- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oregon passes bill to recriminalize drug possession
Posted on 3/3/24 at 12:30 pm to Jake88
Posted on 3/3/24 at 12:30 pm to Jake88
quote:
Stupid liberals. Who could've guessed the outcome???
The War on Drugs is over; drugs won. Both “conservatives” and “liberals” are responsible for the hellscape that drug prohibition has created.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 1:49 pm to Joshjrn
The war on poverty is much much much worse.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 1:55 pm to YouKnowImRight
quote:
The war on poverty is much much much worse.
I would argue that our current policy of drug prohibition is in large part responsible for much of the generational poverty we are still seeing. If the wealthiest people in your neighborhood are drug dealers, you’re going to have a hard time convincing kids to stay on the straight and narrow so they can have a comfortable middle class life in a couple of decades.
You’ll notice that the number of neighborhoods in which the wealthiest people are bootleggers/moonshiners approach nonexistent.
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 3/3/24 at 2:09 pm to RLDSC FAN
The whole GD “war on drugs” was total bullshite, if there was ever a war on drugs (which I am not sure really existed since the CIA was in charge of the Mexican cartels and working with them in 80s to fund the contras, ((google it about 12 books and 3 or 4 movies on it) then we completely got destroyed and drugs won.
The war on weed never made a bit of sense to begin with. It was like prohibition 80/90s style.
The war on weed never made a bit of sense to begin with. It was like prohibition 80/90s style.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 2:34 pm to RLDSC FAN
Where do they think they are going to find police officers to hire? None want to work for Woke, progressive agenda mayors or city councils.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 4:14 pm to Upperdecker
quote:
Most addicts are a detriment to our society by their own choice
I agree that addicts are a detriment to society.
Addicts chose to abuse drugs and/or alcohol and could choose to pursue treatment, but have yet to do so.
Addiction however is a disease and can be shown to be so scientifically using imaging and other objective measures.
All three statements can be true at the same time.
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 3/3/24 at 4:20 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
The whole GD “war on drugs” was total bullshite,
I agree that we should view drug abuse as a war, it’s killed more Americans that all of our wars combined.
quote:
there was ever a war on drugs (which I am not sure really existed since the CIA was in charge of the Mexican cartels and working with them in 80s to fund the contras, ((google it about 12 books and 3 or 4 movies on it) then we completely got destroyed and drugs won.
If you believe the CIA was complicit in drug trafficking to support foreign wars as the evidence you presented supports then follow that logic to its conclusion.
Drug smugglers are complicit in any deaths that occur as a result of their smuggling.
More Americans have died from addiction than all wars combined.
Therefore the US government would be responsible for more American deaths than the Germans, Nazis, Japanese, Korean/Chinese, Vietnamese and Al-Qaeda combined.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 4:27 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I would argue that our current policy of drug prohibition is in large part responsible for much of the generational poverty we are still seeing.
I’d argue it’s a byproduct of raising children in broken/non-nuclear families.
Two parent households statistically are far and away the greatest predictor of positive/negative outcomes for children and drug use.
Black two parent families for example have better outcomes than white two parent families, there are just proportionally far more single parent black homes than white ones.
Prior to LBJ signing the great society legislation blacks were between 70-80% two parent households. Since that was passed all races have seen a steady decline in outcomes.
Any objective statistician would point to that legislation as the inflection point for the US.
In other words if we want to fix drug abuse and poor child outcomes we need to identify exactly what part of the Great Society legislation triggered the decline and remove it or just eliminate the whole thing all together.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 4:32 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Getting methed out on your couch? Nobody cares.
Unfortunately a lot of people leave their couch to get more or do stupid stuff while high.
Bottom line here, legalization of dangerous drugs is a terrible idea.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 5:58 pm to RLDSC FAN
Has anyone seen the videos of the drugs in the streets from the cities that do this?
Posted on 3/3/24 at 6:42 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
ranked 50th for access to treatment
Well no shite it failed then. That's one thing I can say about Louisiana, we may be last in damned near everything but this state has great recovery and access to it. Whether treatment facilities or sober housing and thriving recovery communities, it's one of the things Louisiana actually does well.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 6:48 pm to RLDSC FAN
So shocked that didn’t work out as intended
Posted on 3/3/24 at 6:48 pm to DavidTheGnome
Louisiana has more people on government assistance than nearly any other state.
You can spin it any way you want; it's a mess.
You can spin it any way you want; it's a mess.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 6:53 pm to N2cars
quote:
Louisiana has more people on government assistance than nearly any other state.
You can spin it any way you want; it's a mess.
Ok? Doesn't change the fact that the state does recovery right
Posted on 3/3/24 at 7:08 pm to RLDSC FAN
Addiction is a disease not a choice. Putting some one in jail for possession is like putting a diabetic in jail for having a dozen doughnuts. Distributing is another subject.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 7:11 pm to Lithium
meth is illegal. krispy kreams are not illegal.
so the two aren't really alike.
so the two aren't really alike.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 7:21 pm to Rebel
They both are bad for you. And putting someone in jail for it doesn’t do anything
Posted on 3/3/24 at 7:22 pm to DavidTheGnome
I don't know, tbh, but it b speaks to the weakness of our populace.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 7:39 pm to YouKnowImRight
quote:
The war on poverty is much much much worse.
It’s an easy fix. Reform and fund the American education system and thus decreases dramatically, IMO
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 7:40 pm
Popular
Back to top



1







