Started By
Message

re: Over employed - learned this term on Reddit

Posted on 8/8/25 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
68745 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

I don't think anyone disagrees with you on this particular point.


One side in here is arguing in defense of this act using the best case scenario to prove that it's good.

The other side is telling that side what is happening in real life. Anyone who has seen this in reality and not just read about it conceptually knows the typical perpetrator of this scam. They aren't all stars, and they rarely try to even pretend to be.
Posted by Artificial Ignorance
Member since Feb 2025
1424 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

It's ok to admit you're jealous of them, I know I am.


I WFH. I have so since 2010.

I am jealous of me sometimes.

Dat ain’t near my point of the post. I have approximately 100 people who report to me across the world, many of whom also WFH.

We occasionally have a couple go MIA in their work. I have had less than 10% who have that we performance manage up or out.

I care about delivery. Less so about when the work gets done, more so about how and creating interdependencies to get greater value together, but all must deliver. By MIA, they are not delivering. One is an influencer. Cheating me. I give plenty of space and support to help my people get set for success. Just deliver. I don’t take kind to cheaters. Influencer now on performance improvement plan that if falls short I will have them exit the company.

The over employed sub Reddit was thematically about cheating and deceiving their multiple full time employers to enjoy the full time benefits while delivering part time effort to each.

Shamelessly lying and cheating should be crushed.
This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 3:26 pm
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33064 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:18 pm to
I worked two jobs for around 20 of the 30 years I lived in Dallas. I had a real job and a fun job. My fun job really didn't negatively affect my real job.

Real job: Selling advertising.
Fun job: Working Mavericks games.

During the playoffs, I'd take a few days off from the real job. I usually only worked half days on Fridays anyway.

The company I worked for had other ad sales reps that worked for more than one advertising entity. That wasn't cool at all. One guy, who worked with me, sold advertising for a Hispanic publication. He called on a furniture store that ran ads with me.I ratted him out to our manager. He was fired.

Another ad rep was sitting on a used car lot selling cars while he was supposed to be calling on prospective, or current customers. He was also fired.

I used to get offers from business owners that wanted me to sell direct mail advertising. One was a lady who ran a remodeling contractor business. She had figured out how many other businesses she needed for it to cost her nothing, and wanted me to sell the other ads for her. She invited me to lunch at her house when she proposed the idea. I declined the offer.

ETA: As long as sales reps were making their goals my company didn't micromanage us. It would have been easy to double dip on their time. I have always taken pride in being honest with people. I worked for the same place for 28 years.
This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 3:27 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85246 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

You’re missing my point, there are instances where it is illegal (IE billing a client for time not worked), but in general it is not “illegal”. Can you be fired for it? Absolutely, but that doesn’t mean it’s illegal.



Theft and fraud are illegal.


I don’t know how else to spell it out for you.


Let’s reverse the scenario using your logic.


The employer engaged in wage theft and time card manipulation of its employees. You are saying that’s perfectly fine. There should be no recourse for the employees.

Except for just quit.









This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 3:32 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36179 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

He called on a furniture store that ran ads with me.I ratted him out to our manager. He was fired.

What a rat
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36179 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Theft and fraud are illegal.

If you are a salaried employee and you don't have to clock in and out in order to be paid, it is not "illegal" for you to not work a full 40 hours in a week.

You were literally showed a supreme court ruling that stated that if you are in Louisiana, it is not illegal.

Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36179 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

The employer engaged in wage theft and time card manipulation of its employees. You are saying that’s perfectly fine. There should be no recourse for the employees.

No, that's in violation of the FLSA.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85246 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

If you are a salaried employee and you don't have to clock in and out in order to be paid, it is not "illegal" for you to not work a full 40 hours in a week. You were literally showed a supreme court ruling that stated that if you are in Louisiana, it is not illegal.




Diff states have different laws, thanks for pointing that out.



Also, this isn't what we are talking about.


