Started By
Message

re: Not basing laws on morality

Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:48 am to
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
60968 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:48 am to
quote:

What if they submit to it?
Then you are dealing with an employment contract. They always own themselves.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29087 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Volitional beings own themselves.
When does volition develop? In the womb? Does it end after a certain level of mental decline or deficiency? Can a person on their own volition submit to being co-owned?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77002 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:49 am to
quote:

I've often wondered if we would ever come to a point that animal "slavery" would become a legit topic and/or discussion
We are already on our way there.

The big push to eat less meat and the push for animal condition improvement is the harbinger, ISO.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29087 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Correct, as long as it’s 2 non-related, consenting adults.


Why do you insist on inserting your own morals into the law when it's clearly not necessary for legal purposes?
This post was edited on 9/16/21 at 10:51 am
Posted by carhartt
Member since Feb 2013
8318 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:53 am to
Gotta have some morals to it. Most people agree that marriage, at its basic, should be between 2 consenting adults that aren’t related. Poll 1000 people and at least 80% would agree with that.
Posted by Tigers2010a
Member since Jul 2021
3627 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:54 am to
quote:

There is no morality. Never has been, never will be.


How do you support your statement that there is no morality?

I would argue that morality is a defining trait of humans as sentient conscious beings. Morality is an inherent quality of humanity. Remove morality and we are no longer have a human being.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85892 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Morality is an inherent quality of humanity. Remove morality and we are no longer have a human being.



there are plenty of animals that exhibit their own morality FWIW

Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29087 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Then you are dealing with an employment contract. They always own themselves.
Employment is rental. Why can't one submit to being owned?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
74469 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Gotta have some morals to it. Most people agree that marriage, at its basic, should be between 2 consenting adults that aren’t related. Poll 1000 people and at least 80% would agree with that.


Dear Lord. I hope it would be much closer to 100% than 80%. But society’s moral compass has been degrading quickly in the last 2 decades.
Posted by carhartt
Member since Feb 2013
8318 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Dear Lord. I hope it would be much closer to 100% than 80%. But society’s moral compass has been degrading quickly in the last 2 decades.


It should be higher. But there would be a group that would disagree with the statement because it doesn’t include anything about the 2 people being straight.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85892 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:02 am to
quote:

But society’s moral compass has been degrading quickly in the last 2 decades.


when was peak morality?

please don't view that as an attack or anything, I'm genuinely curious

I enjoy these types of discussions
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
60968 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:02 am to
quote:

When does volition develop? In the womb? Does it end after a certain level of mental decline or deficiency? Can a person on their own volition submit to being co-owned?
Wrong rabbit hole you are running down.

Think in terms of the whole human species not your crazy uncle.

You own you life and all non-procreative derivatives of said life.

This post was edited on 9/16/21 at 11:04 am
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29087 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Gotta have some morals to it.
Why? Because of "slippery slopes"? You are making the slope slippery by adding unneeded qualifiers. Just end it at consenting adults. You don't even need to say "two". If you add "that aren't related", that opens the door for someone else to say "they also can't be the same sex/different color/whatever other subjective morals someone wants to insert".

Just make it a contract like any other.
quote:

Most people agree that marriage, at its basic, should be between 2 consenting adults that aren’t related. Poll 1000 people and at least 80% would agree with that.
Depends on the sample. In certain areas of Utah some would probably object to "2". Insert Alabama joke about relatives. Nationwide you might be close, but that still doesn't explain why we must insert morals into this contract.
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
60968 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Why can't one submit to being owned?
Because the only owner of you is you.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
74469 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:05 am to
quote:

when was peak morality?


good question. that’s honestly highly debatable and i’m not really one to enjoy religious discussions with anyone. It’s lazy, but i’d say that timeframe has long past.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29087 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Wrong rabbit hole you are running down.
I'm just trying to understand why a person can't be owned. Don't get me wrong, I definitely agree. I'm just trying to talk out the reasoning without inserting morals.
Posted by 3rdgentgr
Member since Jan 2011
922 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:07 am to
Relativism vs Absolutism

Depends on if you believe in a supreme lawgiver or do you believe that everyone can decide what is lawful in his own eyes
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29087 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Because the only owner of you is you.
Yeah you keep saying that, but I'm asking why.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85892 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:09 am to
quote:

i’m not really one to enjoy religious discussions with anyone


doesn't necessarily have to be religious based, although religion would certainly have a lot to do with it

quote:

but i’d say that timeframe has long past.


kind of hard for me to view periods where humans had less rights based off their race and sex and our justification for murder was far lower as times of higher morals

Posted by carhartt
Member since Feb 2013
8318 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:09 am to
quote:

If you add "that aren't related"


You saying it should be ok for 2 adult siblings to get married?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram