- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obesity rates in the US have tripled in just one generation
Posted on 1/21/23 at 10:52 am to Crimson1st
Posted on 1/21/23 at 10:52 am to Crimson1st
quote:
Edit…I see BMI was used as a basis BUT I highly caution this because it does not give consideration for body composition. Michael Jordan would have qualified as overweight/obese for example. The BMI chart uses raw numbers as they relate to height and weight. I would focus more on body fat percentage as being built well with a high muscle mass will wind up putting you sideways with the BMI and in turn have you classified in the wrong group. Also, I see I have a downvote from my observation already but I’m stating facts so suck on this whomever felt the need to do that.
Yes, the difference between now and the 80s is that we have more Michael Jordanesque athlete bods out there. A simple visit to your local Wal-Mart or Golden Corral will surely confirm this brilliant take.
Posted on 1/21/23 at 10:56 am to Crimson1st
quote:
Crimson1st
quote:This right here is a perfect example of a person who is doing harm to our society and he should be shamed hard for it.
I see BMI was used as a basis BUT I highly caution this because it does not give consideration for body composition. Michael Jordan would have qualified as overweight/obese for example. The BMI chart uses raw numbers as they relate to height and weight. I would focus more on body fat percentage as being built well with a high muscle mass will wind up putting you sideways with the BMI and in turn have you classified in the wrong group. Also, I see I have a downvote from my observation already but I’m stating facts so suck on this whomever felt the need to do that.
The movement by overweight/obese individuals to disregard BMI as being inaccurate and inapplicable is moronic on every level.
Shame on you Crimson1st for being a huge part of the problem.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 10:57 am
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:00 am to redstick13
quote:
Around 10 years ago a few places in the US tried to place limits on the amounts of sugary drinks a person could purchase. I remember there being a big discussion on this very site and almost everyone was against it.
Oh, im aware. I just dont see another logical way around it if we really want to succeed at this. But i dont think we as a society do
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:03 am to josh336
quote:The way our society is currently, with its multitude of problems, the only way to fix the issues is a collapse to some degree.
Oh, im aware. I just dont see another logical way around it if we really want to succeed at this. But i dont think we as a society do
Economic collapse resulting in the inability to purchase these unhealthy foods.
There is no motivation or other way to fix it.
It will require a massive shock to the system.
I don’t see any other way. We are too far gone.
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:05 am to Scruffy
quote:Just get back from Davos?
The way our society is currently, with its multitude of problems, the only way to fix the issues is a collapse to some degree.
Economic collapse resulting in the inability to purchase these unhealthy foods.
There is no motivation or other way to fix it.
It will require a massive shock to the system.
I don’t see any other way. We are too far gone.
#greatreset
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:08 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Just get back from Davos?
#greatreset

I don’t want that outcome. Just stating my opinion.
There is no way to fix this.
Educating people clearly isn’t working.
We’ll just continue plodding along, short of breath, until it falls apart.

This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 11:10 am
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:09 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Just get back from Davos?
I bet bugs are pretty low carb

Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:26 am to GumboPot
quote:I think it's part of it but not 80%. Americans consume something like 50 pounds of HFCS a year. Australia and the UK both average less than a pound a year, per capita, and both countries are also fat as frick.
80% of the obesity epidemic is due to HFCS.
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:39 am to Antonio Moss
quote:That's true but we more than made up the difference with poultry which went from 57 pounds a year consumed to 108 pounds a year consumed over the same period. Poultry is also deep-fried far more often than beef or pork.
Beef and pork consumption fell by 20% between 1980 and 2017 in the US
LINK
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 11:49 am
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:42 am to Scruffy
quote:
This right here is a perfect example of a person who is doing harm to our society and he should be shamed hard for it. The movement by overweight/obese individuals to disregard BMI as being inaccurate and inapplicable is moronic on every level. Shame on you Crimson1st for being a huge part of the problem.
Screw you! Not once did I say that obesity was not problematic nor did I make any representation other than the BMI is not a good measurement, in my opinion, of gauging obesity because it does not account for body composition. Maybe YOU should do some self reflection on potentially overstating the problem as that does just as much harm as what you are accusing me of doing(which I didn’t).
I was and am on several fitness sites, predating my time here by years, and this is a known flaw with the BMI. If you’re too dense to understand, let me explain…people have different body structures and compositions. Someone fit and who works out will have more muscle. Muscle weighs twice as much as fat. In this country we have many gyms and a lot of folks who would due to muscle mass errantly be considered obese by the BMI. This is a fact and no, as another poster mentioned, you don’t have to know DK Metcalf either. Sports nutrition has been enhanced over the years. There are spikes in size and strength in athletics and those who partake in weigh training. This needs to be factored into the equation and the BMI does not address this.
Most of this thread that I have read has been about asking why there was such a spike and yet I have seen little(admittedly I have only read about half) addressing the measurement methods. That’s all I am doing as anything the government or “officials “ puts out these days should be questioned. And again, I feel silly for having to repeat this but your type have to apparently be talked to like a child since you want to run with your misinterpretation of my post, I’m not saying there is not an obesity issue/problems but I absolutely refute the accuracy of the BMI.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 11:50 am
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:45 am to Street Hawk
Seed oils
HFCS in nearly everything.
Grain fed ruminant meats.
Video games that are also social connection sites. (Allows visiting your buddies online instead of going down the street to see him.)
Social acceptance, bordering on promotion of body positivity (fat people proud of being fat.)
HFCS in nearly everything.
Grain fed ruminant meats.
Video games that are also social connection sites. (Allows visiting your buddies online instead of going down the street to see him.)
Social acceptance, bordering on promotion of body positivity (fat people proud of being fat.)
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:46 am to AllDayEveryDay
quote:
That's not a political statemen
Then why say illegal immigrants? Do illegal immigrant families eat differently?

Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:57 am to Scruffy
quote:
Economic collapse resulting in the inability to purchase these unhealthy foods.
Or a massive war…. Which with the current administration, economic collapse and war are both possible
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:02 pm to Bourre
I teach 7th and 8th grade and currently have 130 students this year. So these kids are 12-14 years of age when they come through my classes. I went through my rosters and thought about how many kids are overweight, obese and morbidly obese. By my count 15 were overweight, 7 were obese, and 1 was morbidly obese. I was very surprised the numbers were that low. Maybe there's hope yet!
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:02 pm to Crimson1st
quote:BMI is perfectly applicable as a generalized standard for the vast majority of Americans, and that is where this entire argument falls apart.
Not once did I say that obesity was not problematic nor did I make any representation other than the BMI is not a good measurement, in my opinion, of gauging obesity because it does not account for body composition.
quote:It is a flaw when it comes to aggressively fit individuals where muscle mass becomes a predominant variable in the equation, which, again, is not applicable to the VAST majority of Americans.
I was and am on several fitness sites, predating my time here by years, and this is a known flaw with the BMI. If you’re too dense to understand, let me explain…people have different body structures and compositions.
It is a generalizable measurement.
If you are incredibly fit, it doesn’t work well for you, as we see when people refer to the NFL players.
It works for a significant portion of everyone else who isn’t fit.
quote:The measurement has not changed.
Most of this thread that I have read has been about asking why there was such a spike and yet I have seen little(admittedly I have only read about half) addressing the measurement methods. That’s all I am doing as anything the government or “officials “ puts out these days should be questioned. And again, I feel silly for having to repeat this but your type have to apparently be talked to like a child since you want to run with your misinterpretation of my post, I’m not saying there is not an obesity issue/problems but I absolutely refute the accuracy of the BMI.
The composition has not changed, and there has not been a massive growth in overly fit Americans. There has been a massive growth in overweight/obese Americans.
Sorry for being dickish in that other post, but we have to stop disregarding a useable metric because of outliers. It allows others to completely disregard the data.
And, yes, fit Americans are currently outliers.
I do need to quit being such a dick on here.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:05 pm to Scruffy
Spending my entire life in the Deep South, I’ve always thought obesity and overweight percentages were underestimated.
30 - 40% my arse. Go to any Wal-Mart in Louisiana, tha ‘Sip, or Bama and you’ll see 2/3, or more, are fat.
30 - 40% my arse. Go to any Wal-Mart in Louisiana, tha ‘Sip, or Bama and you’ll see 2/3, or more, are fat.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:06 pm to Antonio Moss
quote::raiseshand:
I can’t think of a single person I know who has achieved any level of substantial weight loss on a carbohydrate heavy diet.
I lost 130 pounds on a carb heavy diet and have kept it off for 5+ years eating the same way. Now if you're referring to simple carbs then I agree with you.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:10 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
30 - 40% my arse. Go to any Wal-Mart in Louisiana, tha ‘Sip, or Bama and you’ll see 2/3, or more, are fat.
Lower income people tend to be fatter than the general population. Not that all Walmart customers are lower income but that is their primary customer base.
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:12 pm to fallguy_1978
Okay. Go to Target or a nice restaurant then. Same thing. Southerners are fat as shite.
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:16 pm to Esquire
quote:
Parents are too lazy to cook, raising kids on fast food. Fat kids become fat adults. Rinse and repeat.
Fast food restaurants have been around for 60 years. That is far from the only reason. The two parent working model has led to people eating out more. The bigger issue is less activity among children. This is the first generation that was raised by parents that played video games. Also, technology advances and massive advances in availability of television content. We are becoming a less active society m, especially for children.
Popular
Back to top
