- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Plane collides with helicopter over Reagan International Airport; Looking in Potomac
Posted on 2/2/25 at 2:36 pm to TygerLyfe
Posted on 2/2/25 at 2:36 pm to TygerLyfe
quote:
Plus, that assumes the pilots got the latest altimeter setting
That thought crossed my mind as well. I believe the helicopter’s trip originated at a previous base than the one they had just departed prior to the collision.
Maybe they had the previous altimeter setting and never updated to the Ft. Belvoir altimeter and didn’t realize they had busted their restricted altitude.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 2:41 pm to WestSideTiger
No 50/50 about it. Air Traffic had resolved the conflict, however the helo failed to see and avoid. Day one VFR stuff. Massive failure by the helo crew.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 3:35 pm to RedFoxx
quote:
Plus, that assumes the pilots got the latest altimeter setting
The tower is required to provide the current altimeter setting at the time of initial contact and should be repeated back the pilot. This is a standard procedure.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 3:36 pm to Chopper 2
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. ETA: Downvoters prove this gentleman right about our lack of empathy.
This post was edited on 2/2/25 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 2/2/25 at 3:44 pm to 257WBY
quote:
Air Traffic had resolved the conflict
Did they though? Why because they handed their duty off to the helo crew and basically wiped their hands of it except for that last minute go behind callout to save face? No warning about being too high or off course or still heading straight for the incoming flight.
And what about their responsibility to the CRJ? If there was a controller more dedicated to the flight of the helo alone and not switching back and forth do you not think it would have made a difference?
I’m interested to see if a pattern is found where controllers are shown to have more reluctance in overriding the military flight crews to keep them in check.
And when I’m saying the ATC deserves half the blame I understand there may have been mitigating circumstances that night but they are ultimately responsible for those as well. This is not as much about the individual controller.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 3:51 pm to WestSideTiger
Most of these investigation reports I’ve seen point to multiple items. Unless it’s a single pilot that runs himself into the ground, if there’s multiple humans involved I’m sure the reports will mention everything that could have been done.
I’m sure ATC could have done more. I’m sure both helicopter pilots could have done more. I’m sure there’s something to blame on the Army and their aircraft maintenance and training program.
I’m not sure we’re going to get an official ‘gotchya’ like some feel is due.
I’m sure ATC could have done more. I’m sure both helicopter pilots could have done more. I’m sure there’s something to blame on the Army and their aircraft maintenance and training program.
I’m not sure we’re going to get an official ‘gotchya’ like some feel is due.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 3:51 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/2/25 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 2/2/25 at 4:03 pm to Chopper 2
quote:
The tower is required to provide the current altimeter setting at the time of initial contact and should be repeated back the pilot. This is a standard procedure.
I’m aware, but it means nothing if the crew doesn’t update their setting.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 4:05 pm to baldona
Ultimate fault here lies with the helicopter crew. They were at the wrong altitude.
But if the tower allowed them to use visual, which seems outside protocol according to Juan Brown, then they shoulder some of the blame.
But if the tower allowed them to use visual, which seems outside protocol according to Juan Brown, then they shoulder some of the blame.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 4:07 pm to kywildcatfanone
ATC here
There is nothing out of protocol by asking the helo to maintain visual separation if they report traffic in sight. Pilot applied visual separation is used all day everyday.
There is nothing out of protocol by asking the helo to maintain visual separation if they report traffic in sight. Pilot applied visual separation is used all day everyday.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 4:12 pm to WestSideTiger
quote:
Did they though? Why because they handed their duty off to the helo crew and basically wiped their hands of it
ATC didn’t “wipe their hands of it”
Once the helicopter says they have the aircraft in sight that is them accepting the VFR flight separation. It is on the helicopter crew to not fly into anything at that point.
ATC isn’t there to hold their hand.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 4:42 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
northshorebamaman
Posted on 2/2/25 at 4:53 pm to RedFoxx
quote:
I’m aware, but it means nothing if the crew doesn’t update their setting
Thanks. Was about to post the same. Not sure why the downposts.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 6:12 pm to RedFoxx
quote:
ATC isn’t there to hold their hand.
In that particular location and situation maybe they should be. And i know it’s not completely possible but the helo was showing 300 feet well before then and they have a responsibility for the CRJ as well.
They have to anticipate things can get a little tight there and if it’s even a little tight then order the helo to hold. Especially if what you’re seeing could end up moving too fast for you to process and the readouts available to you may be far off from what’s actually happening.
Again, that helo didn’t wait till that point to move to 300 feet. And just because they may have been allowing the helos to visually separate in those circumstances before without incident doesn’t mean it’s wise to. I bet it’s more unusual than not.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 6:19 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
That post on its own doesn't make you a terrible person, your entire posting history makes you a terrible person. You have long proven his assessment of you to be accurate. I'll throw in 'scum', 'troll', 'incel', 'attention whore', and 'self-loathing homosexual.'
The negative reaction to your post might possibly be due to your implication that the scale of loss, in your opinion, is based upon the attractiveness of the deceased. An immature, emotionally stunted, and callous opinion to hold, much less express publicly. But completely on-brand for you, due to your lack of social intelligence and previously highlighted status as human garbage.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 6:28 pm to WestSideTiger
And you would be wrong. Visual separation has been used in that scenario thousands of times.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 6:34 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
While everyone spent 3 days speculating and theorizing about why the name wasn’t released, they all forgot that real human people are all involved in this tragedy.
No one did this. The other soldiers and many of the passengers and crew had their names released along with a little bit about them.
I have never heard of a name being withheld after family was notified. The army created the speculation and theorizing.
I also think the family did it to delete her social media accounts, but that story may have changed today as I haven’t been able to pay attention today. Allegedly as soon as family gave the OK all were gone but LinkedIn which seemed to not have been used in past several years. It got taken down as soon as someone found it and posted it to social media.
If it is still a true account of family’s actions I don’t have a problem with her family wanting to remove or clean up her social media and any other online presence they can access, but I think all families of real human beings involved in tragedies should be given that option.
EDIT: Davis Winkie was a huge Tim Walz defender, and a critic of Texas using its national guard to defend its border with Mexico due to Biden not doing it. Not sure he is best source of information on anyone.
This post was edited on 2/2/25 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 2/2/25 at 6:37 pm to m57
And this was a great application of visual separation. So many people keep talking about vertical separation in this incident. 100’ separation from a descending aircraft is a terrible plane. Pass behind traffic was a winning plan. The helo crew failed.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 6:56 pm to 257WBY
At the very least and relatively speaking, if a plane is cleared for 20,000 ft and is observed at 30,000 you think they wouldn’t hear about it? Before requesting VFR.
Posted on 2/2/25 at 7:00 pm to 257WBY
quote:
The helo crew failed.
Probably.
I was there more than two dozen times. Wasn't me.
Coulda been.
Popular
Back to top



1



