- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:34 pm to SG_Geaux
I told you baws about how many coal-fired power plants they put online. Usually one every 5 days. We're wasting time and money trying to save the planet. Who are the idiots now?
Adding India and China together, there are supposed to be around 450 coal plants being built this year
Adding India and China together, there are supposed to be around 450 coal plants being built this year
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:37 pm to troyt37
Look, it's far more profitable to work with industry than to try and enforce regulations and make money off of control devices.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:38 pm to SG_Geaux
Only been to Beijing once (2007). I kept blowing dirty snot and blood out of my nose for 2 days after I got out of that shite-hole.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:48 pm to SG_Geaux
And people think environmental regulations are terrible. What's terrible is breathing air like that.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:56 pm to SG_Geaux
I hope all that smog doesn't stunt their growth.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:58 pm to TheIndulger
quote:
And people think environmental regulations are terrible. What's terrible is breathing air like that.
Who are these "people" you speak of? "People" are quite happy that there are air quality regulations.
It's just that smart people see a difference between air pollution and carbon dioxide.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:01 pm to TigerFanatic99
A poliboard reminder, Barry got not ONE concession from China on pollution in the last "climate" treaty.
Zero.
Zero.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:02 pm to TheIndulger
quote:
And people think environmental regulations are terrible. What's terrible is breathing air like that.
What's sad is that people will down vote you because environmental concerns have become a partisan issue.
Instead of scoffing at various forms of environmental controls, they should be promoting balance between economic viability and environmental protection. These issues are not simply about tree hugging and saving the whales, there are large human health implications that surround unregulated pollution.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:03 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:
Who are these "people" you speak of? "People" are quite happy that there are air quality regulations.
Do I need to show you where the poli board is?
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:06 pm to Bmath
If you say so. I say it is far more profitable to shut down your almost clean US factory, and open one up in China or Mexico where nobody gives a shite.
Depending on your size, you can spend thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, or billions of dollars to comply with all the rules, regulations, and edicts, and still have the government and all of it's agencies up the arse of your mostly clean business, in a never-ending struggle to remain profitable.
Not sure why anyone would begin to argue the point, knowing that much of what you buy is made in China. It isn't by accident. Actions have consequences.
I understand that it is difficult for idealists to wrap their heads around the concept that using the force of government to enact laws that sound so lofty and wonderful, can actually be disastrous.
Depending on your size, you can spend thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, or billions of dollars to comply with all the rules, regulations, and edicts, and still have the government and all of it's agencies up the arse of your mostly clean business, in a never-ending struggle to remain profitable.
Not sure why anyone would begin to argue the point, knowing that much of what you buy is made in China. It isn't by accident. Actions have consequences.
I understand that it is difficult for idealists to wrap their heads around the concept that using the force of government to enact laws that sound so lofty and wonderful, can actually be disastrous.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:18 pm to troyt37
quote:The cost of labor is a huge factor in all of this as well. You won't see a union bring down a company in China like it did the US auto market a few years ago.
If you say so. I say it is far more profitable to shut down your almost clean US factory, and open one up in China or Mexico where nobody gives a shite.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:22 pm to troyt37
quote:
I understand that it is difficult for idealists to wrap their heads around the concept that using the force of government to enact laws that sound so lofty and wonderful, can actually be disastrous.
Ok then, if China and Mexico had strict regs like the U.S., then it wouldn't incentivize companies to manufacture there instead.
Obviously this will result in more expensive goods.. So be it I say. People would rather buy 5 cheap Chinese made piece of shite items that break all the time than 1 high quality expensive American made thing that will last for years. All the while this cheap consumerism is making parts of the world unlivable.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:40 pm to GeauxColonels
Doesn't look any worse than it did 7 years ago.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:55 pm to troyt37
quote:
difficult for idealists to wrap their heads around the concept that using the force of government to enact laws that sound so lofty and wonderful, can actually be disastrous.
You bring up some decent points, but many environmental laws have been rolled out in phases. The idea being to not strangle the life out of industry. It allows pollution to be reduced incrementally, while allowing for costs and technology to catch up over time.
The real prohibitive costs you are talking about comes from years and even decades of ignoring regulations. The facilities then have to do a costly overhaul all at once.
I'm not an idealist, I just worked in the consulting industry for many years. Therefore I can tell you that you are incorrect about a lot as well. For example, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality sent the EPA a giant "FU" letter several years ago when the Quad O rules rolled out. Many state agencies struggle to balance industry needs while meeting environmental regulations.
Furthermore, for every environmental lobbyist there is one for O&G and other businesses. Plenty of proposed laws go up for debate only to be shot down or heavily amended.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:18 pm to Bmath
quote:There in lies the problem
balance between economic viability and environmental protection
Eta: The automotive/equipment industry regulations and ethanol gas were ridiculous. The plant pollution stuff was okay, but the costs of overhaul delayed a lot of small stuff until it became one big cost
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:20 pm to Bmath
quote:
What's sad is that people will down vote you because environmental concerns have become a partisan issue.
They've never been. How we deal with them is the partisan issue.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:22 pm to htownjeep
quote:
The cost of labor is a huge factor in all of this as well. You won't see a union bring down a company in China like it did the US auto market a few years ago.
Agree. Taking that into consideration, unless your ultimate goal is to export all manufacturing to the most polluting and cheapest countries worldwide, you rein in the government agencies suffocating mostly clean US businesses with incredibly expensive rules and regulations, taking in to account that the US businesses are most likely 1000 times cleaner than the Chinese or Mexico counterparts you would be chasing the business toward. Neither that, nor reductions in trade are used to force the biggest polluters to clean up. The result is what we see happening around us. We are sending our economic power to China and Mexico.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:26 pm to SG_Geaux
I don't agree withy over regulation, but what's wrong with having clean air and water? I'm willing to pay for that.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:28 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:
Chairman Mao doesn't care about student protests at American universities.
The Chinese don't even thing most Chinese lives matter.
Popular
Back to top



1








