- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Senate approves TOPS changes
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:31 pm
LINK
"Everyone gets something". I only skimmed it. It does mention "Morrish said under the law, money is only available to students who make a 26 or higher on the ACT".
And it sounds like if you have to sit out for a year due to finances, you won't lose TOPS like you would now if you sit out. How would you prove that it was due to finances and not "Oh I needed/wanted a break"?
Link corrected. Sorry. It did leave me confused.
"Everyone gets something". I only skimmed it. It does mention "Morrish said under the law, money is only available to students who make a 26 or higher on the ACT".
And it sounds like if you have to sit out for a year due to finances, you won't lose TOPS like you would now if you sit out. How would you prove that it was due to finances and not "Oh I needed/wanted a break"?
Link corrected. Sorry. It did leave me confused.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:31 pm to tiger91
Your Facebook link doesn't work
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:32 pm to kingbob
Should have been done a long time ago. We spent way too long investing in too many students who would do little to nothing for the state with their degrees.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:35 pm to tiger91
quote:
Senate Education Chairman Dan “Blade” Morrish called his Senate Bill 470 a safeguard.
Apparently the Ed chairman used to be an American Gladiator
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:35 pm to tiger91
Nah. 26 and higher get TOPS now and its spread evenly throughout
Better link
Better link
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:35 pm to tiger91
Read that as:
Senate approves TPOS changes
Senate approves TPOS changes
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:36 pm to kingbob
quote:
Cliffs?
Instead of awarding full scholarships to smart kids (26+ ACT), they are awarding partial scholarships so that the tards can go to college too.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:36 pm to tiger91
There is a massive difference between a 26 and a 30+ on the ACT, yet the idiots in the legislature want to treat them all the same. Gonna lose a lot of high performing students to other states bc of this
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:38 pm to tiger91
So does that meant you can start college a year after you graduate high school?
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:39 pm to Pectus
quote:
So does that meant you can start college a year after you graduate high school?
Maybe if you can't pay for it yes according to these changes that passed??? Again, I'm still somewhat confused.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:41 pm to Pectus
Watching the Senate session for today. Talk about a non-stop circle jerk. Who woulda thought that a large part of the Senate's business includes giving condolences, welcoming all sorts of guests, and giving certain days titles. April 21st was designated School-Based Health Care Awareness Day in Louisiana.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:42 pm to tiger91
All this does is make it easier for JBE to raise taxes.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:43 pm to DrSteveBrule
quote:
Should have been done a long time ago. We spent way too long investing in too many students who would do little to nothing for the state with their degrees.
I agree but to me a 26 is on the high side. I have a dog in the fight as I have a high school senior but he's above that so the 26 doesn't affect him. I know kids who are taking dual enrollment classes and have a 4.0 through ULL while they also have a 4.0 or close to it in my sons class ... yet they didn't make a 26 on the ACT. I just think a 26 is a bit high.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:43 pm to Esquire
quote:
Instead of awarding full scholarships to smart kids (26+ ACT), they are awarding partial scholarships so that the tards can go to college too.
That's not how I read it
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:43 pm to DrSteveBrule
quote:Sorry for joining the military then moving to Texas upon my military exit.
We spent way too long investing in too many students who would do little to nothing for the state with their degrees.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:44 pm to jdd48
Watching that shite would probably make me pull my hair out.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:44 pm to Dr. Shultz
Shultz he was replying to my op which I edited ... at first I skimmed it so fast that I took away that EVERYONE (4.0/29, 2.5/22) would all get something equal. He responded to my bad info.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:44 pm to Dr. Shultz
It was inevitable but this will lead to a larger talent exodus from Louisiana.
The Senate Bill
Don't see the 26 ACT score minimum in there
The Senate Bill
Don't see the 26 ACT score minimum in there
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:45 pm to tiger91
Perhaps 24-25 might be a better compromise but 20 is just too damn low. That is literally the benchmark for even being eligible for most schools.
Popular
Back to top

18








