Started By
Message

Per a peer-reviewed study, "Horse paste" (Ivermectin) reduced CV19 mortality rate by 70%

Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:10 am
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167405 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:10 am
quote:

Background: Ivermectin has demonstrated different mechanisms of action that potentially protect from both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and COVID-19-related comorbidities. Based on the studies suggesting efficacy in prophylaxis combined with the known safety profile of ivermectin, a citywide prevention program using ivermectin for COVID-19 was implemented in Itajaí, a southern city in Brazil in the state of Santa Catarina. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of regular ivermectin use on subsequent COVID-19 infection and mortality rates.


quote:

Results

A detailed description of the data considered for the present analysis is illustrated in Figure 1. Of the 220,517 citizens of Itajaí without COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, 159,561 were above 18 years old. Of the 159,561 citizens above 18 years old without COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, 113,845 (71.3% of the population above 18 years old) received ivermectin before being infected by COVID-19. A total of 45,716 citizens (28.7%) did not receive or did not want to receive ivermectin during the program, including as a prophylactic or as a treatment after having COVID-19.




quote:

As described in Table 2, after employing PSM, of the 6,068 subjects (3,034 in each group), there were 44 hospitalizations among ivermectin users (1.6% hospitalization rate) and 99 hospitalizations (3.3% hospitalization rate) among ivermectin non-users, a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63). When adjustment for variables was employed, the reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 023-0.66; p < 0.0001).


quote:

There were 25 deaths among ivermectin users (0.8% mortality rate) and 79 deaths among non-ivermectin users (2.6% mortality rate), a 68% reduction in mortality rate (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49). When PSM was adjusted, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46; p < 0.0001).




Study
This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 8:14 am
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
29386 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:12 am to
I look for the 270 “scientists” to come out and discredit this as misinformation and should be scrubbed from the media like the hunter Biden laptop story

Posted by LSUJML
BR
Member since May 2008
45751 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:13 am to
One study isn’t enough

Just wear your 3 masks & take a shot every 6 months & maybe in 2 weeks we can flatten the curve
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62833 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:15 am to
This will be near the top of the priority list for the new CNN "misinformation" team.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124410 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:17 am to
New! (And under patent) from Pfizer!

It’s ZORSE PASTE!

Definitely not the same!

This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 8:18 am
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167405 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:19 am to
All jokes aside, I wonder how many lives were lost because they lied about Ivermectin
This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 8:20 am
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78030 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:23 am to
Not possible the MSM said so.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124410 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:23 am to
Lives!? How can you think about lives at a time like this when big-pharma’s profit shares might not go up quite as much! What kind of monster are you!
Posted by Cajunhawk81
Member since Jan 2021
2511 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:25 am to
quote:

All jokes aside, I wonder how many lives were lost because they lied about Ivermectin


Left to die. So many people. Blood should be flowing in the streets for this. Instead...we make statues of Nurses. (This chance at deep reflection was brought to you by Pfizer. Pfizer...for when you just can't bring yourself to care.)
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167405 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:26 am to
There is someone seriously downvoting posts in a thread about an effective cheap medicine that can save lives. No doubt someone that is triple jabbed.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119332 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:28 am to
I think we all knew horse pills worked, it's why Fauci said not to take them. You lose control if people don't die.
Posted by JFT96
Member since Dec 2021
672 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:29 am to
These doctors are all Brazilian....

How about just get the damn shot and not have to rely on horse paste to save your life while you are laying there dying?
Posted by waiting4saturday
Covington, LA
Member since Sep 2005
9735 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Per a peer-reviewed study, "Horse paste" (Ivermectin) reduced CV19 mortality rate by 70%
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:30 am to
I thought less than 1 percent of people were dying. The math doesn't add up of you put all of them in the same bucket. Survival rate would be 98.3 percent.
This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 8:31 am
Posted by waiting4saturday
Covington, LA
Member since Sep 2005
9735 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:31 am to
quote:

No doubt someone that is triple jabbed.



and double masks.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167405 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:31 am to
quote:

How about just get the damn shot and not have to rely on horse paste to save your life while you are laying there dying?




