Started By
Message

Next upcoming Aug marks the 77th anniversary since little boy and fat man were dropped

Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:54 am
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32712 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:54 am
Do you support Truman's decision? If not, do you think that the Japs were on the verge of surrendering or were we going to have to invade their mainland? Was the projected loss of Americans worth dropping the bombs?
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:55 am to
1st page
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58780 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:55 am to
Come on, man.
Posted by VolsOut4Harambe
Atlanta, GA
Member since Sep 2017
12856 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:55 am to
I chuckled.
This post was edited on 5/27/21 at 7:58 am
Posted by NorthshoreTiger76
Pelicans, Saints, & LSU Fan
Member since May 2009
80180 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:55 am to
Yes, lol japs were not surrendering, losses would have been catastrophic.
Posted by DomincDecoco
of no fixed abode
Member since Oct 2018
10879 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:56 am to
Almost feel like this post was intentional
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58780 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:56 am to
Your math is bad too.

ETA: I see. Kind of groggy this morning.
This post was edited on 5/27/21 at 8:00 am
Posted by iAmBatman
The Batcave
Member since Mar 2011
12382 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Next upcoming Aug marks the 77th anniversary since little boy and fat man were dropped





have an upvote
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26388 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Do you support Truman's decision?


Yes. The Russians were going to get in on those gains if we didn’t end the war quickly and show them who was boss.
Posted by STLDawg
The Lou
Member since Apr 2015
3718 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 8:00 am to
The atomic bombs were concentrated physical systemic racism, so no.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 8:01 am to
Yes. No. Definitely.
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 8:54 am to
The Japanese were not close to surrender, even though they knew defeat was inevitable. The estimated combined casualties of an invasion of Japanese home islands ranges into the tens of millions. It would have been the bloodiest campaign in history and an absolute slog for the American GI's. People who know nothing of the Japanese psyche and beliefs of the time will point fingers at the US and try to shame them for using nuclear bombs on cities. The fact of the matter is that far more Japanese civilians and millions of Americans would have died if we hadn't dropped them.
This post was edited on 5/27/21 at 8:55 am
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29289 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 8:59 am to
Historically speaking I absolutely agree with dropping both nukes....it cemented America's power as the military power in the World.

I also agree with it from a WWII and humane standpoint....The Japanese at the time weren't just going to stop killing people because we killed a few of their soldiers. I mean the death toll they would have created on the way to losing the war ultimately would have been enormous. Dropping the nukes saved American lives without a doubt.
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Do you support Truman's decision?



NO!

I think he should have dropped them on Tokyo and Osaka.

THAT would have really gotten their attention.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Next upcoming Aug marks the 77th anniversary since little boy and fat man were dropped


And oddly enough, Japan seemed to get over that rather quickly.

If only all demographics could let things go regarding shite that happened forever ago...
Posted by Unobtanium
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2009
1593 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:37 am to
While on this subject, I came across this website James Perloff while searching for something related to nuclear weapons (more on that later).

Some wacky stuff, not sure what to make of it.

Wild claim #1:
quote:

In 1952, Major George Racey Jordan, a Lend-Lease expediter during the war, revealed that the Roosevelt-Truman administration had shipped the Soviet Union both the blueprints and materials for making the atomic bomb.


Wild claim #2:
quote:

As documented in Kubek’s book noted above, the Truman State Department went into overdrive helping put Mao Tse-tung and the communists into power in China, so much so that even Capitol Hill Democrats condemned the President for it, including young Congressman John F. Kennedy.2 Truman did not send over 30,000 American soldiers to their deaths in the Korean War in order to “fight Communism,” but to validate the UN as a “peacekeeper” and to set a permanent precedent for by-passing Congress’s Constitutional authority to declare war. A 33rd degree Freemason who was the 33rd U.S. President, Truman also served Zionism with servility, recognizing Israel within minutes of its declaration of statehood, after AIPAC founder Abraham Feinberg gave him $2 million in a suitcase, discussed in another post on this site.


I would love to read these books and dig into this strange take on Truman, but their prices are too high a barrier to satisfy my curiosity.

As for the nuclear weapons material - its code name is Fogbank. This is what is known about it:
- its purpose in a nuclear weapon is classified
- the materials used in its fabrication are classified
- the fabrication method is classified
- it's so secret that the original recipe was lost, and had to be recreated at considerable expense.
Posted by Adajax
Member since Nov 2015
6126 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:46 am to
Wouldn't this be a better thread in say.....August?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66572 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:46 am to
It’s hard to believe that bombing massive civilian populations was the right answer but if you look at the casualties at any of the individual battles for tiny islands, the math sorta justifies it.

Okinawa had between 40-150k civilian casualties, and it’s nothing compared to the main islands.
Posted by Unobtanium
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2009
1593 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 9:59 am to
quote:

It's hard to believe bombing massive civilian populations was the right answer


This quote by Ennius: “The victor is not victorious if the vanquished does not consider himself so.” may be part of the reason.

Germans had no qualms about bombing London to break England's spirit. Dresden was the payback. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki demonstrated to what ends the US would go to end the war. Japan had no answer other than surrender.
Posted by AllDayEveryDay
Nawf Tejas
Member since Jun 2015
7028 posts
Posted on 5/27/21 at 10:42 am to
Highly recommend recommend Dan Carlins podcast series on Japan from the 1830s to post WWII. I'm finishing it up now. He goes into detail on what led to dropping the bombs.

Dan Carlin Supernova in the East
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram