- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Owner of Triple S convenience store files suit against BRPD, city
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:18 pm to ForeverLSU02
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:18 pm to ForeverLSU02
I would sue whoever painted that big stupid mural right next to the 8 piece fried chicken for $4.99 sign.
0
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:20 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Gonna be great for his business to have the entire BRPD fricking hate him
Robbery? What robbery?
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:20 pm to Pax Regis
quote:I saw a sign advertising this ar the ghetto station north ing the college drive exit. wanting to buy best buy, amazon, chilis gift cards.
They also need to look at whether he is doing SNAP fraud - buying credits for cash
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:23 pm to terd ferguson
quote:seems like a sound tribute to his good buddy Alton
That's a public exposure charge... send him to jail and make him register as a sex offender.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:24 pm to ForeverLSU02
If what he reported is true, he should have taken the violation of his rights and shut up. Murica!
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:24 pm to ForeverLSU02
I predict 60-90 min wait for BRPD next time he calls 911 for emergency services.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:27 pm to ForeverLSU02
If this dude would play his cards right, he could have Triple S Marts in 'hoods all over the country.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:28 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
wanting to buy best buy, amazon, chilis gift cards.
What's illegal about that? Foodstamps, yeah but that aint food stamps.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:28 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Meh, if you are 10 ft away from a fatality, you can pretty much assume that you will be detained, questioned and have to write witness reports for what you saw. This is SOP. If he didn't want to be hassled that night, perhaps he should have minded his own business, literally.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:28 pm to ForeverLSU02
The dude is shady at best no doubt. I know this as fact from my younger days of doing drugs. He had other things going on as some have suspected. TIFWIW.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:29 pm to Box Geauxrilla
quote:
you can pretty much assume that you will be detained, questioned and have to write witness reports for what you saw. This is SOP. If he didn't want to be hassled that night, perhaps he should have minded his own business, literally.
He is claiming that more than that happened.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:30 pm to ForeverLSU02
I don't trust a single thing this guys says about the case
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:32 pm to Mo Jeaux
Hasn't his story changed a few times? Id say chances are he is lying again. He just doesn't want the out of towners to get the locals to burn his store down. I'm laugh when they investigate him and all his shite is out on the table.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:32 pm to ForeverLSU02
They detained him for 4 hours so they had time to get and execute the warrant. Which they apparently did at 5:00 am according to the other thread related to the warrant. What's the problem again?
Also, if they confiscated his phone, how the hell did he share the video with the media?
Also, if they confiscated his phone, how the hell did he share the video with the media?
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:33 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
Hasn't his story changed a few times? Id say chances are he is lying again.
I don't know, but this is what his law suit is claiming.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:34 pm to ForeverLSU02
quote:
Baton Rouge Police officers quickly took his store's surveillance video and his cell phone
quote:
suit claims Lt. Robert Cook and Officer Timothy Ballard also took his cellphone, which had video footage of the 37-year-old's fatal altercation with police, before they put Muhlafi in the back of a police car for four hours. The suit stated he was only released to use the restroom.
Um
What are the merits of this law suit?
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:34 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
quote:
They detained him for 4 hours so they had time to get and execute the warrant.
Is that how it works? Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:35 pm to chalupa
quote:
What's illegal about that? Foodstamps, yeah but that aint food stamps.
What you are saying literally true, but that's also a subtle way of advertising the offer to purchase SNAP credits also. Trust me on this.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:38 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
They detained him for 4 hours so they had time to get and execute the warrant.
Is that how it works?
Actually, you may detain a Material Witness in order to obtain their statement. In fact, a Material Witness may be arrested if they refuse to cooperate with a court order/subpoena.
Furthermore, persons may be excluded from a crime scene (including a business or their own home) while a warrant is being obtained.
All of this is black letter law.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:39 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Is that how it works?
I guess the alternative would be allowing him to destroy evidence
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News