I don’t think anyone claimed you working 38 hours instead of 40 at your salaried job is illegal.


It’s that you claimed to work 38 hours at 3 different jobs. You didn’t.


And so in the reverse as your employer I pay you for 20 when you really worked 38. And you will just take it because that’s not illegal.

















This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 3:44 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36179 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

It’s that you claimed to work 38 hours at 3 different jobs. You didn’t.

If you aren't punching in and out in order to be paid, you aren't claiming that you worked any hours. You're being paid a salary and work is being performed for that salary.

So you agree that not working for a full 40 hours isn't illegal, but it's what you do with the hours that you aren't working for that first job that makes it illegal?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170316 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

F I can get all the work done for my job and then do the same with another one, what’s the issue? Is the job being done?

From a practical standpoint the employers really shouldn't care. But people get their feelings hurt about work.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
31695 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

My buddy does this. He's the top performer at both of his jobs. Cyber security



i'm in cybersecurity and I could partially pull this off. Only thing that would get me is when I travel for installs.

There are a few guys I know that work for top 5 CyberSecurity companies that do 2-3 jobs on top of their primary. I had lunch with a dude who works for CrowdStrike who probably clears 200k on his side jobs on top of whatever CS pays him.

He's brilliant, but also a narcissistic a-hole. I couldn't do it.
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
1944 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Pretty easy to filter if you just ask for references from prior employers


Unfortunately, I would imagine this is a lost "art" in the hiring process since most HR departments now tell managers not to give references and only verify dates of employment.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40012 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

It’s that you claimed to work 38 hours at 3 different jobs. You didn’t.




But who is actually claiming that here? If you're a salaried employee who completes all their tasks for the week in 10 hours time and then sits on their arse without telling anyone that you're short on work, that doesn't mean you claimed to work 40 hours.

It's not yet illegal to be a "do the bare minimum to not get fired" employee.
This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 3:53 pm
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
9596 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

This isn't happening. People are not performing their work well for any of them. They know they'll be fired eventually. This isn't working multiple jobs to make ends meet. It's lying to organizations and essentially stealing from them.


Posted by jamiegla1
Member since Aug 2016
7871 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:57 pm to
This sounds tempting. Even if I could pull it off for a year or two
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
12871 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

There are a few guys I know that work for top 5 CyberSecurity companies that do 2-3 jobs on top of their primary.

I've been a consultant in the same field for 20 years. I'm almost never working on just one client at once, which is almost like having multiple employers. There are always delays in document production (if I send out a request at the beginning of the project, eight different people at the client are going to take at least a week to get something back to me, etc.) I have to work with external auditors who are also working for multiple clients, etc.

It's not much different than working for multiple employers. People are so...f'ing... slow, it gives you plenty of time for other stuff.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
9596 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

It's not yet illegal to be a "do the bare minimum to not get fired" employee.


I used to work with a lady who was really damn good at her job. She moved onto another department and I hadn't though about her for probably a decade until a few months ago when I was invited to be part of an interview panel for a job she applied for.

Mind you, she's still an all-star employee in my book back from when I knew her. Went into the interview thinking she'd be a shoe-in. Right before the interview, I learned she'd been let go from our company years back.

Interview ends, I still tell the panel to hire her.

Two days later I find out she wasn't just "let go", she was fired for being caught doing 2 jobs. Which helped to explain why a formerly great employee became a consistent underperformer. So bad that her boss started snooping around suspecting she was moonlighting, only to be proven right.

Her offer was rescinded.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12154 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

I don't have a "contract" either, but we have an employee handbook with written company policy, like I'd imagine most companies the size of mine would have. My time being exclusive to them is certainly outlined in that handbook.
As someone who has litigated that clause in many employee handbooks, most are not that explicit.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12154 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

It's 100% payroll fraud even if you're a salaried employee.
Explain how so, in legal terms. Cite "payroll fraud" court opinions in support.
This post was edited on 8/11/25 at 4:43 pm
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 11Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram