- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for the atheists here
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:34 am to FieldEngineer
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:34 am to FieldEngineer
quote:
That's because there is no evidence to suggest otherwise.
When eye witness testimony is not accepted as fact, what then can take its place? What more can be done to make one believe?
Stubbornness clouds.
Selfishness abounds.
One has the ability to select their choice. That's what is fact.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:38 am to BestBanker
quote:
You're assumpive response to the OP is filled with assumptions that assume that you know what happens when people die, unless
you're already dead?
Maybe there is a memory cell that you're overlooking? Hmm?
(See this can go on forever until you decide where your beliefs are anchored.)
No, that’s crazy. Glory to the Flying Spaghetti Monster! May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage!
You’re basically saying that we can make stuff up all day long, and anyone who doesn’t accept that as a possibility is closed minded. Right?
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:39 am to BestBanker
quote:
eye witness testimony
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:39 am to terriblegreen
quote:Pretty much exactly how I feel.
I consider myself an agnostic. I have no memory of before I was born. I suppose it'll be that way after I day. I'm not saying there isn't a god, but I've seen a lot of fricked up shite in my life. I have trouble reconciling that with a loving god.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:41 am to BestBanker
quote:
And stating your belief in evidence that is unproven as fact is also wrong.
I don’t think you understand atheism. It’s the LACK of belief in supreme beings and what not due to the absence of evidence.
I’m open to the idea of supreme beings. There just isn’t any evidence that suggests what that could be. Humanity hasn’t figured it out, and may never.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:41 am to RidiculousHype
I joined Morpheus and took the red pill...I'm woke. Ain't no atheist living in blissfully ignorance
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:41 am to FieldEngineer
You got emotionally charged here when valid points were made. Excellent.
So you believe you're preprogrammed and can't make choices in your life. Ok.
You need read what you type before you hit submit. People make up stuff all day long and call it religion, science, news, etc. Who's acting closed minded here?
quote:
No, that’s crazy. Glory to the Flying Spaghetti Monster! May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage!
So you believe you're preprogrammed and can't make choices in your life. Ok.
quote:
You’re basically saying that we can make stuff up all day long, and anyone who doesn’t accept that as a possibility is closed minded. Right?
You need read what you type before you hit submit. People make up stuff all day long and call it religion, science, news, etc. Who's acting closed minded here?
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:43 am to noonan
quote:
quote:
How do you know that they could?
I don't. It's pure speculation. I just don't know why some (not all) atheists completely rule out the possibility described in the OP.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:44 am to FieldEngineer
quote:
I don’t think you understand atheism.
You've just proven my point on selfishness earlier with "I". I'm not here to discuss atheism, but the rather the OP's posit on his cellular thoughts of the great gathering of cells.
Also, I do understand atheism.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:45 am to RidiculousHype
Because it's stupid...
Atoms have no memory.
Atoms have no memory.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:46 am to RidiculousHype
quote:
I’m basically saying that even if one doesn’t, we might have “life” after death.
Well, of course there's life after death. When I'm buried, I'm still organic material that will be eventually be used/consumed by bugs, dissolve into earth used by plant life, etc. Death is part of nature, a very important part of the cycle of life.
But resurrecting somehow as a facsimile of oneself? That's an illogical thought, imo.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:47 am to FieldEngineer
So you, as a possible engineer, dispose of one of the scientific methods of validation of evidence in your elimination of visual confirmation of such?? Quite the conundrum.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:51 am to Displaced
quote:
Because it's stupid...
Atoms have no memory.
Right...but your memory is all contained inside your brain, right?
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:53 am to BestBanker
quote:
You got emotionally charged here when valid points were made. Excellent.
Not even a bit.
quote:
So you believe you're preprogrammed and can't make choices in your life. Ok.
Quite the opposite.
quote:
You need read what you type before you hit submit. People make up stuff all day long and call it religion, science, news, etc. Who's acting closed minded here?
This doesn’t even make sense.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:53 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Well, of course there's life after death. When I'm buried, I'm still organic material that will be eventually be used/consumed by bugs, dissolve into earth used by plant life, etc. Death is part of nature, a very important part of the cycle of life.
But resurrecting somehow as a facsimile of oneself? That's an illogical thought, imo.
I agree that the physical components that currently make up one's body will not resurrect into a new "you" later on this Earth.
But what if 10 trillion big bangs/crunches from now, the arrangement of physical components repeated in a different universe? How can we rule that possibility out, if time is infinite?
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:54 am to BestBanker
quote:
So you, as a possible engineer, dispose of one of the scientific methods of validation of evidence in your elimination of visual confirmation of such?? Quite the conundrum.
Use the scientific method to prove whatever deity you believe in is real.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:56 am to FieldEngineer
quote:that's not how the scientific method works...
Use the scientific method to prove whatever deity you believe in is real.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:57 am to RidiculousHype
quote:
But what if 10 trillion big bangs/crunches from now, the arrangement of physical components repeated in a different universe? How can we rule that possibility out, if time is infinite?
What if 10,000 monkeys were randomly typing on a keyboard? Would one eventually recreate the works of Shakespeare?
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:58 am to Displaced
quote:
that's not how the scientific method works...
Do tell.
You have a theory. Try to prove it.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:58 am to LSUBoo
quote:
I suppose they could, and then there would be another person in the future exactly like me in the present.
I don't think it would be "me" again, though.
This is how the transporters in Star Trek work. They scan you and then destroy your body. Then they send the scan to a machine that creates an exact copy of you. It's not you though. It's a copy.
Popular
Back to top



1







