Started By
Message

re: Pentagon is Ending Tuition Benefits to Reservists

Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:06 pm to
The Obama Administration has done more to retard education than any modern presidency.
Posted by CPT Tiger
My own personal Hell
Member since Oct 2009
1363 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:06 pm to
La Army Nat Guard.

MI
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

I have fifteen years, 10 Active(6 army, 4 guard). The level of change that has swept through the Reserve fighting force over the last 15 years is remarkable.



I spent 14 years in the Marine Reserves with a few deployments and have been in the guard for a little over a year. Honestly, the guard is a disappointment. I'm tempted to say they are combat ineffective. Don't get me wrong, they have some wonderful people and most of the soldiers want to be good at their jobs, they want to be motivated, but the leadership just isn't there.

Don't fret though, big plans are in the works to change all that.
Posted by unbeWEAVEable
The Golf Board Godfather
Member since Apr 2010
13637 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

MI


Not the 415th huh?
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
50038 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Some perks should be kept for the active members... Want those? Go active


I don't disagree with this and I was a reservists. The only problem with that is flies against what the modern military wants. The modern military wants more reservists that can be activated rather than actual everyday full time soldiers. Reducing benefits for reservists will only discourage more young men from joining.
Posted by Negative Nomad
Hell
Member since Oct 2011
3173 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:12 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 11:09 am
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

The only problem with that is flies against what the modern military wants. The modern military wants more reservists that can be activated rather than actual everyday full time soldiers.


That's what they say in public but follow the money. When funds start drying up the Active Army takes care of active army first. The Guard is quickly reverting back to what it was in the 90s. It will take innovative leadership in the Guard to keep it an effective fighting force.
Posted by NWarty
Somewhere in the PNW
Member since Sep 2013
2181 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Don't fret though, big plans are in the works to change all that.


Employers are gonna shat their pants when the number of UTAs double causing the ESGR office to double in size :/
This post was edited on 1/2/16 at 1:14 pm
Posted by CPT Tiger
My own personal Hell
Member since Oct 2009
1363 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:14 pm to
I would disagree whole heartedly. Look I am not saying the Guard or reserves does not have issues that need to be fixed, but my years in the Active side taught me the mat they were not without problems. It is what you make of it.

I put my shop through training every weekend. Even if I am not there my Jr officer and Sr NCO has my guidance to run with. My soldiers do not sit around collecting a paycheck and they will be proficient at their tasks.

The problem with reserve/ guard is while I can train my soldiers to be proficient in their tasks, unless you are combat arms you are lacking time and training on a lot of skills that have to be retaught basically in the year leading up to a mobilization. But even with that outstanding obstacle in their way I have seen tons of success stories in my time with the Guard.
Posted by CPT Tiger
My own personal Hell
Member since Oct 2009
1363 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:15 pm to
Did several years with 415th.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
50038 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

When funds start drying up the Active Army takes care of active army first


As they should and it should be like that even when plenty of funds are available. I was in the Army Guard in the 90's and the problem is the Guard isn't ready to go at a moments notice. It often takes months to get a Guard unit ready to be activated.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138855 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

REAP represented a little more than 1 percent of VA education payouts in fiscal 2014.


This is a non-story, but let us keep up any faux outrage
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135363 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

leaving only a four-year window for current participants to finish their degree programs.
Posted by CPT Tiger
My own personal Hell
Member since Oct 2009
1363 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:21 pm to
The Guard is not meant to be ready at a moments notice. Their deployments are planned in cycles so that proper training can be conducted.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64691 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:22 pm to
I'm confused, isn't this just taking away the GI Bill? Or revising it drastically? I know there are plenty of children of military members who are reaping the benefits of their parents' participation in the military.
Posted by prince of fools
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
1130 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

When funds start drying up the Active Army takes care of active army first


The reserve unit I was in was slated to be ready for deployments EVERY OTHER YEAR. That's pretty much unheard of. Despite that, we were given almost no money for the necessary schools that our guys had to go to in order to get the unit ready for deployments. Ridiculous.
Posted by sullivanct19a
Florida
Member since Oct 2015
5239 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

chryso


The new leader for Dumbest of 2016.

Congrats. Keep it going.
Posted by unbeWEAVEable
The Golf Board Godfather
Member since Apr 2010
13637 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:23 pm to
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13734 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:24 pm to
During our decade long war in the Middle East a lot of Reserve units were deployed more than once.

Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/2/16 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I put my shop through training every weekend. Even if I am not there my Jr officer and Sr NCO has my guidance to run with. My soldiers do not sit around collecting a paycheck and they will be proficient at their tasks.


Good for you. We need more men like you in the guard.

quote:

The problem with reserve/ guard is while I can train my soldiers to be proficient in their tasks, unless you are combat arms you are lacking time and training on a lot of skills that have to be retaught basically in the year leading up to a mobilization.


I'm combat arms and there is certainly not enough training time to be proficient in that skill set.

Actually, there is time but it isn't utilized properly.

quote:

But even with that outstanding obstacle in their way I have seen tons of success stories in my time with the Guard.



Of course there are. But we should always strive to be better.
This post was edited on 1/2/16 at 1:27 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram