- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Penises evolved to be big due to the sexual preferences of females....
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:15 pm to Cell of Awareness
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:15 pm to Cell of Awareness
0
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:17 pm to Cell of Awareness
quote:
The team had set out to determine why, relative to our body size, the human penis is disproportionately thick and long compared to other great apes, when it’s primary function is to “transfer sperm.”
Human pair bonding is strengthened by sex…sex for pleasure…woman have no blatant outward signs of being in at the fertile stage of their cycle…
Behavior, mating systems, and selection have all driven this.
Next they are going to tell us about how human male testicle size is larger than it should be, relative to body size, for a mostly monogamous species…
But the obvious “truth” here is that size really doesn’t “matter” and other traits are more or as important, otherwise average would be larger and the “tails” of the curve would be shorter.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:17 pm to Cell of Awareness
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:21 pm to Cell of Awareness
Women have evolved to find bigger bank accounts more attractive.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:22 pm to X123F45
quote:
A slightly heavy woman is a sign of fertility and had been until the 1920s
Definitely depends on the time and culture, but there’s a reason why men see the “hourglass figure” as attractive. The appropriate bust/shoulder to waist to hip ratio is the sign of fertility.
Being “slightly heavy” probably meant more along the lines of being “rich” and eating well, which meant overall better child survival at birth rather than necessarily a higher fecundity.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:25 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Penis size comes down to genetics and not evolution
Oh, didn’t realize these were mutually exclusive.
Hint: Genetics evolve.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:37 pm to Auburn80
quote:
Women have evolved to find bigger bank accounts more attractive
This alone is not a bad thing. The ability of a mating partner to provide and thrive is a desirable trait. When that is the ONLY trait that is considered things start to get shaky.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:39 pm to Penrod
quote:
Hint: Genetics evolve.
Where's the proof on this?
Evolution is so precise with everything else, yet evolution only saw fit to endow a limited number of men with big dicks to impress women with?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:39 pm to Lou
quote:
"Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses."
- Ezekiel 23:19-20 (571 BC)
Oh, my. Well, guess we need to ban that from the library.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:39 pm to Cell of Awareness
Our dicks didn't evolve because bigger is what women preferred.
They evolved because bigger was more effective at removing competing sperm and burying your own deep within her guts.
Women just evolved to like the growth.
They evolved because bigger was more effective at removing competing sperm and burying your own deep within her guts.
Women just evolved to like the growth.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:44 pm to Cell of Awareness
quote:
whose emission was like that of horses
How would one know this?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:44 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Evolution is so precise with everything else, yet evolution only saw fit to endow a limited number of men with big dicks to impress women with?
Well, women would not think they were big if every man had the same size.
Also, there are other features that attract women and are not democratically shared - height, for example.
Blue Footed Boobies get babes by having the bluest feet. Why didn’t evolution give them equally blue feet?
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:53 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
They evolved because bigger was more effective at removing competing sperm and burying your own deep within her guts.
no, that would explain the shape of the glans of the penis, which acts as a sort of crude shovel, but not the overall size...
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:58 pm to chRxis
quote:
no, that would explain the shape of the glans of the penis, which acts as a sort of crude shovel, but not the overall size...
As I said, bigger is more effective at burying it deep where another shovel can't scoop it out.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:59 pm to Cell of Awareness
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:00 pm to TheBob
Fabulous listen
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:03 pm to Cell of Awareness
When did this joint fully convert to an Aggie board?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:05 pm to Cell of Awareness
Absolute dumbest article I’ve ever read. If large penises were an evolutionary trait, every guy would have one due to natural selection. Penis size is entirely genetic and no amount of medical treatments can change that.
You want to get bitches? Attain a large bank account. Simple as that.
You want to get bitches? Attain a large bank account. Simple as that.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:09 pm to Lou
quote:
Ezekiel 23:19-20
Who knew the Bible had Penthouse Forum material.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:10 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Evolution is so precise with everything else, yet evolution only saw fit to endow a limited number of men with big dicks to impress women with?
What? I think you could look at 10 people and find examples of differing aspects of evolution within each.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News