Started By
Message

re: Parts of Beijing shut down due to smog

Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:33 pm to
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14688 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:33 pm to
Straw man?

Tell you what. You open a rubber dog shite factory anywhere in the US, I'll open one in China. Let's see who goes broke first.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:34 pm to
I told you baws about how many coal-fired power plants they put online. Usually one every 5 days. We're wasting time and money trying to save the planet. Who are the idiots now?

Adding India and China together, there are supposed to be around 450 coal plants being built this year
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 2:36 pm
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18921 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:37 pm to
Look, it's far more profitable to work with industry than to try and enforce regulations and make money off of control devices.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
22488 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:38 pm to
Only been to Beijing once (2007). I kept blowing dirty snot and blood out of my nose for 2 days after I got out of that shite-hole.
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19448 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:48 pm to
And people think environmental regulations are terrible. What's terrible is breathing air like that.
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
16021 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:56 pm to
I hope all that smog doesn't stunt their growth.
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
21962 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

And people think environmental regulations are terrible. What's terrible is breathing air like that.



Who are these "people" you speak of? "People" are quite happy that there are air quality regulations.

It's just that smart people see a difference between air pollution and carbon dioxide.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52640 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:01 pm to
A poliboard reminder, Barry got not ONE concession from China on pollution in the last "climate" treaty.


Zero.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18921 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

And people think environmental regulations are terrible. What's terrible is breathing air like that.


What's sad is that people will down vote you because environmental concerns have become a partisan issue.

Instead of scoffing at various forms of environmental controls, they should be promoting balance between economic viability and environmental protection. These issues are not simply about tree hugging and saving the whales, there are large human health implications that surround unregulated pollution.
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19448 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:03 pm to
quote:



Who are these "people" you speak of? "People" are quite happy that there are air quality regulations.




Do I need to show you where the poli board is?
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14688 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:06 pm to
If you say so. I say it is far more profitable to shut down your almost clean US factory, and open one up in China or Mexico where nobody gives a shite.

Depending on your size, you can spend thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, or billions of dollars to comply with all the rules, regulations, and edicts, and still have the government and all of it's agencies up the arse of your mostly clean business, in a never-ending struggle to remain profitable.

Not sure why anyone would begin to argue the point, knowing that much of what you buy is made in China. It isn't by accident. Actions have consequences.

I understand that it is difficult for idealists to wrap their heads around the concept that using the force of government to enact laws that sound so lofty and wonderful, can actually be disastrous.
Posted by htownjeep
Republic of Texas
Member since Jun 2005
7832 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

If you say so. I say it is far more profitable to shut down your almost clean US factory, and open one up in China or Mexico where nobody gives a shite.
The cost of labor is a huge factor in all of this as well. You won't see a union bring down a company in China like it did the US auto market a few years ago.
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19448 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:22 pm to
quote:


I understand that it is difficult for idealists to wrap their heads around the concept that using the force of government to enact laws that sound so lofty and wonderful, can actually be disastrous.



Ok then, if China and Mexico had strict regs like the U.S., then it wouldn't incentivize companies to manufacture there instead.

Obviously this will result in more expensive goods.. So be it I say. People would rather buy 5 cheap Chinese made piece of shite items that break all the time than 1 high quality expensive American made thing that will last for years. All the while this cheap consumerism is making parts of the world unlivable.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:40 pm to
Doesn't look any worse than it did 7 years ago.

Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18921 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

difficult for idealists to wrap their heads around the concept that using the force of government to enact laws that sound so lofty and wonderful, can actually be disastrous.


You bring up some decent points, but many environmental laws have been rolled out in phases. The idea being to not strangle the life out of industry. It allows pollution to be reduced incrementally, while allowing for costs and technology to catch up over time.

The real prohibitive costs you are talking about comes from years and even decades of ignoring regulations. The facilities then have to do a costly overhaul all at once.

I'm not an idealist, I just worked in the consulting industry for many years. Therefore I can tell you that you are incorrect about a lot as well. For example, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality sent the EPA a giant "FU" letter several years ago when the Quad O rules rolled out. Many state agencies struggle to balance industry needs while meeting environmental regulations.

Furthermore, for every environmental lobbyist there is one for O&G and other businesses. Plenty of proposed laws go up for debate only to be shot down or heavily amended.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

balance between economic viability and environmental protection
There in lies the problem

Eta: The automotive/equipment industry regulations and ethanol gas were ridiculous. The plant pollution stuff was okay, but the costs of overhaul delayed a lot of small stuff until it became one big cost
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 4:26 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:20 pm to
quote:


What's sad is that people will down vote you because environmental concerns have become a partisan issue.


They've never been. How we deal with them is the partisan issue.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14688 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

The cost of labor is a huge factor in all of this as well. You won't see a union bring down a company in China like it did the US auto market a few years ago.


Agree. Taking that into consideration, unless your ultimate goal is to export all manufacturing to the most polluting and cheapest countries worldwide, you rein in the government agencies suffocating mostly clean US businesses with incredibly expensive rules and regulations, taking in to account that the US businesses are most likely 1000 times cleaner than the Chinese or Mexico counterparts you would be chasing the business toward. Neither that, nor reductions in trade are used to force the biggest polluters to clean up. The result is what we see happening around us. We are sending our economic power to China and Mexico.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:26 pm to
I don't agree withy over regulation, but what's wrong with having clean air and water? I'm willing to pay for that.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
110709 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Chairman Mao doesn't care about student protests at American universities.


The Chinese don't even thing most Chinese lives matter.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram