- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:47 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:47 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Absolute morons posting shite like Karolne Leavitt. Who think frick thinks posting something so moronically wrong and proven so is a good idea?.
Is she inadvertently posting that socialized medicine is doing the right thing?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:47 pm to Barbellthor
quote:Where did Fauci or any actual doctor do this?
It's the false claim that the shot was perfect
See , it isn’t a good idea to lie and using hyperbole when you are actively complaining about someone for lying and using hyperbole
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:49 pm to Barbellthor
quote:
It's the false claim that the shot was perfect, there were no concerns or questions,
They are literally asking and answering the questions in the texts.
You are just getting texts of notes from the process. They didn't start out with no questions, they went through a process to satisfy questions.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:52 pm to lsupride87
I am pro vaccine and pro covid vaccine
But….
I don’t think it is right that Fauci was telling the public one thing and then privately telling colleagues something else
Where are you seeing that between the date of the texts and the date he went on tv to claim pregnant women had no risk, there was some sort of update or new study?
But….
I don’t think it is right that Fauci was telling the public one thing and then privately telling colleagues something else
Where are you seeing that between the date of the texts and the date he went on tv to claim pregnant women had no risk, there was some sort of update or new study?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:55 pm to lsupride87
This is what people have a problem with:
Why are you flat out telling pregnant women that they have nothing to fear and that the covid vaccine cannot cause miscarriages, while privately admitting that it’s theoretically possible for it to happen?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Why are you flat out telling pregnant women that they have nothing to fear and that the covid vaccine cannot cause miscarriages, while privately admitting that it’s theoretically possible for it to happen?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:56 pm to lsupride87
For years the media, political elites, fauci led cdc, etc. pushed the lie that the shot prevented you from getting covid and there were no known or meaningful side effects, AND that you were a far right conspiracy theorist if you asked questions about it, masks, etc.
My brainwashed grandparents still push the lie that ivermectin is an ineffective horse wormer.
In these same texts is discussed not wanting to alarm pregnant mothers away from taking the shot by noting the concerns. It's incredible to see government cucks to this day.
My brainwashed grandparents still push the lie that ivermectin is an ineffective horse wormer.
In these same texts is discussed not wanting to alarm pregnant mothers away from taking the shot by noting the concerns. It's incredible to see government cucks to this day.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:57 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:He wasn’t
I don’t think it is right that Fauci was telling the public one thing and then privately telling colleagues something else
He said it was theoretically possible there could be a risk. Doesn’t even say anything is linked at all, just saying it’s theoretically possible. That was on January 21, 2021
The Covid vaccine was not recommended for pregnant women until August 2021, after the completion of this trial which was published shortly after in September
quote:
The 2021 study most often cited on this question is the CDC's v-safe analysis by Zauche and colleagues, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in September 2021. Using the CDC's v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry, the researchers followed 2,456 women who received at least one dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine before conception or before 20 weeks of gestation and measured their cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion (pregnancy loss) between 6 and less than 20 weeks. The key finding was that the estimated risks (14.1% overall and 12.8% in age-standardized analyses) are consistent with the risks of spontaneous abortion reported in the general population. In other words, vaccinated women miscarried at the same background rate seen in unvaccinated pregnancies. As the authors put it, the risk of spontaneous abortion after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination either before conception or during pregnancy is consistent with the expected risk of spontaneous abortion
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:58 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Hes a national disgrace and profited from his power
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:58 pm to Barbellthor
quote:I took the COVID shot almost first due to working in hospitals. All the way back then I signed paperwork about all the potential side effects.
fauci led cdc, etc. pushed the lie that the shot prevented you from getting covid and there were no known or meaningful side effects, AND that you were a far right conspiracy theorist if you asked questions about it, masks, etc.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 6:59 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Why are you flat out telling pregnant women that they have nothing to fear and that the covid vaccine cannot cause miscarriages, while privately admitting that it’s theoretically possible for it to happen?
It is theoretically possible for you to suck a dick tonight. It could happen. Should I assume you are going to suck a dick or am.I safe accepting that the chances are close enough to nil that you won't be sucking one?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:01 pm to Barbellthor
quote:
For years the media, political elites, fauci led cdc, etc. pushed the lie that the shot prevented you from getting covid and there were no known or meaningful side effects, AND that you were a far right conspiracy theorist if you asked questions about it, masks, etc.
I think you spent way too much time in your own echo chambers.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:01 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:Is this a real question?
Why are you flat out telling pregnant women that they have nothing to fear and that the covid vaccine cannot cause miscarriages, while privately admitting that it’s theoretically possible for it to happen?
It’s not conflicting at all. Something was theoretically possible while also all data was showing no risk. Those can both be 100% true statements that don’t conflict whatsoever . Is this really confusing to you?
It’s theoretically possible Rutgers could win the national title, all available data shows that will not happen
That really confuses you?
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:03 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I took the COVID shot almost first due to working in hospitals. All the way back then I signed paperwork about all the potential side effects.
Ok? Most people don't work in hospitals, hospitals aren't the cdc, news, etc., and your hospital isn't the person whose texts we're talking about.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:04 pm to Barbellthor
Show me one person with even a morsel of credibility saying there are no potential side effects to the vaccine
You are using just as much or more hyperbole to try and prove your point than the people you are angry at for using hyperbole to try and make their point
You are using just as much or more hyperbole to try and prove your point than the people you are angry at for using hyperbole to try and make their point
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:14 pm to lsupride87
I appreciate the fallacies of minimalizing and playing semantics (am I using hyperbole or generalizing, and was Fauci/the elites simply being hyperbolic or lying in positions of trust?), but no I am summarizing about Fauci.
In one breath people blame President Trump when he did [not] imply injecting one's self with bleach because he's in a position of power while excusing Fauci in a position of power by switching him for others who maybe mentioned in some fine print that there were maybe some side effects.
There's no need to try to gaslight me about the numerous years of, "Trust the settled science or you're a far right nazi! You won't get covid if you just take the shot, comrade." It happened.
Fauci helped downplay legitimate concerns and questions. The point is as simple as that, and it's kind of a big deal. He destroyed our trust in institutions and single handedly ushered in an actual anti vax movement.
Science is difficult, and people die in life. That's not a surprise. The problem is he lied about the mistakes. THAT is what we're mad about.
In one breath people blame President Trump when he did [not] imply injecting one's self with bleach because he's in a position of power while excusing Fauci in a position of power by switching him for others who maybe mentioned in some fine print that there were maybe some side effects.
There's no need to try to gaslight me about the numerous years of, "Trust the settled science or you're a far right nazi! You won't get covid if you just take the shot, comrade." It happened.
Fauci helped downplay legitimate concerns and questions. The point is as simple as that, and it's kind of a big deal. He destroyed our trust in institutions and single handedly ushered in an actual anti vax movement.
Science is difficult, and people die in life. That's not a surprise. The problem is he lied about the mistakes. THAT is what we're mad about.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:16 pm to Barbellthor
quote:But he didn’t
Fauci helped downplay legitimate concerns and questions. The point is as simple as that, and it's kind of a big deal.
As it relates to the vaccine Fauci didn’t misinterpret anything and not even hindsight has proven him wrong
All studies still to this day show it was extremely safe and did a great job of fighting covid 19
Fauci’s crimes lie with Covid 19 the virus itself
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 7:16 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:17 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The studies came out showing the shot was not a risk for pregnant women
The “gotcha” will be the nature of the studies. How were they conducted and were they appropriate. I would highly doubt that the studies would be very reputable if done in such a short time…….and if you know anything about medical research……..was it done on first trimester pregnancies? I highly highly doubt that was the case. So, he voices concern, and then after questionable research OKs it?
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:17 pm to NawlinsTiger9
which part(s) of his statement do you disagree with?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:20 pm to Old Character
quote:The studies are still happening not relayed to Fauci at all and show no risk for pregnant women
The “gotcha” will be the nature of the studies. How were they conducted and were they appropriate. I would highly doubt that the studies would be very reputable if done in such a short time…….and if you know anything about medical research……..was it done on first trimester pregnancies? I highly highly doubt that was the case. So, he voices concern, and then after questionable research OKs it?
quote:
A large body of research has consistently found that getting a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy does not raise the risk of miscarriage. The strongest evidence comes from a 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis published in Human Reproduction, which pooled data from 21 studies covering nearly 150,000 women. Compared to those who received a placebo or no vaccination, women who received a COVID-19 vaccine did not have a higher risk of miscarriage (risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.89–1.28), and had comparable rates for ongoing pregnancy or live birth. A risk ratio near 1.0 means the two groups were essentially the same, and the confidence interval crossing 1.0 means there was no statistically meaningful difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated women. Individual large studies point the same way: a Dutch cohort of 4,640 pregnant women concluded that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of miscarriage in gestational weeks 6–20, and a Norwegian registry case-control study similarly reported no evidence of an increased risk of first-trimester pregnancy loss associated with COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 7:21 pm to Klark Kent
quote:The part about Fauci and the medical community saying there were no side effects of the vaccine
which part(s) of his statement do you disagree with?
You can go see Fauci and the CDC referencing myocarditis risks as far back as 2021.
This post was edited on 8/10/26 at 7:23 pm
Popular
Back to top


0







