- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Next upcoming Aug marks the 77th anniversary since little boy and fat man were dropped
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:54 am
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:54 am
Do you support Truman's decision? If not, do you think that the Japs were on the verge of surrendering or were we going to have to invade their mainland? Was the projected loss of Americans worth dropping the bombs?
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:55 am to Displaced
I chuckled.
This post was edited on 5/27/21 at 7:58 am
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:55 am to Displaced
Yes, lol japs were not surrendering, losses would have been catastrophic.
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:56 am to Displaced
Almost feel like this post was intentional
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:56 am to Displaced
Your math is bad too.
ETA: I see. Kind of groggy this morning.
ETA: I see. Kind of groggy this morning.
This post was edited on 5/27/21 at 8:00 am
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:57 am to Displaced
quote:
Next upcoming Aug marks the 77th anniversary since little boy and fat man were dropped
have an upvote
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:58 am to Displaced
quote:
Do you support Truman's decision?
Yes. The Russians were going to get in on those gains if we didn’t end the war quickly and show them who was boss.
Posted on 5/27/21 at 8:00 am to Displaced
The atomic bombs were concentrated physical systemic racism, so no.
Posted on 5/27/21 at 8:54 am to Displaced
The Japanese were not close to surrender, even though they knew defeat was inevitable. The estimated combined casualties of an invasion of Japanese home islands ranges into the tens of millions. It would have been the bloodiest campaign in history and an absolute slog for the American GI's. People who know nothing of the Japanese psyche and beliefs of the time will point fingers at the US and try to shame them for using nuclear bombs on cities. The fact of the matter is that far more Japanese civilians and millions of Americans would have died if we hadn't dropped them.
This post was edited on 5/27/21 at 8:55 am
Posted on 5/27/21 at 8:59 am to Displaced
Historically speaking I absolutely agree with dropping both nukes....it cemented America's power as the military power in the World.
I also agree with it from a WWII and humane standpoint....The Japanese at the time weren't just going to stop killing people because we killed a few of their soldiers. I mean the death toll they would have created on the way to losing the war ultimately would have been enormous. Dropping the nukes saved American lives without a doubt.
I also agree with it from a WWII and humane standpoint....The Japanese at the time weren't just going to stop killing people because we killed a few of their soldiers. I mean the death toll they would have created on the way to losing the war ultimately would have been enormous. Dropping the nukes saved American lives without a doubt.
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:12 am to Displaced
quote:
Do you support Truman's decision?
NO!
I think he should have dropped them on Tokyo and Osaka.
THAT would have really gotten their attention.
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:32 am to Displaced
quote:
Next upcoming Aug marks the 77th anniversary since little boy and fat man were dropped
And oddly enough, Japan seemed to get over that rather quickly.
If only all demographics could let things go regarding shite that happened forever ago...
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:37 am to Displaced
While on this subject, I came across this website James Perloff while searching for something related to nuclear weapons (more on that later).
Some wacky stuff, not sure what to make of it.
Wild claim #1:
Wild claim #2:
I would love to read these books and dig into this strange take on Truman, but their prices are too high a barrier to satisfy my curiosity.
As for the nuclear weapons material - its code name is Fogbank. This is what is known about it:
- its purpose in a nuclear weapon is classified
- the materials used in its fabrication are classified
- the fabrication method is classified
- it's so secret that the original recipe was lost, and had to be recreated at considerable expense.
Some wacky stuff, not sure what to make of it.
Wild claim #1:
quote:
In 1952, Major George Racey Jordan, a Lend-Lease expediter during the war, revealed that the Roosevelt-Truman administration had shipped the Soviet Union both the blueprints and materials for making the atomic bomb.
Wild claim #2:
quote:
As documented in Kubek’s book noted above, the Truman State Department went into overdrive helping put Mao Tse-tung and the communists into power in China, so much so that even Capitol Hill Democrats condemned the President for it, including young Congressman John F. Kennedy.2 Truman did not send over 30,000 American soldiers to their deaths in the Korean War in order to “fight Communism,” but to validate the UN as a “peacekeeper” and to set a permanent precedent for by-passing Congress’s Constitutional authority to declare war. A 33rd degree Freemason who was the 33rd U.S. President, Truman also served Zionism with servility, recognizing Israel within minutes of its declaration of statehood, after AIPAC founder Abraham Feinberg gave him $2 million in a suitcase, discussed in another post on this site.
I would love to read these books and dig into this strange take on Truman, but their prices are too high a barrier to satisfy my curiosity.
As for the nuclear weapons material - its code name is Fogbank. This is what is known about it:
- its purpose in a nuclear weapon is classified
- the materials used in its fabrication are classified
- the fabrication method is classified
- it's so secret that the original recipe was lost, and had to be recreated at considerable expense.
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:46 am to Displaced
Wouldn't this be a better thread in say.....August?
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:46 am to Displaced
It’s hard to believe that bombing massive civilian populations was the right answer but if you look at the casualties at any of the individual battles for tiny islands, the math sorta justifies it.
Okinawa had between 40-150k civilian casualties, and it’s nothing compared to the main islands.
Okinawa had between 40-150k civilian casualties, and it’s nothing compared to the main islands.
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:59 am to SammyTiger
quote:
It's hard to believe bombing massive civilian populations was the right answer
This quote by Ennius: “The victor is not victorious if the vanquished does not consider himself so.” may be part of the reason.
Germans had no qualms about bombing London to break England's spirit. Dresden was the payback. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki demonstrated to what ends the US would go to end the war. Japan had no answer other than surrender.
Posted on 5/27/21 at 10:42 am to Displaced
Highly recommend recommend Dan Carlins podcast series on Japan from the 1830s to post WWII. I'm finishing it up now. He goes into detail on what led to dropping the bombs.
Dan Carlin Supernova in the East
Dan Carlin Supernova in the East
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News