- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Scientists date Shroud of Turin back to the first century in new study
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:31 pm
quote:
Scientists are inching closer to determining whether the famed Turin Shroud is indeed the cloth in which Jesus was wrapped. Experts have now stated that the linen can be traced back to the beginning of the AD era, aligning with the time when Jesus was crucified.
The shroud, which bears a faint outline of a bearded man believed to be an imprint left by Jesus's body, was first displayed in 1350 and has since been referred to as the Holy Shroud.
The latest research, conducted by the Institute of Crystallography of the National Research Council, employed X-ray techniques to date the material. However, this finding contradicts previous studies from the 1980s, which suggested the shroud only dates back to the Middle Ages, casting doubt on its existence 2000 years ago.
quote:
This study focuses on the aging of flax cellulose and compares it to the time since the product was manufactured, reports the Daily Star.
The Shroud of Turin, housed in the San Giovanni Battista since 1578, has been a subject of debate due to radiocarbon dating analyses from 1988 suggesting it's only seven centuries old. However, a new study challenges this, stating: "The data profiles were fully compatible with analogous measurements obtained on a linen sample whose dating, according to historical records, is 55-74 AD, found at Masada, Israel".
The researchers also compared the shroud's samples with those from the Middle Ages and concluded: "To make the present result compatible with that of the 1988 radiocarbon test, the Shroud of Turn should have been conserved during its hypothetical seven centuries of life at a secular room temperature very close to the maximum values registered on the earth". Dr Liberato De Caro, who spearheaded the new research, argues that the 1988 test is unreliable because: "Fabric samples are usually subject to all kinds of contamination, which cannot be completely removed from the dated specimen."
LINK
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:36 pm to RollTide1987
If it’s from when Jesus died why do they need to date it? Do they not know when he died?
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:38 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
If it’s from when Jesus died why do they need to date it? Do they not know when he died?
Radio Carbon dating placed it in the 14th century in 1988. It was big news. However, in the late-90s questions began to arise about the validity of the test.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 6:44 pm to RollTide1987
Rome has spoken. It’s from the Middle Ages.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:23 pm to RollTide1987
The 1980s study dated a patch, that has been proven.
If anyone is interested in having their mind blown research the Shroud. There is some crazy stuff the happened to make that image.
It and the image of Our Lady in Mexico City are amazing scientifically speaking.
If anyone is interested in having their mind blown research the Shroud. There is some crazy stuff the happened to make that image.
It and the image of Our Lady in Mexico City are amazing scientifically speaking.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:29 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
it’s from when Jesus died why do they need to date it? Do they not know when he died?
Determining the age tells you if it's a fake or (possibly) the actual burial cloth.
Ideally you would match the blood to confirmed Eucharistic miracles.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:35 pm to RollTide1987
quote:Protestants will call it an idol
Shroud of Turin
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:37 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
the Daily Star.
Hammond newspaper doing work
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:40 pm to RollTide1987
Pretty sure this is like 2-3 years old.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 7:49 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:25 pm to RollTide1987
Isaiah 52:13-15 states Jesus was beaten/marred beyond recognition. Given this, the Shroud of Turin has no standing.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:28 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Scientists are inching closer to determining whether the famed Turin Shroud is indeed the cloth in which Jesus was wrapped
Sounds like they’re just closer to determining if it was from roughly the same time period.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:28 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Okay, what in the hell is the image? Is it something from someone or just art work?
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:31 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
It and the image of Our Lady in Mexico City are amazing scientifically speaking.
Was listening to a podcast driving in the woods late one night about our lady Guadalupe, and it freaked me hell out. That story is amazing.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:43 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
Is the face/image of a man on a burial cloth that some have tied to Jesus. Is totally inconsistent with how the prophet Isaiah described Jesus as a result of His crucifixion and I doubt seriously we were left with a graven image...but what do I know!!!!
Posted on 8/20/24 at 8:50 pm to FearTheFish
quote:
Protestants will call it an idol
If you start praying to it and asking it for healing, yeah probably.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 9:56 pm to RollTide1987
For the shroud to be Jesus he would have had to have been a real person, which he was not. Therefore the shroud is not Jesus.
Posted on 8/20/24 at 10:09 pm to YNWA
quote:
For the shroud to be Jesus he would have had to have been a real person, which he was not.
Lmaaaaooooooooooooo
Someone please give this guy some attention on the internet.
Popular
Back to top
