- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: On this day in 1945, the U.S. Marines landed on the island of Iwo Jima...
Posted on 2/19/22 at 10:45 am to RollTide1987
Posted on 2/19/22 at 10:45 am to RollTide1987
Hell on earth. I've never heard that before. Thanks for posting it.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 10:47 am to RollTide1987
quote:
On this day in 1945, the U.S. Marines landed on the island of Iwo Jima...
had an uncle that was there on that day
Posted on 2/19/22 at 10:47 am to RollTide1987
My grandfather was there and when i got older and realized how bad the fighting was there, i can’t believe he made it out alive.
He did get to see the raising of the flag there which i have always thought was incredible.
I did ask how many guys from his company came back and he said there were very few of us still left. Lots of casualties
He did get to see the raising of the flag there which i have always thought was incredible.
I did ask how many guys from his company came back and he said there were very few of us still left. Lots of casualties
Posted on 2/19/22 at 10:52 am to Johngotigers
quote:
the American flag being raised on Mt. Kuribayashi.
uh, son, about that....
jk
Posted on 2/19/22 at 11:33 am to 777Tiger
Every time there is a great thread like this, there is always someone downvoting.
I often wonder if Progressives today would have cheered for the Japanese and Nazis if they were alive back then. JK, I know they would.
I often wonder if Progressives today would have cheered for the Japanese and Nazis if they were alive back then. JK, I know they would.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 11:45 am to The Spleen
quote:
The emergency landings number is highly contested. According to several historians, the majority of B-29 landings there were routine refueling stops.
Even if the were refueling stops, wouldn't that mean that the island greatly increased the bomber's range. Therefore opening up more targets to attack?
Posted on 2/19/22 at 11:48 am to RollTide1987
I had a great-uncle who was at Iwo Jima. He said he spent a grand total of five or six hours in combat before a Jap grenade shredded up his leg with shrapnel. He had a slight limp for the rest of his life but he said he didn’t care because he got to spend the last months of the war chasing nurses in Guam and Hawaii.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 11:59 am to RollTide1987
When I was a young boy, paw paw (a WWII marine) told me he knew some of the men that raised the flag on Iwo Jima. I was too young at the time to appreciate that fact but I’ve never forgotten it.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 12:20 pm to RollTide1987
My Dad was in this battle and this post sent me on a new search for information on his unit. I stumbled upon a website that one of his fellow Marines had created - and it has several photos that include my Dad. Very cool and special- thank you RollTide1987!
Here is link to recently preserved films at the University of South Carolina. There are over 80 films on Iwo Jima. It is searchable by unit for any of you that may be interested.
LINK
Here is link to recently preserved films at the University of South Carolina. There are over 80 films on Iwo Jima. It is searchable by unit for any of you that may be interested.
LINK
Posted on 2/19/22 at 12:28 pm to The Spleen
quote:
And one they ultimately didn’t even need.
A lot of this hindsight should be reserved for Peleliu (a classic example of the USMC's inferiority complex and a pre-Apollo program "Go fever").
Iwo was not a waste. Peleliu was.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:16 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Even if the were refueling stops, wouldn't that mean that the island greatly increased the bomber's range. Therefore opening up more targets to attack?
Not really. The original intent of the invasion was to neutralize Japanese fighter planes, so the B-29’s would no longer need an escort on their bombing missions. We switched to bombing at night, eliminating the need for escort planes. The refueling justification is a retroactive one.
There are some historians out there that consider the battle a failure because it used Marine resources that could have been used in the Okinawa attacks.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:28 pm to RollTide1987
Our neighbor long ago was on Iwo, he and his wife became good friends and like grandparents to our kids.
As a former Marine, I was honored when he showed me his Iwo Jima photo album of mostly barren land that had been shelled to bits and tons of dead Japanese. They kept and trained small dogs to sniff out the enemy in tunnels and underground bunkers. He loved his dogs.
After all that time he still hated the "japs" and I mean really disliked them with a passion. Surprised me a little because otherwise he was a gracious, devoutly religious, humble man and true Southern gentleman.
He died not long after, and his wife said he'd shared his album with me before his own sons had seen it, and only his fellow VFW WW2 buddies before me.
S/F Mr. George.
I still think about you with great fondness and respect 25 years later.
As a former Marine, I was honored when he showed me his Iwo Jima photo album of mostly barren land that had been shelled to bits and tons of dead Japanese. They kept and trained small dogs to sniff out the enemy in tunnels and underground bunkers. He loved his dogs.
After all that time he still hated the "japs" and I mean really disliked them with a passion. Surprised me a little because otherwise he was a gracious, devoutly religious, humble man and true Southern gentleman.
He died not long after, and his wife said he'd shared his album with me before his own sons had seen it, and only his fellow VFW WW2 buddies before me.
S/F Mr. George.
I still think about you with great fondness and respect 25 years later.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:30 pm to The Spleen
quote:
The original intent of the invasion was to neutralize Japanese fighter planes, so the B-29’s would no longer need an escort on their bombing missions.
Incorrect. The original intent of the invasion was to give P-51 fighter escorts a launching pad to escort B-29 bombers to Japan. The first such sortie was made on April 7, 1945, when 119 P-51s took off to escort over 100 B-29 Superforts to the Japanese mainland. At that particular time, the Battle of Okinawa was starting up in earnest and the latter island wouldn't be declared secure until June. P-51s and B-29s had been flying into and out of Iwo Jima on missions to Japan for two whole months prior to Okinawa being secured.
This post was edited on 2/19/22 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:30 pm to RollTide1987
Salute to the greatest generation of men.
Posted on 2/19/22 at 1:32 pm to Mr Breeze
Mr George? Last name or first?
Posted on 2/19/22 at 3:49 pm to Mr Breeze
Had an uncle who fought the Japs throughout the island hopping campaign & according to my cousin, the only thing he ever said about that campaign was how much he hated the Japs. To the extent he never, post war, ever bought anything made in Japan. My cousin, on his dad's death bed at the age of 64, asked him why he hated the Japs so much.His answer was "Iwo Jima.
Posted on 2/20/22 at 7:32 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Stanwood Duval from Houma with the binoculars.
Thanks for the pic Wolfhound.
If you search “ Iwo Jima forward artillery observer” the second image is of him and his crew at the airfield. He has his binoculars up. There is a wrecked aircraft in front of their hole.
Please post it for us.
Posted on 2/20/22 at 8:11 am to SenseiBuddy
quote:
Salute to the greatest generation of men.
The civil war generation fought a far more deadly conflict. You think men were tougher in the 1940’s than the 1860’s? In calling them that you are misrepresenting them. They were ordinary men who were forced, or volunteered, to do some very dirty and dangerous work. That they did it, makes them the same as almost every generation that preceded them for the last five thousand years. It is the generations SINCE then that are different. And because we are different, we look to that LAST generation who had to actually go to war, as the greatest.
Actually what we call the greatest generation is really the last generation that HAD to carry cold steel into battle. This is what modernity has bought us: for men, the notion that we needn’t risk our lives in battle anymore; for women, the notion that they needn’t risk their lives in childbirth any more. And with this wonderful shedding of risk, has come a loss of higher meaning in our lives, and all the pathos of modern aimlessness and depression.
Posted on 2/20/22 at 8:33 am to Penrod
quote:
The civil war generation fought a far more deadly conflict.
Prove it.
Back to top


0