How about we allow people to have a choice of if they want the shot for which we are still discovering the severity of random side effects or a Nobel prize-winning medication that has been in use for decades and has virtually zero side effects?

This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 8:32 am
Posted by LoneStar23
USA
Member since Aug 2019
5195 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:46 am to
quote:

I think we all knew horse pills worked, it's why Fauci said not to take them. You lose control if people don't die.


You also lose emergency use authorization if there is an alternative treatment other than “jab up and hide”
Posted by nerd guy
Grapevine
Member since Dec 2008
12718 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:46 am to
For fricks sake. At least pull data from an actual Journal. This is just a pay to publish bullshite.

You know the journal is garbage when they have this statement.

quote:

Cureus does not consider impact factor to be a reliable or useful metric of individual article importance. Cureus is a signer of DORA – the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment – and does not promote the use of journal impact factors. We instead use article-level metrics such as reads, downloads and citations. Cureus also encourages all readers to submit an SIQ (Scholarly Impact Quotient) score for each article. SIQ is our unique post-publication peer review system that assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. The following stats are from the prior six months. Averages are displayed for monthly reads, submission to publication time, and accepted articles published for free.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95794 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:49 am to
If you truly want knowledge, this is the best publication so far on Ivermectin

14 ivermectin studies summarized

quote:

Main results: We found 14 studies with 1678 participants investigating ivermectin compared to no treatment, placebo, or standard of care. No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy. There were nine studies treating participants with moderate COVID-19 in inpatient settings and four treating mild COVID-19 cases in outpatient settings. One study investigated ivermectin for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eight studies had an open-label design, six were double-blind and placebo-controlled. Of the 41 study results contributed by included studies, about one third were at overall high risk of bias. Ivermectin doses and treatment duration varied among included studies. We identified 31 ongoing and 18 studies awaiting classification until publication of results or clarification of inconsistencies. Ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care for inpatient COVID-19 treatment We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care reduces or increases mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 2.51; 2 studies, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and clinical worsening up to day 28 assessed as need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.59; 2 studies, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or need for supplemental oxygen (0 participants required supplemental oxygen; 1 study, 45 participants; very low-certainty evidence), adverse events within 28 days (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.97; 1 study, 152 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and viral clearance at day seven (RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.51 to 6.48; 2 studies, 159 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on clinical improvement up to 28 days (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.35; 1 study; 73 participants; low-certainty evidence) and duration of hospitalization (mean difference (MD) -0.10 days, 95% CI -2.43 to 2.23; 1 study; 45 participants; low-certainty evidence). No study reported quality of life up to 28 days. Ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care for outpatient COVID-19 treatment We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care reduces or increases mortality up to 28 days (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.05; 2 studies, 422 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and clinical worsening up to 14 days assessed as need for IMV (RR 2.97, 95% CI 0.12 to 72.47; 1 study, 398 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or non-IMV or high flow oxygen requirement (0 participants required non-IMV or high flow; 1 study, 398 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo reduces or increases viral clearance at seven days (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 67.06; 1 study, 24 participants; low-certainty evidence). Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on the number of participants with symptoms resolved up to 14 days (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21; 1 study, 398 participants; low-certainty evidence) and adverse events within 28 days (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.05; 2 studies, 422 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reporting duration of symptoms were eligible for primary analysis. No study reported hospital admission or quality of life up to 14 days. Ivermectin compared to no treatment for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection We found one study. Mortality up to 28 days was the only outcome eligible for primary analysis. We are uncertain whether ivermectin reduces or increases mortality compared to no treatment (0 participants died; 1 study, 304 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study reported results for development of COVID-19 symptoms and adverse events up to 14 days that were included in a secondary analysis due to high risk of bias. No study reported SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospital admission, and quality of life up to 14 days.

Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality. Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124410 posts
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:49 am to
quote:

horse paste


They really hit it out of the park when they attached this label to it, even though it’s blisteringly stupid.

This is like calling aspirin “dog medicine” because it can be given to dogs in some instances.

Ivermectin has seen widespread used in multiple species, including humans, for various ailments, because it works.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram