like to remind everyone that Poland and Finland weren't the only innocent neutrals that the Soviets invaded and conquered. During the Nazi Soviet Pact in 1940, the Soviets invaded Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Romania, all innocent neutrals, and took over all of those countries, except for Romania, they only stole one part of Romania. And the Western Allies weren't bothered too much by any of that, either.

This post was edited on 12/6/20 at 7:07 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111402 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

you are right 99% of the time. ww2 is the actual 1% though


I don’t agree.
Posted by BatonRougeGirl
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
29 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 8:28 pm to
We became allies with Russia only after Germany invaded Russia- Battle of Stalingrad. Hitler broke the non-aggression pact with Stalin.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
19947 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 8:40 pm to
There was a lot of push back at the time amongat the Allies about dealing with Russia. General Patton was extremely outspoken about Russia being the bigger problem and enemy to Western Democracy than the Nazis. Its hard to argue which of those two were worse.

The bottom line is we fricked up big time by trying to appease Stalin by basically ceding Eastern Europe to him. Its hard to jusge the motivations in 2020 of the decision makers in 1940. I would guess the biggest reason, from America's perspective, is we already got dragged into yet another European war AND were fighting the Japs. While Russia and Japan had their share of conflicts over territory, whos to say they wouldnt have teamed up once Germany was done. I wouldnt have put anything past that murderous commie bastard Stalin or those crazy Japs.

We wanted to cool things down and move forward peacefully. Its hard to say what would have happened had we pressed the issue. With the advent of the atomic bomb, its possible we could have nuked Moscow and in the process saved a whole lot more Russian and Eastern Europeans a lifetime of toil and heartache. Or we could have trigfered mutually assured destruction.



Either way, frick the Nazis and frick the Commies. Weve got a whole generation of idiots in this country who need to be force fed a long hard look at what the generations before then did. frick these ungrateful motherfrickers who arent deserving of that sacrifice.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
19947 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 8:42 pm to
Nm/double post
This post was edited on 12/6/20 at 8:43 pm
Posted by adavis
North of I-10
Member since Aug 2007
5965 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 8:55 pm to
War between Russia and Germany was still likely, so there was no need to make the Soviet Union an enemy yet.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55497 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Russia also didn’t exactly formally publicize what they did. And it happened a few weeks later. And declaring war on another massive country would have been a bold move under the circumstances.

And it would have forced the USSR into the Axis camp. Stupid as hell.
Posted by WillWorkForLSUTicket
Tiger Country
Member since Aug 2005
843 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Britain and France had a treaty with Poland, specifically agreeing to defend it from a German invasion. No such clause about Russia. If you're saying itvwas hypocritical, no argument from me. But it wasn't arbitrary


This, plus everyone had long memories going back to WW1. Germany was still the boogie man of Europe. Everyone was especially wary of them.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105287 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

The bottom line is we fricked up big time by trying to appease Stalin by basically ceding Eastern Europe to him. Its hard to jusge the motivations in 2020 of the decision makers in 1940.


The US public wouldn't have stood for continuing the European war vs our recent allies. The Army in Europe would have mutinied and the folks back home would have supported them. There was nearly a mutiny over the initial plan to ship them en masse to the Pacific. Thus the brass came up with a point system allowing men with the longest overseas service to demobilize and go home. Patton was full of fight. His men weren't.
Posted by saturday
Pronoun (Baw)
Member since Feb 2007
7954 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

The enemy of my enemy is my friend






This is the answer to the OP's question.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
21126 posts
Posted on 12/6/20 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

The enemy of my enemy is my friend

I have 70 years of Mideast policy proving this is woefully untrue.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram