- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:15 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Actually it's the exact opposite. The gaps continue to decrease as our knowledge increases.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:20 am to Brazos
quote:
Actually it's the exact opposite. The gaps continue to decrease as our knowledge increases.
Actually it doesn't
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:27 am to reo45
Explosion is not the correct term. It was more of the compression cycle was over, then expansion started. I personally lean toward the oscillating universe theory, but I think Einstein moved away from it later in his life. If true, it open a ton of mind hurting questions.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:34 am to Brazos
quote:
Those gaps continue to decrease as our knowledge increases.
quote:
Actually it's the exact opposite. The gaps continue to decrease as our knowledge increases.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:36 am to reo45
If you look far enough back a Catholic munk first proposed the Big Bang theory but was discredited by the scientific community because it was to similar to Genesis’ “let there be light”.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:39 am to AUCE05
quote:
I personally lean toward the oscillating universe theory,
Maybe, but the universe is not only expanding but actually that expansion is accelerating. If oscillating we need to figure out how that acceleration stops so that gravity can pull it all back together again.
This post was edited on 9/17/18 at 7:43 am
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:40 am to reo45
quote:
Big Bang Theory
Not my kind of comedy but humor is subjective
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:43 am to DavidTheGnome
Yeah. Going theory is dark matter is the driver. Again, if this theory is true, the questions it opens is mind numbing. What is outside the "bubble?" What is the universe skin made of? If we can leave our bubble, can we escape time?
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:44 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
That doesn’t discredit the Big Bang though, everything points to that being true.
What you mean is, "we have this idea, it fits in the box, so until we know something else, its true.
The "big Bang Theory" is just that, a theory. Its one of the big ones that has no more proof or evidence than the existence of God.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:47 am to eatpie
quote:
The "big Bang Theory" is just that, a theory. Its one of the big ones that has no more proof or evidence than the existence of God.
Yeah, that's not true.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:48 am to eatpie
That's how science works. Someone develops a theory based on limited facts, and the longer it can't be disproven, the more credit it recieves in the community. Just because something is proven wrong, or we don't understand a topic doesn't mean the process doesn't work. The last thing we need to do is dismiss something because we don't understand it, and claim "god" is the source.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:00 am to eatpie
quote:
Its one of the big ones that has no more proof or evidence than the existence of God.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:13 am to reo45
quote:
For Creationists they face a similar conundrum: so, a creator created everything when he spoke it to existence. But, where did all matter and mass come from? Nothing?
According to the Bible, God always existed. This is a much bigger concept to understand.
This post was edited on 9/17/18 at 8:14 am
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:19 am to reo45
quote:
reo45
Hear, believe, repent, confess, be baptized, live a good life, get to Heaven and ask Him these questions.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:39 am to reo45
quote:My only problem is Kaley Cuoco is not naked in every scene.
Problem with Big Bang Theory
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:50 am to reo45
consider this premise for the sake of thought:
IF mankind has or has access to half of all the knowledge that exists, is it not possible that a creator exists in the other half of knowledge we do not have access to?
The problem is we always assume we have almost all of the knowledge- kind of prideful on our part
IF mankind has or has access to half of all the knowledge that exists, is it not possible that a creator exists in the other half of knowledge we do not have access to?
The problem is we always assume we have almost all of the knowledge- kind of prideful on our part
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:53 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
Trick questions. None of this is real. We're all inside a computer
So who created the computer?
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:54 am to reo45
We must live with the understanding that there is so much more for us to learn and keep seeking the answers. Creating a magical sky wizard because the questions are hard...is not the answer.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News