Started By
Message
locked post

Scientists date Shroud of Turin back to the first century in new study

Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:31 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68288 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:31 pm
quote:

Scientists are inching closer to determining whether the famed Turin Shroud is indeed the cloth in which Jesus was wrapped. Experts have now stated that the linen can be traced back to the beginning of the AD era, aligning with the time when Jesus was crucified.

The shroud, which bears a faint outline of a bearded man believed to be an imprint left by Jesus's body, was first displayed in 1350 and has since been referred to as the Holy Shroud.

The latest research, conducted by the Institute of Crystallography of the National Research Council, employed X-ray techniques to date the material. However, this finding contradicts previous studies from the 1980s, which suggested the shroud only dates back to the Middle Ages, casting doubt on its existence 2000 years ago.


quote:

This study focuses on the aging of flax cellulose and compares it to the time since the product was manufactured, reports the Daily Star.

The Shroud of Turin, housed in the San Giovanni Battista since 1578, has been a subject of debate due to radiocarbon dating analyses from 1988 suggesting it's only seven centuries old. However, a new study challenges this, stating: "The data profiles were fully compatible with analogous measurements obtained on a linen sample whose dating, according to historical records, is 55-74 AD, found at Masada, Israel".

The researchers also compared the shroud's samples with those from the Middle Ages and concluded: "To make the present result compatible with that of the 1988 radiocarbon test, the Shroud of Turn should have been conserved during its hypothetical seven centuries of life at a secular room temperature very close to the maximum values registered on the earth". Dr Liberato De Caro, who spearheaded the new research, argues that the 1988 test is unreliable because: "Fabric samples are usually subject to all kinds of contamination, which cannot be completely removed from the dated specimen."


LINK
Posted by HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Member since Jul 2011
31417 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:35 pm to
Scam
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
40396 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:36 pm to
If it’s from when Jesus died why do they need to date it? Do they not know when he died?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68288 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

If it’s from when Jesus died why do they need to date it? Do they not know when he died?



Radio Carbon dating placed it in the 14th century in 1988. It was big news. However, in the late-90s questions began to arise about the validity of the test.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
33943 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:41 pm to
Told ya.
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
8372 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:44 pm to
Rome has spoken. It’s from the Middle Ages.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
21661 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:23 pm to
The 1980s study dated a patch, that has been proven.

If anyone is interested in having their mind blown research the Shroud. There is some crazy stuff the happened to make that image.

It and the image of Our Lady in Mexico City are amazing scientifically speaking.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
75316 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

it’s from when Jesus died why do they need to date it? Do they not know when he died?


Determining the age tells you if it's a fake or (possibly) the actual burial cloth.

Ideally you would match the blood to confirmed Eucharistic miracles.
Posted by FearTheFish
Member since Dec 2007
4068 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Shroud of Turin
Protestants will call it an idol
Posted by Tangineck
Mandeville
Member since Nov 2017
2354 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

the Daily Star.


Hammond newspaper doing work
Posted by PhysicsGuy
Member since Apr 2024
50 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:40 pm to
Pretty sure this is like 2-3 years old.
Posted by shadyone2
Member since Oct 2017
1110 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:49 pm to
Try this one
Daily Mail
This post was edited on 8/20/24 at 8:01 pm
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
13284 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:25 pm to
Isaiah 52:13-15 states Jesus was beaten/marred beyond recognition. Given this, the Shroud of Turin has no standing.
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22447 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Scientists are inching closer to determining whether the famed Turin Shroud is indeed the cloth in which Jesus was wrapped


Sounds like they’re just closer to determining if it was from roughly the same time period.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
19056 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:28 pm to
Okay, what in the hell is the image? Is it something from someone or just art work?
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
19556 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

It and the image of Our Lady in Mexico City are amazing scientifically speaking.



Was listening to a podcast driving in the woods late one night about our lady Guadalupe, and it freaked me hell out. That story is amazing.
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
13284 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:43 pm to
Is the face/image of a man on a burial cloth that some have tied to Jesus. Is totally inconsistent with how the prophet Isaiah described Jesus as a result of His crucifixion and I doubt seriously we were left with a graven image...but what do I know!!!!
Posted by Tuscaloosa
12x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
49179 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

Protestants will call it an idol


If you start praying to it and asking it for healing, yeah probably.
Posted by YNWA
Member since Nov 2015
7066 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 9:56 pm to
For the shroud to be Jesus he would have had to have been a real person, which he was not. Therefore the shroud is not Jesus.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
12x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
49179 posts
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

For the shroud to be Jesus he would have had to have been a real person, which he was not.


Lmaaaaooooooooooooo

Someone please give this guy some attention on the internet.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram