- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: O-T lawyers… what happened to McGlinchey Stafford?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:03 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:03 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:I just saw they brought in a couple shareholders, including one I love mediating with.
I’m fairly sure TWPD is looking to hire if you’re willing to relocate.
Seems like they're expanding.
Before that recent hire, I only knew of people who left TWPD after starting there. Didn't know anyone who began practicing elsewhere and joined TWPD
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:04 pm to Lou Loomis
quote:
Lou Loomis
Wild guess here…you’ve made some dumbass decisions in life and paid dearly for your stupidity in court.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:21 pm to RichJ
quote:
The Thibeaux 25% Firm is what happened…
Hey now!!! That’s my man, Omar!!! He is a good dude. Good man.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:21 pm to LazloHollyfeld
Ain’t that the truth! Got carpal tunnel trying to keep up with so much fraudulent client billing.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:15 am to PP7 for heisman
Isn't TW just a couple rainmakers with all the equity, and then everyone else is just a glorified associate regardless of title? I know people who have worked there and left. That's what they told me.
McGlinchey has had problems for a while. Arguably since the 90s, if you know your law firm history. I do suspect going overboard on DEI had a role in this. Also, the mention of collections problems suggests a lot of high volume insurance work with third party AI billing applications cutting bills way down. There is going to come a day of reckoning on that when policy holders realize their counsel is totally hamstrung with ridiculous billing "guidelines."
McGlinchey has had problems for a while. Arguably since the 90s, if you know your law firm history. I do suspect going overboard on DEI had a role in this. Also, the mention of collections problems suggests a lot of high volume insurance work with third party AI billing applications cutting bills way down. There is going to come a day of reckoning on that when policy holders realize their counsel is totally hamstrung with ridiculous billing "guidelines."
Posted on 1/7/26 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think AI is going to have ripple effects in the higher end firms like this over the next 5 years
I agree that AI is a huge threat to lawyers. I have a friend that wanted to sue someone. He used AI to draft his petition. He sent it to me to look it over before he filed it. It was damn good and just needed a little polishing. I could see today’s lawyers handling a higher caseload with fewer staff.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:03 am to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
I agree that AI is a huge threat to lawyers. I have a friend that wanted to sue someone. He used AI to draft his petition. He sent it to me to look it over before he filed it. It was damn good and just needed a little polishing.
Yeah I've just tested random AIs generating random documents and they're pretty good. With so many documents scanned online, it can even be pretty jurisdiction specific. Clearly not something a (decent, at least) lawyer would file, but for pro se? YUGE upgrade over what I've seen in my time.
But the hard part is the next part.
quote:
I could see today’s lawyers handling a higher caseload with fewer staff.
THIS is going to be the first step.
I think then you see ripples with doc review and major discovery review. Also, companies who are paying these firms will have their own AIs doing the same work to give them a lot of oversight into the time needed and quality of output. There will oversight on these firms like they couldn't believe. No more double/triple billing and all the faxing back and forth at mediation like I've heard stories about in the 90s. No more margin on things like paper or secretarial work.
Once AIs become more formalized/standardized, and there is an industry-wide accepted option or 2, those AIs are going to wreck shop on transactional work, contract ligation, etc. The documents will all be made pursuant to the AI standardizations and the AIs will have a standardized review process. There will probably be a favored segment of accepted arbitrators for ancillary disputes. It will take some time to get formalized and standardized but there is no reason why this sort of work will require much humanity.
While this is the most complicated area for your less capable lawyers (which is why the big firms do it), this is the easiest stuff for AI. This kind of machine learning on the same stuff over and over again is where AI thrives. This has the same applicability over patent laws, regulatory law,e tc.
*ETA: and AI-impacts on driving will eventually gut the PI and insurance defense industries. The more robots we have driving, the fewer collisions will result.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 8:05 am
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
While this is the most complicated area for your less capable lawyers (which is why the big firms do it), this is the easiest stuff for AI. This kind of machine learning on the same stuff over and over again is where AI thrives. This has the same applicability over patent laws, regulatory law,e tc.
Might have to poison pill any future contract with the clause any contract written or aided by AI is null and void.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 8:07 am
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No more margin on things like paper or secretarial work.
