Started By
Message

re: Rolling Stone reveals their top rock songs of the 21st century so far

Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36977 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

You twats are so sensitive about you boomer rock. That’s not even my favorite song by them, and I’ve seen them in concert, so blow me. I wouldn’t even consider myself some huge fan of theirs. I’m not an angry old man like you.


Holy fricking irony.

What an odd defense you offer considering i never claimed to be a fan of The Who. I said “a song like…”

And my point unsurprisingly sailed well over your head.

Take another Adderall and try and focus millennial twat.
This post was edited on 10/28/26 at 12:27 pm
Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
33148 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:29 pm to
TRASH list.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
87062 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

How can someone know if new music sucks if they aren’t listening to it?


It's always my biggest peeve in these threads.

A bunch of dudes who stopped trying to find new music after college 25 years ago commenting on the state of current music.

Its so tired.
This post was edited on 10/28/26 at 12:32 pm
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
65624 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Robin Masters


Shitty fricking poster. Always have been. I don’t take adderall, and I’m not a millennial. Like I said, I’m just not an angry old man like you and half of the posters in this thread.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36977 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Well, I think it's a decent song, which is enough to make it worthwhile in my book. But as I said earlier, I strongly disagree with the #1 ranking. Had I made the list, it wouldn't have been on there at all. Maybe it cracks my top 5,000, which is still a pretty impressive distinction when you consider we're talking about a quarter century's worth of music. There's an enormous amount of room between "worth listening to", which it is, and "the greatest song of the last 25 years," which it absolutely isn't. It's not even the band's best song.


I feel the same about the inclusion of A National Anthem. I’m a big Radiohead fan and that just isn’t one of their best. Maybe one of their catchiest but certainly not their best of last 25 years.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
87062 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

And my point unsurprisingly sailed well over your head.


Your point went over no one's head. It was just dumb. Literally no one, especially in this thread, is arguing that Maps is the best song of the century.

Rolling Stones puts out these rage bait lists all the time for engagement.

You trying to use this list as some indictment on modern music at large is just silly.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36977 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Shitty fricking poster. Always have been.


Always nice to meet a fan. I wish I could comment on your history but I’ve never noticed you before now.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38888 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

It's always my biggest peeve in these threads.

A bunch of dudes who stopped trying to find new music after college 25 years ago commenting on the state of current music.
Roger was the king of this, but I've seen plenty of others on this board insist that '70s rock is objectively superior to everything that came before or after it. Which is an absurdly confident claim to make about one of the most inherently subjective forms of human expression. There's nothing wrong with preferring the music you grew up with, but confusing your personal nostalgia with some universal standard of artistic excellence is ridiculous.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
22182 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

BS



I listen to a lot of music and Ive never heard this song. I just went on youtube, never heard it.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36977 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

You trying to use this list as some indictment on modern music at large is just silly.


It wasn’t an indictment on modern music it was an indictment of popular music.

And unwittingly you have fully corroborated the sentiment.

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
87062 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

It wasn’t an indictment on modern music it was an indictment of popular music.


Your quote

quote:

as a metaphor for just how far we’ve lowered our expectations over the last couple generations


Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38888 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:46 pm to
And I forgot my other pet peeve: the insistence that modern rock music is somehow inferior because it's "derivative." As if every form of music since the first caveman figured out he could whistle or bang two sticks together hasn't been derivative of something that came before it. That's literally how music evolves.

Apparently, borrowing from your influences was artistic genius until sometime around 2001, when it suddenly became evidence that music was dead.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
22182 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Roger was the king of this, but I've seen plenty of others on this board insist that '70s rock is objectively superior to everything that came before or after it. Which is an absurdly confident claim to make about one of the most inherently subjective forms of human expression. There's nothing wrong with preferring the music you grew up with, but confusing your personal nostalgia with some universal standard of artistic excellence is ridiculous.


I think about this often with technology being where it is today. We are no doubt past our best music days, especially from a talent standpoint.

I was born in the 80s and looking back through all the rock etc. I've listened to I would say the 70's was probably the pinnacle, that doesn't mean there werent more talented musicians that came along at their craft but music is nowhere near where it used to be.
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
11451 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

their top rock songs of the 21st century

quote:

“99 Problems” – Jay-Z (2003)

Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
4743 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

the way some of you revel in being completely out of touch is fascinating to me

Thanks, I guess.

I'm not even pretending and have been playing bass along with YouTube 70s and 80s music all morning.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38888 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I was born in the 80s and looking back through all the rock etc. I've listened to I would say the 70's was probably the pinnacle, that doesn't mean there werent more talented musicians that came along at their craft but music is nowhere near where it used to be.
I'll meet you halfway and concede that the '70s were probably the pinnacle of rock music's cultural relevance and influence. But I strongly disagree that they represented the pinnacle of artistic achievement. Those are two very different things. Cultural dominance isn't a measure of artistic quality, and popularity isn't the same thing as talent.
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
11216 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:53 pm to
Could be some truth to this. Technology is stifling the development of our youth's creativity.

Whether it just being kids going outside and playing, pretending, dreaming. It's just not happening when they are plugged into their devices at an impressionable age.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
22182 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:55 pm to
Sabotage - Beastie Boys should've been in the top 25.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
87062 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Sabotage - Beastie Boys should've been in the top 25.


1994
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
22182 posts
Posted on 10/28/26 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

hose are two very different things. Cultural dominance isn't a measure of artistic quality, and popularity isn't the same thing as talent.


Agreed.

I just feel like they had to put more time and effort into the art.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram