- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:26 pm to honeybadger07
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:26 pm to honeybadger07
quote:
He obviously saw there was data to potentially support a higher rate of miscarriage's
But he didn't say that. He said theoretically there could be an issue with it. We tested that theory and it was proven to not be an issue because miscarriage rates were exactly the same.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:54 pm to Ingeniero
He actually sent a follow up text that exact same day saying that data from 10,000 vaccinated pregnant women showed no risk of miscarriages
Posted on 8/11/26 at 3:43 pm to lsupride87
Tuberville is an absolute idiot. “Fortunately” he’s just going to be Alabama’s problem in a few months.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 3:44 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
But he didn't say that
He was sending text messages. No way he puts a whole train of thought in a text message.
Exactly why he took the 5th. People cant deal with context.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 8/11/26 at 3:53 pm to fightin tigers
quote:or he has a pardon and all of his past lies are covered so best to not do it again
Exactly why he took the 5th. People cant deal with context.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:01 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
or he has a pardon and all of his past lies are covered so best to not do it again
Yep.
Ain't no way I would talk to someone who say their goal is to see me behind bars.
Sorry brah, good luck with getting your answers with threats.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:07 pm to fightin tigers
The shot was approved for use by the FDA in December of 2020 with phase 1 trial testing on humans starting in April of 2020. So as I stated before, it was under a year (only a month available to public).
For the trial phases both Moderna and Pfizer tested people for being pregnant as they DID NOT WANT TO TEST ON PREGNANT WOMEN. 12 women made it through the cracks on Pfizer being pregnant in phase trials and a small undisclosed amount for Moderna.
So you tell me how in the hell is one supposed to say one way or the other if it is safe for pregnant women when the trials were intended to avoid pregnant women.
So I ask again…how can he have concern it could cause problems and then less than a month later tell the public there is no concern with ZERO evidence to support that claim. In the end it may have turned out not to cause it, but it also could have and he is making recommendations with no evidence to support it.
Try harder dumb frick
For the trial phases both Moderna and Pfizer tested people for being pregnant as they DID NOT WANT TO TEST ON PREGNANT WOMEN. 12 women made it through the cracks on Pfizer being pregnant in phase trials and a small undisclosed amount for Moderna.
So you tell me how in the hell is one supposed to say one way or the other if it is safe for pregnant women when the trials were intended to avoid pregnant women.
So I ask again…how can he have concern it could cause problems and then less than a month later tell the public there is no concern with ZERO evidence to support that claim. In the end it may have turned out not to cause it, but it also could have and he is making recommendations with no evidence to support it.
Try harder dumb frick
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:12 pm to honeybadger07
quote:
he is making recommendations with no evidence to support it.
If this were true, you’d have a point.
But it’s not, so you don’t.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:12 pm to NawlinsTiger9
April of 2021 is when the CDC guidance came out…4 months after it came out for public use and for a vaccine that was intentionally NOT tested on pregnant women before that.
Let me repeat…CLINICAL PHASE TRIALS WERE NOT TESTED ON PREGNANT WOMEN.
Let me repeat…CLINICAL PHASE TRIALS WERE NOT TESTED ON PREGNANT WOMEN.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:12 pm to honeybadger07
quote:
The shot was approved for use by the FDA in December of 2020 with phase 1 trial testing on humans starting in April of 2020. So as I stated before, it was under a year (only a month available to public).
Couldn't even be bothered to read the OP or the text messages.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:13 pm to honeybadger07
quote:
Let me repeat…CLINICAL PHASE TRIALS WERE NOT TESTED ON PREGNANT WOMEN.
So no pregnant women had taken rhe shot. You are sure of this.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:16 pm to Ingeniero
You did not test that theory before he said pregnant women can take it.
Go see how many pregnant women were tested during trial phases and get back to me on how he had enough evidence to support recommending it.
In the end, the data may have shown it didn’t cause more miscarriages..but we had “Mr Science” stating there was zero to worry about and recommending it with no actual phase trial data to support that claim and this was not told to the public that no clinical testing had been done to support this recommendation.
Try harder
Go see how many pregnant women were tested during trial phases and get back to me on how he had enough evidence to support recommending it.
In the end, the data may have shown it didn’t cause more miscarriages..but we had “Mr Science” stating there was zero to worry about and recommending it with no actual phase trial data to support that claim and this was not told to the public that no clinical testing had been done to support this recommendation.
Try harder
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:21 pm to fightin tigers
Clinical trials tested women for being pregnant before accepting them into trial phasing as they did NOT want pregnant women testing out the vaccine.
According to Pfizer’s, 12 women given the vaccine made it through trials after getting pregnant after the trials had started.
Sit down dude.
According to Pfizer’s, 12 women given the vaccine made it through trials after getting pregnant after the trials had started.
Sit down dude.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:22 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Please show the evidence that supported his recommendation.
Clown
Clown
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:47 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:Those numbers were proven to be complete bullshite years ago.
there are hundred of thousands of extra American deaths to account for in that exact time frame
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:50 pm to honeybadger07
quote:
The shot was approved for use by the FDA in December of 2020 with phase 1 trial testing on humans starting in April of 2020. So as I stated before, it was under a year (only a month available to public). For the trial phases both Moderna and Pfizer tested people for being pregnant as they DID NOT WANT TO TEST ON PREGNANT WOMEN. 12 women made it through the cracks on Pfizer being pregnant in phase trials and a small undisclosed amount for Moderna. So you tell me how in the hell is one supposed to say one way or the other if it is safe for pregnant women when the trials were intended to avoid pregnant women. So I ask again…how can he have concern it could cause problems and then less than a month later tell the public there is no concern with ZERO evidence to support that claim. In the end it may have turned out not to cause it, but it also could have and he is making recommendations with no evidence to support it. Try harder dumb frick
At the time of this text message, 10,000 pregnant women had already taken the vaccine during EUA
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:51 pm to Odysseus32
quote:This is weak. You’ve got nothing so you’re resorting insults.
I was about to type something but you’re actually too stupid to understand my point.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:55 pm to honeybadger07
quote:
Clinical trials tested women for being pregnant before accepting them into trial phasing as they did NOT want pregnant women testing out the vaccine.
Clinical trials were over
You are literally arguing a point that has now been proven over and over. But just don't like that experts in this field used actual data available to make the right decision.
You ar arguing "what if" about something we now know and they made the 100% correct assumptions.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 8/11/26 at 5:00 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
That doesn’t sound good but not as bad as the whole secretly funding gain of function research in a Chinese lab and then trying to cover his tracks when it got out and killed millions of people and disrupted the world for a few years thing.
That is a little worse IMO.
That is a little worse IMO.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 5:14 pm to SquatchDawg
That's where I am with this. There are plenty of valid criticisms without having to resort to made up numbers. They knew that masks were largely ineffective but pushed them anyway. They refused to acknowledge natural immunity from infections. That eroded the public's trust. We had tons of ridiculous public policy that they deserve blame for.
The idea that millions of women miscarried or millions of people died from the vaccine and are somehow hidden, is fiction.
The idea that millions of women miscarried or millions of people died from the vaccine and are somehow hidden, is fiction.
Popular
Back to top



3