A lot of lawyers had a profit center in the IBM copier back in the day.
I haven’t billed for copying (except huge runs, which I third-party) or anything remotely like it for decades.
Also AI bill review is happening now, and you are graded against other firms.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:08 am to Tarps99
quote:
Might have to poison pill any contract with the clause any contract written or aided by AI is null and void.
Why? The whole point is that once there is a standardized/accepted process, transactions costs related to contracts will rapidly decline. The people paying the lawyers now will be able to create a system to largely remove the lawyers from the process. Why would they want to insert poison pills to go back to the old system?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why would they want to insert poison pills to go back to the old system?
Old system pays more…
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The people paying the lawyers now will be able to create a system to largely remove the lawyers from the process.
I doubt this. You get paid for your judgment.
AI will be overused for a time until someone drops a multi-million or billion dollar ball with it. The lawyers left standing will clean up then.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:12 am to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
Also AI bill review is happening now, and you are graded against other firms.
Yeah the prestigious route was already laden with annoyances but the meat grinder aspect is going to only get worse. frick that.
And like most are saying, more firms are going to find issues like MS did. Rainmakers will be more valuable and grinders will be less valuable.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:14 am to LSUFanHouston
I remember back when they were Rubin, Curry, Calvin, and Joseph
When I was a kid, my mom worked there (for Curry) and Mike Rubin used to let me hang out around the offices. He drew cool cartoons and had a good sense of humor.
When I got into college, after they merged with McGlinchey, I worked the library there and was their host/signing entertainment for their Christmas parties.
When I was a kid, my mom worked there (for Curry) and Mike Rubin used to let me hang out around the offices. He drew cool cartoons and had a good sense of humor.
When I got into college, after they merged with McGlinchey, I worked the library there and was their host/signing entertainment for their Christmas parties.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Rainmakers will be more valuable and grinders will be less valuable.
Been happening for a while.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:26 am to RanchoLaPuerto
AI/computerized bill review has been happening for a while.
I don’t see AI in this firm’s mess. I think they got over their skis trying to become prestigious nationwide and once that daughter’s book of business left they decided to close shop.
I think there is a lot of wishful thinking for AI’s impacts on white collar work, especially lawyers.
I don’t see AI in this firm’s mess. I think they got over their skis trying to become prestigious nationwide and once that daughter’s book of business left they decided to close shop.
I think there is a lot of wishful thinking for AI’s impacts on white collar work, especially lawyers.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 8:27 am
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:28 am to udtiger
quote:
This is a legal earthquake.
This is not K&E or Latham or some shite. It isn’t like when Patton Boggs nearly went tits up and merged with Squire Sanders. Or when Dewey did go tits up. They had over 1,000 lawyers. McGlinchey shuttering is hardly an earthquake.
It does suck for the lawyers there, but I have to imagine they are pretty siloed anyway.
They have offices in fricking Irvine, CA, NYC, Albany, NY, and Baton Rouge. Why? How do those sync with and lift up the Birmingham office, for instance?
The whole firm seemed to just be scattershot. The ones in cities like Irvine and NYC will hopefully have their practice groups absorbed into other firms.
The NOLA and BR folks will hopefully be able to go to other mid sized firms or start their own firms and everyone will be fine.
It sucks, but it’s not a “legal earthquake.”
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:32 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
18 offices and 160 employees… firms that size don’t just fall apart.
Hard to imagine there was still not significant value left to maintain a firm that with that many offices and employees that services many different industries, at least according their website. Like others have said, they have been making a bunch of moves indicative of a firm that was still growing, not about to fall apart.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:46 am to LSUFanHouston
they probably failed to get rid of step and lock comp for the older lawyers and all the young rainmakers left because they knew it was BS they were paying for old lawyers who added no value. If the daughter of the MP left, that is most likely the reason.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:03 am to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
A lot of lawyers had a profit center in the IBM copier back in the day.
I’m in house. I came on board with a new company six years ago. One of the first decisions I made was firing outside counsel who was charging for copies and passing along the west law bill.
Popular
Back to top



1







