Started By
Message

re: Rittenhouse NOT GUILTY on all counts; concern over violence and riots growing

Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:11 pm to
Posted by lsufb1912
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2021
5965 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Faith in humanity slightly restored.


Well lets wait until the protests, that are coming soon, are over with before we determine that.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
114287 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:12 pm to
Cry harder
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
170227 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:12 pm to
Let's not forget the victims



Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
33783 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:13 pm to
Imagine Kyle plugging a few more creeps the same day he is acquitted.

Rit-ten-house!
frick Yeah!

Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
104031 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

quote:
don't disagree with the not guilty verdict, but I do wonder why the weapons charge got thrown out.


Because he wasn’t guilty of it.



More precisely, what they were attempting to charge him with there was deemed not even to be a crime.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22282 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

The law is contradicted by the statute.


By which statute?
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
34297 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

This makes me feel like writing a song.

“If You See Kyle.”


I actually had this song in my head earlier. Could easily substitute Kyle for Bill or Phil.

Don't mess with Phil
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
33783 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:14 pm to
Ready to blow
more pedophiles
away now
Posted by chadau79
Daphne, AL
Member since Sep 2009
3417 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

The law I've Googled said 21
'

I would suggest not being a google attorney. My 8 year old soon will be legally carrying his shotgun this weekend.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22282 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:19 pm to
Here's the statute if you would like to read it for yourself:

Wisc. RS 948.60

Here's the relevant portion:

quote:

(1) In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2)
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3)
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
19174 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

My 8 year old soon will be legally carrying his shotgun this weekend.


Federal laws are different than state laws. Purchasing firearms laws are different than possessing firearms laws. Minors having a firearm while accompanied by their parent or another adult is different than a minor possessing a firearm while alone. So many people have been talking about this the whole case without specifying what statute they think he did or didn't violate.
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
13859 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I don't disagree with the not guilty verdict, but I do wonder why the weapons charge got thrown out.


Because it's legal for a 17 y/o to possess a long gun in WI.

The prosecutor apparently didn't know the difference between a rifle and a SBR.



Posted by adp
Member since Jul 2015
2735 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:22 pm to
Courageous Lives Matter
Posted by cable
Member since Oct 2018
9720 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Imagine Kyle plugging a few more creeps the same day he is acquitted.



When does he get his firearm back?
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

A lot of predictable comments from you hillbillies



if you endorsed a conviction here, you are basically endorsing a witch trial based on emotions and not the facts of the case
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43675 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

The law I've Googled said 21


It helps if you read the entire statute, and not the parts that reaffirm your personal beliefs.

Posted by Jh22586
Member since Oct 2019
667 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:24 pm to


Kyle Rittenhouse for sheriff!!

Protecting the home’s and innocent by getting rid of garbage
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
85120 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I don't disagree with the not guilty verdict, but I do wonder why the weapons charge got thrown out.


Because he broke no laws. Jesus, you lefties are slow.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
58159 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:26 pm to
About time we see some real justice
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Where I Am
Member since Nov 2011
2735 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 1:28 pm to
Yes. In denial. He can’t figure out why what he wanted to happen...didn’t happen. LOL
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram