Started By
Message

re: Old River was man made?

Posted on 8/1/20 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

So if a supervillain wanted to do super villain wanted to cause problems, they would just blow up the area between the miss river and old river?


Enjoy Gitmo.
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
30017 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

He was making 6 figures back in 1830



But he had to pay for food and the wear and tear on his horses. Taxes, too.
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
8535 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

So if a supervillain wanted to do super villain wanted to cause problems, they would just blow up the area between the miss river and old river?


No, you start at the top and blow the first large dam on the Missouri River in Ft. Peck, Montana and the result would be every dam in the Mo River system being wiped out. The result would be catastrophic along the entire Missouri and Mississippi River valleys and would wipe out every city in it's path from Pierre, Sioux City, Omaha, Kansas City, St. Louis, all the way down to New Orleans. In fact, I would think our Missouri River dam systems would be amongst the most highly guarded structures in the country.
Posted by cypressbrake3
Member since Oct 2014
3681 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 7:44 pm to
Speaking of the Missouri River, I recall reading an article many years ago saying that the Mississippi River was really a tributary of the Missouri River, and that the river continuing below their junction should have been named the Missouri River instead of the Mississippi.

Don't recall the rationale for claiming that the Mississippi River was really a tributary of the Missouri, just recall reading an article about it.
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
8535 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 7:49 pm to
That's true. I believe it's because the Mo contributes more water volume at it's confluence. But back when these rivers were named they thought the Mississippi was bigger.
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
54771 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:04 pm to
Settle down, Dr. Evil.
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
18176 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 10:14 pm to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164014 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

That's true. I believe it's because the Mo contributes more water volume at it's confluence. But back when these rivers were named they thought the Mississippi was bigger.

The Ohio River dwarfs both of them.

quote:

The Ohio River is the largest tributary by volume of the Mississippi River. At the confluence, the Ohio is considerably bigger than the Mississippi, measured by long-term mean discharge. The Ohio River at Cairo is 281,500 cu ft/s (7,960 m3/s); and the Mississippi River at Thebes, Illinois, which is upstream of the confluence, is 208,200 cu ft/s (5,897 m3/s). The Ohio River flow is higher than that of the Mississippi River so hydrologically, the Ohio River is the main stream of the river system.
This post was edited on 8/1/20 at 11:42 pm
Posted by Bigfishchoupique
Member since Jul 2017
8326 posts
Posted on 8/2/20 at 4:02 am to
quote:

Clearing the log jam on the Atchafalaya was really what accelerated the process

The log jam that Captain Shreve cleared was on the Red River.

This is how history gets fricked up. People writing about stuff they have no idea what they are talking about.
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
24245 posts
Posted on 8/2/20 at 4:38 am to
Grew up fishing that oxbow.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
29919 posts
Posted on 8/2/20 at 5:05 am to
But there's only one Horseshoe Lake. And there is no known Long Lake in the State of Louisiana.

Amirite?

Wrong, waay wrong.
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8618 posts
Posted on 8/2/20 at 8:16 am to








Posted by terriblegreen
Souf Badden Rewage
Member since Aug 2011
9590 posts
Posted on 8/2/20 at 8:52 am to
quote:

With slave labor as well.


Cancel the Mississippi River.
Posted by Zap Rowsdower
MissLou, La
Member since Sep 2010
13211 posts
Posted on 8/2/20 at 10:07 am to
Posted by Snoop Dawg
Member since Sep 2009
2183 posts
Posted on 8/2/20 at 10:42 am to
quote:


That's true. I believe it's because the Mo contributes more water volume at it's confluence. But back when these rivers were named they thought the Mississippi was bigger.



Mississippi River is significantly larger at the conference of the Missouri, but the Missouri is significantly longer.

Posted by jctiger73
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2009
254 posts
Posted on 8/2/20 at 1:04 pm to
Scientific American? C'mon man. Don't you know that science is fake. It is advanced by the government to fit whichever political narrative that is popular at the time..
Posted by PANTHER
Bunkie
Member since Oct 2004
2268 posts
Posted on 8/2/20 at 2:27 pm to
A group of us baws fish and camp there often. I guess in the spirit of the Corna we should wear our life jackets around the camp fire just Incase the structure fails.

But seriously we love that place. Great cat fishing and watching LSU football at the camp is some of the finer things in life.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram