- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:20 pm to Schmelly
Vehicle 1 is considered the at fault vehicle in a crash report.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:20 pm to Lake Vegas Tiger
quote:that's the next step. trying not to
LAWYER UP
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:21 pm to Kreweofwayne
quote:see question #3
Vehicle 1 is considered the at fault vehicle in a crash report.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:23 pm to Schmelly
quote:
both were women...HA! smart guy, lol
easy
both at fault
let their own insurance pay for each vehicle
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:23 pm to Schmelly
quote:
nope. video shows a good 6-7 lengths. 25 mph zone. wasn't speeding either
if car #2 was 6-7 car lengths behind, how did they collide? Are we talking about one of those short turn lanes or long ones?
its kind of hard to tell with out visuals.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:24 pm to Schmelly
#1
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:25 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
if car #2 was 6-7 car lengths behind, how did they collide? Are we talking about one of those short turn lanes or long ones?
its kind of hard to tell with out visuals.
This. At least scan and post the police sketch `of the scene from the accident report, so we have some idea.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:26 pm to NYCAuburn
because #1 got over into the turning lane so she kept forward without slowing down. when the car made the turn, it was too late. they didn't hit hard and nearly didn't. but they did
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:26 pm to Schmelly
Why would I veer left to take a right turn?...
This post was edited on 2/25/16 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:27 pm to Evolved Simian
quote:only thing they drew was the point of impact
This. At least scan and post the police sketch `of the scene from the accident report, so we have some idea.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:27 pm to Schmelly
Vehicle #2 has established presence in the lane.
Vehicle #1 is in a different lane.
Vehicle #1 turns across Vehicle #2's lane. The two vehicles collide.
The accident would not have occurred had Vehicle #1 stayed in it's lane.
Therefore, Vehicle #1 is at fault.
Vehicle #1 is in a different lane.
Vehicle #1 turns across Vehicle #2's lane. The two vehicles collide.
The accident would not have occurred had Vehicle #1 stayed in it's lane.
Therefore, Vehicle #1 is at fault.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:27 pm to Schmelly
So V1 was ahead of you, left the travel lane and went into the turning lane to the left, then made a sudden right turn across your lane and you t-boned them?
If so, I think you're getting paid Baw.
If so, I think you're getting paid Baw.
This post was edited on 2/25/16 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:27 pm to Tshiz
quote:you wouldn't, but you're prolly a dude
Why would I veer left to take a right turn?...
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:30 pm to 3deadtrolls
quote:
So V1 was ahead of you, left the travel lane and went into the turning lane to the left, then made a sudden right turn across your lane and you t-boned them?
If so, I think you're getting paid Baw.
yep
wouldn't call it t-boned. but yeah, front qtr panel hit #1 in the passenger door and grazed it all up to the front
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:31 pm to SpqrTiger
quote:that's exactly what the police chief said when we talked with him. State farm is trying to see it differently. both drivers have SF
Vehicle #2 has established presence in the lane.
Vehicle #1 is in a different lane.
Vehicle #1 turns across Vehicle #2's lane. The two vehicles collide.
The accident would not have occurred had Vehicle #1 stayed in it's lane.
Therefore, Vehicle #1 is at fault.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:33 pm to Tshiz
quote:
Why would I veer left to take a right turn?...
To keep from slowing down because vehicle two was riding their arse.
Video could implicate both drivers as being at fault.
Would be curious to know about any admissions by the parties involved.
On its face as described, unit 1 guilty of improper lane usage, possible failure to signal lane change or turn.
quote:
that's exactly what the police chief said
Unless he instigated the incident what relevance does his opinion have in this incident?
This post was edited on 2/25/16 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:34 pm to Tshiz
quote:
Why would I veer left to take a right turn?...
I'm still stuck at this one.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:36 pm to Schmelly
So the police report says that driver 1 is at fault and you think the insurance company will try to say differently?
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:37 pm to Five0
quote:6-7 car lengths when driver gets into turn lane. 2-3 when they make the turn
To keep from slowing down because vehicle two was riding their arse.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News